-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New option for Waveshare 2.13 (D) display #44
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e872eab
ADD: Display: Waveshare 2.13 (D)
lightisfaster 00bf54b
BUG: WAVESHARE.PART_UPDATE is not supported
lightisfaster dbf3290
CHG: Adjustment of the text alignment in the display
lightisfaster 42697ca
CHG: Adjustment of the text alignment in the display
lightisfaster File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These options are mutually exclusive. I'm not sure how to install the library (maybe i did that wrong) but why not using
elif
constructs? This fixed my issue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's correct. I took the normal if so as not to touch the papirus block. If the correct display is choose in the config.ini, there are no problems either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can make the change with a separate PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure i understand the approach. Why don't you want to touch the papirus block? This is a configuration procedure and there is some kind of fallback-mode via "waveshare" (as it's not 100% specified). However, that works with elif as well and these values are mutually exclusive. Using "if", not elif, makes it error-prone: I had issues with the normal if-block. Maybe i missed the point somewhere: Where is the description of the installation of the waveshare-library? Maybe i did that wrong.
But that should not prevent doing elifs?!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you look at the existing PRs, you will see the touch of the papirus block will results in additional merge conflicts. I would therefore prefer to have a new PR with the elif. Then we can choose the time when we approve the adjustment. I have no problems using the normal if.