-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Respect the property com.gs.transport_protocol.lrmi.support-codebase … #8
Conversation
…when setting the code base. If this property is false, no code base will be set. See also AnnotatedObjectOutputStream#writeAnnotation(Class)
![]() Fixing PR: track the progress here.I'm currently fixing this PR to address the following: [Sweep GHA Fix] The GitHub Actions run failed with the following error logs:
An error has occurred: Message is too long, max tokens is -9057 (tracking ID: 17648713d5) |
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@2lambda123 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR Type: Enhancement
PR Summary: The pull request introduces a conditional logic to set the codebase based on the 'com.gs.transport_protocol.lrmi.support-codebase' property. If the property is set to false, the codebase will not be assigned.
Decision: Comment
📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
- Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.
General suggestions:
- Ensure that the rest of the codebase is prepared to handle a 'null' value for the codebase, as this change introduces a new code path where the codebase might not be set.
- Refactor the 'support_code_base' variable to a shared location to avoid duplication and adhere to the DRY principle.
- Consider renaming variables and parameters to follow Java naming conventions and improve code readability.
Your trial expires on February 1, 2024. Please email tim@sourcery.ai to continue using Sourcery ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ | |||
@com.gigaspaces.api.InternalApi | |||
public class EntryClassBase implements Serializable { | |||
|
|||
private static final boolean support_code_base = Boolean.getBoolean("com.gs.transport_protocol.lrmi.support-codebase"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (llm): Consider renaming the 'support_code_base' variable to follow Java naming conventions, such as 'supportCodeBase'.
@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ public EntryClassBase(EntryClass eclass, String codebase) { | |||
* Sets the codebase to the codebase of the given class. | |||
*/ | |||
public void setCodebase(Class cls) { | |||
codebase = RMIClassLoader.getClassAnnotation(cls); | |||
codebase = support_code_base ? RMIClassLoader.getClassAnnotation(cls) : null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (llm): The conditional assignment of 'null' to 'codebase' when 'support_code_base' is false may lead to unexpected behavior if other parts of the code assume 'codebase' is always non-null. Ensure that this case is handled properly.
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ | |||
@com.gigaspaces.api.InternalApi | |||
public class ServiceTypeBase implements Serializable { | |||
|
|||
private static final boolean support_code_base = Boolean.getBoolean("com.gs.transport_protocol.lrmi.support-codebase"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (llm): The 'support_code_base' variable is duplicated in both 'EntryClassBase' and 'ServiceTypeBase'. Consider refactoring to a shared location to adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.
@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ public ServiceTypeBase(ServiceType type, String codebase) { | |||
* Sets the codebase to the codebase of the given class. | |||
*/ | |||
public void setCodebase(Class cls) { | |||
codebase = RMIClassLoader.getClassAnnotation(cls); | |||
codebase = support_code_base ? RMIClassLoader.getClassAnnotation(cls) : null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (llm): As with 'EntryClassBase', ensure that the potential 'null' value for 'codebase' is handled correctly throughout the codebase to prevent null pointer exceptions.
@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ public EntryClassBase(EntryClass eclass, String codebase) { | |||
* Sets the codebase to the codebase of the given class. | |||
*/ | |||
public void setCodebase(Class cls) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (llm): The parameter 'cls' could be more descriptively named to indicate its purpose or usage, such as 'targetClass'.
…when setting the code base. If this property is false, no code base will be set. See also AnnotatedObjectOutputStream#writeAnnotation(Class)
Description
Related Issue
Types of changes
Checklist: