Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Respect the property com.gs.transport_protocol.lrmi.support-codebase … #8

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2024

Conversation

2lambda123
Copy link
Owner

…when setting the code base. If this property is false, no code base will be set. See also AnnotatedObjectOutputStream#writeAnnotation(Class)

Description

Related Issue

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Chore (non-breaking change that does not add functionality or fix an issue)

Checklist:

  • I have read the Code of Conduct
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All commits are GPG signed

…when setting the code base. If this property is false, no code base will be set. See also AnnotatedObjectOutputStream#writeAnnotation(Class)
@labels-and-badges labels-and-badges bot added NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. labels Jan 19, 2024
@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added the 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet label Jan 19, 2024
Copy link

sweep-ai bot commented Jan 19, 2024

Sweeping

Fixing PR: track the progress here.

I'm currently fixing this PR to address the following:

[Sweep GHA Fix] The GitHub Actions run failed with the following error logs:



[!CAUTION]

An error has occurred: Message is too long, max tokens is -9057 (tracking ID: 17648713d5)

@2lambda123 2lambda123 merged commit 3065af1 into master Jan 19, 2024
3 of 5 checks passed
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@2lambda123 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1859601 and 624b3e5.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added ✨ Merged Pull Request has been merged successfully and removed ✨ Merged Pull Request has been merged successfully 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet labels Jan 19, 2024
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Enhancement

PR Summary: The pull request introduces a conditional logic to set the codebase based on the 'com.gs.transport_protocol.lrmi.support-codebase' property. If the property is set to false, the codebase will not be assigned.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.

General suggestions:

  • Ensure that the rest of the codebase is prepared to handle a 'null' value for the codebase, as this change introduces a new code path where the codebase might not be set.
  • Refactor the 'support_code_base' variable to a shared location to avoid duplication and adhere to the DRY principle.
  • Consider renaming variables and parameters to follow Java naming conventions and improve code readability.

Your trial expires on February 1, 2024. Please email tim@sourcery.ai to continue using Sourcery ✨


Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
@com.gigaspaces.api.InternalApi
public class EntryClassBase implements Serializable {

private static final boolean support_code_base = Boolean.getBoolean("com.gs.transport_protocol.lrmi.support-codebase");
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): Consider renaming the 'support_code_base' variable to follow Java naming conventions, such as 'supportCodeBase'.

@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ public EntryClassBase(EntryClass eclass, String codebase) {
* Sets the codebase to the codebase of the given class.
*/
public void setCodebase(Class cls) {
codebase = RMIClassLoader.getClassAnnotation(cls);
codebase = support_code_base ? RMIClassLoader.getClassAnnotation(cls) : null;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (llm): The conditional assignment of 'null' to 'codebase' when 'support_code_base' is false may lead to unexpected behavior if other parts of the code assume 'codebase' is always non-null. Ensure that this case is handled properly.

@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
@com.gigaspaces.api.InternalApi
public class ServiceTypeBase implements Serializable {

private static final boolean support_code_base = Boolean.getBoolean("com.gs.transport_protocol.lrmi.support-codebase");
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): The 'support_code_base' variable is duplicated in both 'EntryClassBase' and 'ServiceTypeBase'. Consider refactoring to a shared location to adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.

@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ public ServiceTypeBase(ServiceType type, String codebase) {
* Sets the codebase to the codebase of the given class.
*/
public void setCodebase(Class cls) {
codebase = RMIClassLoader.getClassAnnotation(cls);
codebase = support_code_base ? RMIClassLoader.getClassAnnotation(cls) : null;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (llm): As with 'EntryClassBase', ensure that the potential 'null' value for 'codebase' is handled correctly throughout the codebase to prevent null pointer exceptions.

@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ public EntryClassBase(EntryClass eclass, String codebase) {
* Sets the codebase to the codebase of the given class.
*/
public void setCodebase(Class cls) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): The parameter 'cls' could be more descriptively named to indicate its purpose or usage, such as 'targetClass'.

@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added the 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet label Jan 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants