-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: create only archive with version in name on azures pipeline #1151
Conversation
🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request! Tips
|
WalkthroughThe recent update in the build process involves adding a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as User
participant Pipeline as Azure Pipeline
participant Script as create_and_pack_executable.py
participant Archive as archive_build
User->>Pipeline: Triggers Build
Pipeline->>Script: Execute with --no-simple-zip
Script->>Archive: Call archive_build(simple_zip=False)
Archive->>Script: Build Archived without simplified zip
Script->>Pipeline: Return build status
Pipeline->>User: Notify build outcome
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We've reviewed this pull request using the Sourcery rules engine. If you would also like our AI-powered code review then let us know.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (1 hunks)
- build_utils/create_and_pack_executable.py (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (1)
19-19
: Verify integration of--no-simple-zip
flag with Python script modifications.The addition of the
--no-simple-zip
flag in the Azure Pipelines configuration should be consistent with the changes in thecreate_and_pack_executable.py
script. Ensure that this flag is properly handled in the script to avoid any discrepancies in the build process.build_utils/create_and_pack_executable.py (3)
Line range hint
1-99
: Confirm file integrity and consistency.Ensure that all changes in
create_and_pack_executable.py
are consistent with the described functionality and that there are no unintended side effects or errors introduced by the modifications.Verification successful
File integrity and consistency confirmed.
The file
create_and_pack_executable.py
maintains its integrity and the changes are consistent with the described functionality. No unintended side effects or errors were introduced.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm the integrity and consistency of the entire file. # Test: Check for unintended changes or errors in the file. Expect: No unintended changes or errors. rg --type python -A 5 $'create_and_pack_executable.py'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the file and display its contents for verification. fd create_and_pack_executable.py --exec catLength of output: 3348
Line range hint
89-99
: Approve the handling of--no-simple-zip
flag inmain
.The addition of the
--no-simple-zip
flag provides a command-line interface to control the archive creation process dynamically. Verify that this flag is correctly parsed and affects thearchive_build
function as intended.Verification successful
The
--no-simple-zip
flag is correctly handled in themain
function.
- The flag is correctly parsed with
action="store_false"
, settingargs.no_simple_zip
toFalse
when used.- The
archive_build
function receives this parameter and adjusts its behavior accordingly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct parsing and effect of the `--no-simple-zip` flag. # Test: Check the command-line parsing and its impact on the `archive_build` function. Expect: Correct parsing and intended effect. rg --type python -A 5 $'args.no_simple_zip'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct parsing and effect of the `--no-simple-zip` flag. # Test: Check the command-line parsing and its impact on the `archive_build` function. Expect: Correct parsing and intended effect. rg --type py -A 5 'args.no_simple_zip'Length of output: 358
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct parsing and effect of the `--no-simple-zip` flag. # Test: Check the command-line parsing for `--no-simple-zip`. Expect: Correct parsing. rg --type py 'add_argument' -A 3 # Test: Check the implementation of `archive_build` function. Expect: Correct handling of `no_simple_zip` parameter. rg --type py 'def archive_build' -A 10Length of output: 5822
Line range hint
67-79
: Approve the addition ofsimple_zip
parameter inarchive_build
.The addition of the
simple_zip
parameter allows for conditional control over the archive creation process, which is a flexible design choice. Ensure that the default behavior (simple_zip=True
) aligns with the existing build configurations and expectations.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
--no-simple-zip
to provide flexibility in how builds are archived during packaging.Chores
--no-simple-zip
option for build packaging.