fix: Fix bug in code for checking for survey file

[Czaki]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced file path handling by ensuring paths are resolved to absolute locations.
  • Added a check to create necessary directories for file paths, preventing potential errors.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved robustness in file handling to avoid issues related to missing directories.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the file handling process in the check_survey.py module. Specifically, the path for the IGNORE_FILE_PATH variable is now resolved to an absolute path, improving reliability. Additionally, a check ensures that the parent directory exists before the file is accessed, creating any necessary directories if they are absent. These updates contribute to greater robustness in managing file paths and avoiding potential errors.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
package/PartSeg/_launcher/check_survey.py	Modified IGNORE_FILE_PATH to resolve it as an absolute path; added a check to create the parent directory if it doesn't exist before accessing the file.

Poem

🐰 In the land of paths and files,
A rabbit hops with joyful smiles.
"Resolve, create, let none despair,
For every path, we show we care!"
With every hop, a new way found,
File handling's safe, and joy abounds! 🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sourcery-ai]

🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

We've reviewed this pull request using the Sourcery rules engine. If you would also like our AI-powered code review then let us know.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2292bac and 7007078.

Files selected for processing (1)

• package/PartSeg/_launcher/check_survey.py (2 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (2)

package/PartSeg/_launcher/check_survey.py (2)

18-18: LGTM! Resolving the path to an absolute path is a good practice.

This change enhances the reliability of file path handling by ensuring the path is absolute.

---

48-49: LGTM! Ensuring the directory exists adds robustness.

The addition of a check for the parent directory's existence and creating it if necessary prevents potential errors related to missing directories.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93.10%. Comparing base (2292bac) to head (7007078).
Report is 43 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
package/PartSeg/_launcher/check_survey.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1174      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    93.09%   93.10%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          209      209              
  Lines        32883    32885       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits         30611    30617       +6     
+ Misses        2272     2268       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.