Upload the test result to Codecov #103
Conversation
It can comment the reason why tests failed.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #103 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 93 93
Branches 6 6
=========================================
Hits 93 93 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the CI workflow configuration, specifically updating the test job command from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
deno.json (1)
14-14: LGTM! Consider splitting the command for better readability.The new
test:citask correctly implements the required functionality for Codecov integration by generating both JUnit test results and coverage data. However, the command could be more readable if split into separate tasks.Consider this alternative structure for better maintainability:
- "test:ci": "deno task test --coverage --junit-path='junit.xml' && deno coverage --lcov > coverage.lcov" + "test:coverage": "deno task test --coverage --junit-path='junit.xml'", + "test:lcov": "deno coverage --lcov > coverage.lcov", + "test:ci": "deno task test:coverage && deno task test:lcov"This separation:
- Makes each step's purpose clearer
- Allows running coverage or LCOV generation independently if needed
- Improves maintainability as each task has a single responsibility
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)deno.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)
75-75: LGTM: Test command updated to generate JUnit reports
The change from deno task cov to deno task test:ci aligns with the PR objective by generating JUnit reports that can provide detailed test failure information to Codecov.
82-87: Verify test results upload configuration
The test results upload step is well-positioned after the coverage upload and uses the official Codecov action. However, let's verify a few things:
- The action version
9739113ad922ea0a9abb4b2c0f8bf6a4aa8ef820is pinned to v1.0.1, which is good for security. - The failure protection with
if: ${{ !cancelled() }}ensures we don't attempt uploads for cancelled runs. - The same
CODECOV_TOKENis used for both coverage and test results uploads.
✅ Verification successful
Test results upload configuration is properly set up
The verification confirms that:
- The test:ci task is correctly configured to generate JUnit XML reports with
--junit-path='junit.xml' - The junit.xml file is properly listed in .gitignore (line 4)
- The workflow configuration uses pinned version and proper failure protection
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the JUnit report generation in the test:ci task
# Test: Check if the test:ci task is properly configured in deno.json
echo "Checking deno.json for test:ci task configuration..."
cat deno.json
# Test: Check if junit.xml is properly ignored
echo -e "\nChecking .gitignore for junit.xml entry..."
cat .gitignore | grep -n "junit.xml" || echo "Warning: junit.xml not found in .gitignore"
Length of output: 1168
close #
✏️ Description
It can comment the reason why tests failed.
🔄 Type of the Change
Code of Conduct.