-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Follow up the previous Renovate update #110
Conversation
Depricated configs should not be used.
Renovate took over the job.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to two configuration files: Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1).pre-commit-config.yaml (1)
The addition of strict validation is good for catching potential issues early. However, we should verify that removing the Let's check the hook's documentation and default behavior: Consider documenting the rationale for enabling strict validation in the commit message or PR description to help future maintainers understand the decision. ✅ Verification successfulRemoving The hook has a default file pattern 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the renovate-config-validator hook configuration
# Expected results: Find documentation about default file patterns and strict mode
# Check the hook's documentation
gh repo view renovatebot/pre-commit-hooks --json description,homepageUrl,url --jq '.description,.homepageUrl,.url'
# Search for example configurations
rg -A 5 'renovate-config-validator' $(fd -t f '\.pre-commit-config\.ya?ml')
Length of output: 269 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the hook's configuration
# Check the current renovate configuration files
fd -t f 'renovate\.json|\.renovaterc|\.renovaterc\.json'
# Check if there are any other YAML files that might contain renovate config
fd -t f '\.ya?ml$' --exec grep -l 'renovate' {}
# Look for any documentation about renovate configuration
fd -t f 'README\.md' --exec grep -l -i 'renovate' {}
# Check the full pre-commit config to understand the context
cat .pre-commit-config.yaml
Length of output: 1503 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check for renovate configuration files in the repository
# and verify if the validator would still catch them without explicit file patterns
# Look for renovate.json5 files as well
fd -t f 'renovate\.json5'
# Check for package.json files that might contain renovate config
fd -t f 'package\.json' --exec grep -l '"renovate":' {}
# Check the repository root for any renovate configuration
ls -la renovate.json renovate.json5 .renovaterc .renovaterc.json 2>/dev/null
# Let's also check the pre-commit hooks repository for default patterns
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/renovatebot/pre-commit-hooks/39.23.0/.pre-commit-hooks.yaml
Length of output: 510 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
close #
✏️ Description
🔄 Type of the Change
Code of Conduct.