Thinc is the machine learning library powering spaCy. It features a battle-tested linear model designed for large sparse learning problems, and a flexible neural network model under development for spaCy v2.0.
Thinc is a practical toolkit for implementing models that follow the "Embed, encode, attend, predict" architecture. It's designed to be easy to install, efficient for CPU usage and optimised for NLP and deep learning with text – in particular, hierarchically structured input and variable-length sequences.
🔮 Read the release notes here.
| Module | Description |
|---|---|
thinc.v2v.Model |
Base class. |
thinc.v2v |
Layers transforming vectors to vectors. |
thinc.i2v |
Layers embedding IDs to vectors. |
thinc.t2v |
Layers pooling tensors to vectors. |
thinc.t2t |
Layers transforming tensors to tensors (e.g. CNN, LSTM). |
thinc.api |
Higher-order functions, for building networks. Will be renamed. |
thinc.extra |
Datasets and utilities. |
thinc.neural.ops |
Container classes for mathematical operations. Will be reorganized. |
thinc.linear.avgtron |
Legacy efficient Averaged Perceptron implementation. |
Thinc's deep learning functionality is still under active development: APIs are unstable, and we're not yet ready to provide usage support. However, if you're already quite familiar with neural networks, there's a lot here you might find interesting. Thinc's conceptual model is quite different from TensorFlow's. Thinc also implements some novel features, such as a small DSL for concisely wiring up models, embedding tables that support pre-computation and the hashing trick, dynamic batch sizes, a concatenation-based approach to variable-length sequences, and support for model averaging for the Adam solver (which performs very well).
The central problem for a neural network implementation is this: during the forward pass, you compute results that will later be useful during the backward pass. How do you keep track of this arbitrary state, while making sure that layers can be cleanly composed?
Most libraries solve this problem by having you declare the forward computations, which are then compiled into a graph somewhere behind the scenes. Thinc doesn't have a "computational graph". Instead, we just use the stack, because we put the state from the forward pass into callbacks.
All nodes in the network have a simple signature:
f(inputs) -> {outputs, f(d_outputs)->d_inputs}
To make this less abstract, here's a ReLu activation, following this signature:
def relu(inputs):
mask = inputs > 0
def backprop_relu(d_outputs, optimizer):
return d_outputs * mask
return inputs * mask, backprop_reluWhen you call the relu function, you get back an output variable, and a
callback. This lets you calculate a gradient using the output, and then pass it
into the callback to perform the backward pass.
This signature makes it easy to build a complex network out of smaller pieces, using arbitrary higher-order functions you can write yourself. To make this clearer, we need a function for a weights layer. Usually this will be implemented as a class — but let's continue using closures, to keep things concise, and to keep the simplicity of the interface explicit.
The main complication for the weights layer is that we now have a side-effect to manage: we would like to update the weights. There are a few ways to handle this. In Thinc we currently pass a callable into the backward pass. (I'm not convinced this is best.)
import numpy
def create_linear_layer(n_out, n_in):
W = numpy.zeros((n_out, n_in))
b = numpy.zeros((n_out, 1))
def forward(X):
Y = W @ X + b
def backward(dY, optimizer):
dX = W.T @ dY
dW = numpy.einsum('ik,jk->ij', dY, X)
db = dY.sum(axis=0)
optimizer(W, dW)
optimizer(b, db)
return dX
return Y, backward
return forwardIf we call Wb = create_linear_layer(5, 4), the variable Wb will be the
forward() function, implemented inside the body of create_linear_layer().
The Wb instance will have access to the W and b variable defined in its
outer scope. If we invoke create_linear_layer() again, we get a new instance,
with its own internal state.
The Wb instance and the relu function have exactly the same signature. This
makes it easy to write higher order functions to compose them. The most obvious
thing to do is chain them together:
def chain(*layers):
def forward(X):
backprops = []
Y = X
for layer in layers:
Y, backprop = layer(Y)
backprops.append(backprop)
def backward(dY, optimizer):
for backprop in reversed(backprops):
dY = backprop(dY, optimizer)
return dY
return Y, backward
return forwardWe could now chain our linear layer together with the relu activation, to
create a simple feed-forward network:
Wb1 = create_linear_layer(10, 5)
Wb2 = create_linear_layer(3, 10)
model = chain(Wb1, relu, Wb2)
X = numpy.random.uniform(size=(5, 4))
y, bp_y = model(X)
dY = y - truth
dX = bp_y(dY, optimizer)This conceptual model makes Thinc very flexible. The trade-off is that Thinc is less convenient and efficient at workloads that fit exactly into what TensorFlow etc. are designed for. If your graph really is static, and your inputs are homogenous in size and shape, Keras will likely be faster and simpler. But if you want to pass normal Python objects through your network, or handle sequences and recursions of arbitrary length or complexity, you might find Thinc's design a better fit for your problem.
Thinc should install cleanly with both pip
and conda, for Pythons 2.7+ and
3.5+, on Linux, macOS / OSX and Windows. Its only system
dependency is a compiler tool-chain (e.g. build-essential) and the Python
development headers (e.g. python-dev).
pip install thincFor GPU support, we're grateful to use the work of Chainer's cupy module,
which provides a numpy-compatible interface for GPU arrays. However, installing
Chainer when no GPU is available currently causes an error. We therefore do not
list Chainer as an explicit dependency — so building Thinc for GPU requires some
extra steps:
export CUDA_HOME=/usr/local/cuda-8.0 # Or wherever your CUDA is
export PATH=$PATH:$CUDA_HOME/bin
pip install chainer
python -c "import cupy; assert cupy" # Check it installed
pip install thinc # Or `thinc[cuda]`The rest of this section describes how to build Thinc from source. If you have Fabric installed, you can use the shortcut:
git clone https://github.com/explosion/thinc
cd thinc
fab clean env make testYou can then run the examples as follows:
fab eg.mnist
fab eg.basic_tagger
fab eg.cnn_taggerOtherwise, you can build and test explicitly with:
git clone https://github.com/explosion/thinc
cd thinc
virtualenv .env
source .env/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
python setup.py build_ext --inplace
py.test thinc/And then run the examples as follows:
python examples/mnist.py
python examples/basic_tagger.py
python examples/cnn_tagger.pyThe Neural Network API is still subject to change, even within minor versions. You can get a feel for the current API by checking out the examples. Here are a few quick highlights.
Models can be created with some dimensions unspecified. Missing dimensions are inferred when pre-trained weights are loaded or when training begins. This eliminates a common source of programmer error:
# Invalid network — shape mismatch
model = chain(ReLu(512, 748), ReLu(512, 784), Softmax(10))
# Leave the dimensions unspecified, and you can't be wrong.
model = chain(ReLu(512), ReLu(512), Softmax())The Model.define_operators() classmethod allows you to bind arbitrary binary
functions to Python operators, for use in any Model instance. The method can
(and should) be used as a context-manager, so that the overloading is limited to
the immediate block. This allows concise and expressive model definition:
with Model.define_operators({'>>': chain}):
model = ReLu(512) >> ReLu(512) >> Softmax()The overloading is cleaned up at the end of the block. A fairly arbitrary zoo of functions are currently implemented. Some of the most useful:
chain(model1, model2): Compose two modelsf(x)andg(x)into a single model computingg(f(x)).clone(model1, int): Createncopies of a model, each with distinct weights, and chain them together.concatenate(model1, model2): Given two models with output dimensions(n,)and(m,), construct a model with output dimensions(m+n,).add(model1, model2):add(f(x), g(x)) = f(x)+g(x)make_tuple(model1, model2): Construct tuples of the outputs of two models, at the batch level. The backward pass expects to receive a tuple of gradients, which are routed through the appropriate model, and summed.
Putting these things together, here's the sort of tagging model that Thinc is designed to make easy.
with Model.define_operators({'>>': chain, '**': clone, '|': concatenate}):
model = (
add_eol_markers('EOL')
>> flatten
>> memoize(
CharLSTM(char_width)
| (normalize >> str2int >> Embed(word_width)))
>> ExtractWindow(nW=2)
>> BatchNorm(ReLu(hidden_width)) ** 3
>> Softmax()
)Not all of these pieces are implemented yet, but hopefully this shows where
we're going. The memoize function will be particularly important: in any batch
of text, the common words will be very common. It's therefore important to
evaluate models such as the CharLSTM once per word type per minibatch, rather
than once per token.
Most neural network libraries use a computational graph abstraction. This takes
the execution away from you, so that gradients can be computed automatically.
Thinc follows a style more like the autograd library, but with larger
operations. Usage is as follows:
def explicit_sgd_update(X, y):
sgd = lambda weights, gradient: weights - gradient * 0.001
yh, finish_update = model.begin_update(X, drop=0.2)
finish_update(y-yh, sgd)Separating the backpropagation into three parts like this has many advantages.
The interface to all models is completely uniform — there is no distinction
between the top-level model you use as a predictor and the internal models for
the layers. We also make concurrency simple, by making the begin_update() step
a pure function, and separating the accumulation of the gradient from the action
of the optimizer.
To keep the class hierarchy shallow, Thinc uses class decorators to reuse code for layer definitions. Specifically, the following decorators are available:
describe.attributes(): Allows attributes to be specified by keyword argument. Used especially for dimensions and parameters.describe.on_init(): Allows callbacks to be specified, which will be called at the end of the__init__.py.describe.on_data(): Allows callbacks to be specified, which will be called onModel.begin_training().
| Version | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| v7.3.1 | 2019-10-30 |
Relax dependecy requirements |
| v7.3.0 | 2019-10-28 |
Mish activation and experimental optimizers |
| v7.2.0 | 2019-10-20 |
Simpler GPU install and bug fixes |
| v7.1.1 | 2019-09-10 |
Support preshed v3.0.0 |
| v7.1.0 | 2019-08-23 |
Support other CPUs, read-only arrays |
| v7.0.8 | 2019-07-11 |
Fix version for PyPi |
| v7.0.7 | 2019-07-11 |
Avoid allocating a negative shape for ngrams |
| v7.0.6 | 2019-07-11 |
Fix LinearModel regression |
| v7.0.5 | 2019-07-10 |
Bug fixes for pickle, threading, unflatten and consistency |
| v7.0.4 | 2019-03-19 |
Don't require thinc_gpu_ops |
| v7.0.3 | 2019-03-15 |
Fix pruning in beam search |
| v7.0.2 | 2019-02-23 |
Fix regression in linear model class |
| v7.0.1 | 2019-02-16 |
Fix import errors |
| v7.0.0 | 2019-02-15 |
Overhaul package dependencies |
| v6.12.1 | 2018-11-30 |
Fix msgpack pin |
| v6.12.0 | 2018-10-15 |
Wheels and separate GPU ops |
| v6.10.3 | 2018-07-21 |
Python 3.7 support and dependency updates |
| v6.11.2 | 2018-05-21 |
Improve GPU installation |
| v6.11.1 | 2018-05-20 |
Support direct linkage to BLAS libraries |
| v6.11.0 | 2018-03-16 |
n/a |
| v6.10.2 | 2017-12-06 |
Efficiency improvements and bug fixes |
| v6.10.1 | 2017-11-15 |
Fix GPU install and minor memory leak |
| v6.10.0 | 2017-10-28 |
CPU efficiency improvements, refactoring |
| v6.9.0 | 2017-10-03 |
Reorganize layers, bug fix to Layer Normalization |
| v6.8.2 | 2017-09-26 |
Fix packaging of gpu_ops |
| v6.8.1 | 2017-08-23 |
Fix Windows support |
| v6.8.0 | 2017-07-25 |
SELU layer, attention, improved GPU/CPU compatibility |
| v6.7.3 | 2017-06-05 |
Fix convolution on GPU |
| v6.7.2 | 2017-06-02 |
Bug fixes to serialization |
| v6.7.1 | 2017-06-02 |
Improve serialization |
| v6.7.0 | 2017-06-01 |
Fixes to serialization, hash embeddings and flatten ops |
| v6.6.0 | 2017-05-14 |
Improved GPU usage and examples |
| v6.5.2 | 2017-03-20 |
n/a |
| v6.5.1 | 2017-03-20 |
Improved linear class and Windows fix |
| v6.5.0 | 2017-03-11 |
Supervised similarity, fancier embedding and improvements to linear model |
| v6.4.0 | 2017-02-15 |
n/a |
| v6.3.0 | 2017-01-25 |
Efficiency improvements, argument checking and error messaging |
| v6.2.0 | 2017-01-15 |
Improve API and introduce overloaded operators |
| v6.1.3 | 2017-01-10 |
More neural network functions and training continuation |
| v6.1.2 | 2017-01-09 |
n/a |
| v6.1.1 | 2017-01-09 |
n/a |
| v6.1.0 | 2017-01-09 |
n/a |
| v6.0.0 | 2016-12-31 |
Add thinc.neural for NLP-oriented deep learning |