Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix transmission implementation and improve specification #151

Conversation

portsmouth
Copy link
Contributor

Also improve wording/formatting in the spec Translucent base section.

This addresses the points raised in #148.

Also improve wording/formatting in the spec Translucent base section.
Copy link
Member

@jstone-lucasfilm jstone-lucasfilm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like a good change, @portsmouth, though we should address the warning noted below.

reference/open_pbr_surface.mtlx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jstone-lucasfilm jstone-lucasfilm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me, @portsmouth, and most of the OpenPBR example materials work correctly with this change, though we have one example material that needs an update to render correctly:
https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenPBR/blob/main/examples/open_pbr_surface_default.mtlx

I'll go ahead and approve this change, but we should make sure to fix and verify the example materials before marking an 0.3 release.

@jstone-lucasfilm jstone-lucasfilm changed the title Fix up errors in the MaterialX XML transmission section. Fix transmission implementation and improve specification Feb 9, 2024
@jstone-lucasfilm jstone-lucasfilm merged commit 656945e into AcademySoftwareFoundation:main Feb 9, 2024
1 check passed
jstone-lucasfilm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants