Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove problematic CSS !importants #410

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2016

Conversation

LydiaBarnes
Copy link
Contributor

While refactoring the CSS for tables in the product, I realized there are some !importants in Ember Table itself that could be removed. I only addressed the couple that were directly affecting our overwriting CSS, I didn't do a major overhaul. The ones I removed weren't even really needed in the first place, the selectors were specific enough already so I have no idea why !important was used.

@Addepar/design @cyril-sf @shiller-addepar @embooglement

@LydiaBarnes
Copy link
Contributor Author

BTW I also tested on the demo-app branch.

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
}

.ember-table-left-table-block .ember-table-cell {
border-right: 16px solid transparent !important;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

finally! ❤️

@LydiaBarnes
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest

@LydiaBarnes LydiaBarnes merged commit 0d80e69 into master Oct 3, 2016
LydiaBarnes added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2016
…ortants

Remove problematic CSS !importants
LydiaBarnes added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2016
…ortants

Remove problematic CSS !importants
LydiaBarnes added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2016
Merge pull request #410 from Addepar/lydia/remove-problematic-css-importants
@bantic bantic deleted the lydia/remove-problematic-css-importants branch July 11, 2019 19:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants