Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

www.instagram.com #138429

Closed
adguard-bot opened this issue Dec 26, 2022 · 12 comments
Closed

www.instagram.com #138429

adguard-bot opened this issue Dec 26, 2022 · 12 comments

Comments

@adguard-bot
Copy link

Issue URL (Incorrect Blocking)

https://www.instagram.com/p/CmdnKcUpGVf/

Comment

I test disable the filter described in log, but unable to show the content, seems it is removed by Cosmetic rule

Screenshots

Screenshot 1

Screenshot 1

Screenshot 2

Screenshot 2

System configuration

Information value
AdGuard product: AdGuard for Windows v7.11.3
Browser: Firefox
AdGuard driver: TDI
Stealth mode: disabled
DNS filtering: server: https://security.cloudflare-dns.com/dns-query
filters: https://filters.adtidy.org/windows/filters/15.txt, User+rules, https://adguardteam.github.io/HostlistsRegistry/assets/filter_29.txt
Filters: Ad Blocking:
AdGuard Base

Privacy:
AdGuard Tracking Protection

Social Widgets:
AdGuard Social Media

Annoyances:
Adblock Warning Removal List,
AdGuard Annoyances

Security:
Online Malicious URL Blocklist,
NoCoin Filter List

Language-specific:
CJX's Annoyances List,
AdGuard Chinese,
AdGuard German,
AdGuard Japanese
Userscripts: https://userscripts.adtidy.org/release/adguard-extra/1.0/adguard-extra.user.js,
https://userscripts.adtidy.org/release/popup-blocker/2.5/popupblocker.user.js
Referrer: https://www.instagram.com/taotsuchiya_official/
@Alex-302
Copy link
Member

Cannot reproduce. Which filter causes it?

@Alex-302 Alex-302 added the A: Waiting for data Waiting for more information from the user label Dec 26, 2022
@Alex-302 Alex-302 changed the title www.instagram.com www.instagram.com Dec 26, 2022
@kodiakhub
Copy link

Hi @Alex-302 i can reproduce this issue, it's similar to this issue: #137874

this rule is causing this issue.:

image

@Alex-302
Copy link
Member

@AdamWr Can you check again? Still not reproduced in my browser.

@Alex-302 Alex-302 added the A: Cannot reproduce Filters devs cannot reproduce this issue label Dec 27, 2022
@kodiakhub
Copy link

Hi @Alex-302 the issue of link is incorrect (probably OP was trying to show the issue where is exactly happened, thats why) The correct link is this one: https://www.instagram.com/taotsuchiya_official/ when you here find the content as i show in the picture:

image
and click that, this content will not load.

@krystian3w
Copy link
Contributor

krystian3w commented Dec 28, 2022

You mean inccorect blocked login wall?

For now Instagram need account (no longer works simple instagram.com#%#//scriptlet('set-constant', '_sharedData.is_whitelisted_crawl_bot', 'true')) and down in Google search for many profiles (lack of indexing may explain that crawl bots no longer have a preview of posts).

@Alex-302
Copy link
Member

Stil cannot reprodcue.
Which filter breaks?

@kodiakhub
Copy link

Stil cannot reprodcue. Which filter breaks?

Did check again, looks like somehow it's fixed. How? Filter update? There must be an explanation for this.

See this:

image

This filter rule no longer appears in filtering logs (like on this screenshot #138429 (comment)):

instagram.com#?#article[role="presentation"] > div[style]:-abp-has(span:-abp-contains(/Gesponsert|Sponsored|Geborg|Sponzorováno|Sponsoreret|Χορηγούμενη|Publicidad|Sponsoroitu|Sponsorisé|Bersponsor|Sponsorizzato|広告|광고|Ditaja|Sponset|Gesponsord|Sponsorowane|Patrocinado|Реклама|Sponsrad|ได้รับการสนับสนุน|May Sponsor|Sponsorlu|赞助内容|贊助|প্রযোজিত|પ્રાયોજિત|स्पॉन्सर्ड|Sponzorirano|ಪ್ರಾಯೋಜಿತ|സ്‌പോൺസർ ചെയ്‌തത്|पुरस्‍कृत|प्रायोजित|ਪ੍ਰਾਯੋਜਿਤ|මුදල් ගෙවා ප්‍රචාරය කරන ලදි|Sponzorované|விளம்பரதாரர்கள்|స్పాన్సర్ చేసింది|Được tài trợ|Спонсорирано|Commandité|Sponsorizat|Спонзорисано/))

@Alex-302 you can close this issue as you like. 👍

@Whiskey-Hotel-0822
Copy link

Whiskey-Hotel-0822 commented Dec 31, 2022

Hi All,

I am the OP of this issue, just registered to provide more info;
@kodiakhub Thanks for your help to diagnostic the issue is from this rule, it is actual a danger rule, the content is blocked because someone left a comment with the key word "広告".
also found the keywords in the rule is google translated word not match "sponsored" in Traditional Chinese.

@Alex-302 Thanks for your help, I have temporary disable this rule to show the content, could this rule make more specific to exclude user comment?

@Whiskey-Hotel-0822
Copy link

Actually, it can be found by clicking "show more comment" button few time,
keyword

@kodiakhub
Copy link

kodiakhub commented Dec 31, 2022

Hi All,

I am the OP of this issue, just registered to provide more info; @kodiakhub Thanks for your help to diagnostic the issue is from this rule, it is actual a danger rule, the content is blocked because someone left a comment with the key word "広告". also found the keywords in the rule is google translated word not match "sponsored" in Traditional Chinese.

You're welcome and now I understand what caused what, thanks for a nice explanation. 👍

Also, i can confirm this rule is break the content. @Alex-302 please see this:

Video:
20221231_114653.mp4

@krystian3w
Copy link
Contributor

But login is now required?

@AdamWr AdamWr closed this as completed in 53e520e Jan 2, 2023
@AdamWr
Copy link
Member

AdamWr commented Jan 2, 2023

I was able to reproduce issue with incorrect blocking.
Fixed, filters update should be available in 1-2 hours.

@AdamWr AdamWr added A: Resolved and removed A: Cannot reproduce Filters devs cannot reproduce this issue A: In progress Work on the issue is in progress A: Waiting for data Waiting for more information from the user labels Jan 2, 2023
Yuki2718 added a commit to uBlockOrigin/uAssets that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants