Added devolution bindings to more legislation

Aethodia · Dec 4, 2020 · b69be92 · b69be92
1 parent 13e92bb
commit b69be92
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 4 changed files with 13 additions and 4 deletions.
diff --git a/Code/NationalSymbols.rst b/Code/NationalSymbols.rst
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Contents
 Footnotes
 ============================================================
 
-.. [1] Devolutional bindings are defined in ``DevolutionScheme``.
+.. [1] Devolutional bindings are defined in ``DevolutionScheme:LegalBindings``.
 
 .. [2] It is, summarily, a variety of **Radical Centrism** tempered **by Realpolitik**.
 

diff --git a/Code/PoliticalScience/DevolutionSchema.rst b/Code/PoliticalScience/DevolutionSchema.rst
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Giving significant autonomy to devolved legislatures allows these adjustments to
 
 Contents
 ============================================================
+``Binding:N`` [1]_
 
 Devolutions
 ------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -37,3 +38,8 @@ LegalBindings
 - The default binding (where one is not explicitly stated) is ``Binding:O``.
 
 - A law can set bindings on itself and its provisions by adding a binding tag (see above) where desired.
+
+Footnotes
+============================================================
+
+.. [1] Devolutional bindings are defined in ``DevolutionScheme:LegalBindings``.
diff --git a/Code/PoliticalScience/PolicyRequisites.rst b/Code/PoliticalScience/PolicyRequisites.rst
@@ -8,10 +8,11 @@ This file defines the theoretical **requisites of all** government **policy**.
 
 Contents
 ============================================================
+``Binding:A`` [1]_
 
 - Preface
 
-  - **All policy is subject to** the same primary and secondary **ablatives**, **locatives**, and **datives** [1]_.
+  - **All policy is subject to** the same primary and secondary **ablatives**, **locatives**, and **datives** [2]_.
 
   - **Ablatives are justifications**.
 
@@ -64,4 +65,6 @@ Contents
 Footnotes
 ============================================================
 
-.. [1] While this may seem like strange terminology, it directly corresponds to one of Theodian's case axies.  Fundamentally, "ablative, locative, dative" corresponds to "from, at, to".  In this law, ablatives represent source information, locatives reprensent the state of the policy itself, and datives represent the goal(s) of the policy;  as such, the chosen vocabulary is hardly inaccurate.
+.. [1] Devolutional bindings are defined in ``DevolutionScheme:LegalBindings``.
+
+.. [2] While this may seem like strange terminology, it directly corresponds to one of Theodian's case axies.  Fundamentally, "ablative, locative, dative" corresponds to "from, at, to".  In this law, ablatives represent source information, locatives reprensent the state of the policy itself, and datives represent the goal(s) of the policy;  as such, the chosen vocabulary is hardly inaccurate.
diff --git a/Code/Theology/UnitarianUniversalism.rst b/Code/Theology/UnitarianUniversalism.rst
@@ -23,4 +23,4 @@ Contents
 Footnotes
 ============================================================
 
-.. [1] Devolutional bindings are defined in ``DevolutionScheme``.
+.. [1] Devolutional bindings are defined in ``DevolutionScheme:LegalBindings``.