Proposer can use CosGov to propose new committee via core eval (install bundle, upload files) #10138
Assignees
Labels
Governance
Governance
Comments
|
Per meeting 9/24 this ticket is to create the input files to be used in the cosgov/agoric proposal builder |
|
test plan should include
|
|
@otoole-brendan I suggest moving "can use CosGov to " out of the title to the design. It's sort of misleading - it looks like we're making a change to CosGov. |
|
as noted in #10164 (comment) , there's a little work to do here |
mergify bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2024
closes: #10134 refs: #10134 ## Description This PR implements the following: - Core eval script to replace the committee. - Builder script for setting up the core eval. - Bootstrap test to verify the functionality of the implementation. ### Security Considerations The Economic Committee plays a crucial role in managing the Inter-Protocol. The current committee doesn't easily support a smooth transition when members must retire or be replaced. An incomplete transition to a new committee could severely hamper the chain operations. Accidentally providing access to the wrong parties (or failing to remove parties whose terms have expired) could make it hard to ensure that the right committee members have control. Other chains have been sunk or badly damaged when the stakeholders couldn't restrict some people from making changes. ### Testing Considerations Bootstrap tests have been added in this PR to run in CI for testing. ### Documentation Considerations Specific documentation concerns belong in #10138. It’s important to ensure the proposal is clearly documented to avoid confusion, especially with the old committee still being around. ### Upgrade Considerations: There is minimal risk of regression because the core-eval materials are introduced in new files. The changes introduced particularly the new builder script, can be seamlessly included in any upcoming release. ### Scaling Considerations The core eval script’s performance depends on the number of Economic Committee (EC) members. Since the committee is limited to a maximum of 12 members, the script’s complexity is treated as constant because it won’t have to handle more than 12 people. Also, the script is executed approximately once a year, and all stakers receive a 3-day notice before it runs, making the scaling impact negligible.
|
@otoole-brendan @frazarshad I think this is now obsolete in favor of... |
|
obsolete in favor of #10258 |
mergify bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2024
closes: #10138 closes: #10185 closes: #10258 ## Description A3P tests for the replace electorate core eval. also adds the replace-electorate-core.js script to upgrade.go since it will now be a part of the chain halting upgrade new tests are as follows: - adds new `n:replace-electorate` which tests for acceptance of new invitations - adds params governance proposal and voting tests to `z:acceptance` ### Security Considerations ### Scaling Considerations ### Documentation Considerations ### Testing Considerations ### Upgrade Considerations
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What is the Problem Being Solved?
To rotate the EC membership, someone needs to be able to submit a proposal to do so.
Description of the Design
A builder script to go with
gov-replace-committee.js(as revised along the lines of #10105) such thatagoric run new-builder-script.jsproduces the relevant artifacts.Security Considerations
Scaling Considerations
Test Plan
Should be covered by
a3p-integrationtests in #10136, #10137 . But those are P2, so if we choose not to do them, let's be sure to test that here.Upgrade Considerations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: