You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our release branches are made by cherry picking commits from master (opt-in to changes). We've come far enough along that we can invert this to being opt-out. That is, branch off master and then apply commits that revert any changes deemed unsafe.
The content you are editing has changed. Please copy your edits and refresh the page.
Our intention was to abide by going with an opt-out flow. However, by the time we started trying to perform the merging, the release branch wasn't in an ideal spot, and doing the merging would have been more overhead. Specifically, there were some changes that landed that would have complicated the merging.
We still released from master, we just did so by cherry-picking instead of merging.
What is the Problem Being Solved?
Our release branches are made by cherry picking commits from master (opt-in to changes). We've come far enough along that we can invert this to being opt-out. That is, branch off master and then apply commits that revert any changes deemed unsafe.
Tasks
Description of the Design
Security Considerations
Scaling Considerations
Test Plan
Upgrade Considerations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: