Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

display network notices #94

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 19, 2023
Merged

display network notices #94

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

turadg
Copy link
Member

@turadg turadg commented Sep 18, 2023

Reads a notices list from https://main.agoric.net/network-config and displays them as toast to the user.

Also has a yarn upgrade for deps hygiene.

Test plan

Added this before the toast line to simulate data coming from network-config,

      config.notices = [
        {
          start: '2020-01-01',
          end: '2040-01-01',
          message:
            'Mainnet will be unavailable for up to a minute during a chain upgrade at 2023-09-21T19:37Z',
        },
      ];

toast demo

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Sep 18, 2023

Deploying with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 4ae6369
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://b20c5bf0.dapp-psm.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://ta-notices.dapp-psm.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Collaborator

@samsiegart samsiegart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was the yarn.lock change intentional?

type MinimalNetworkConfig = {
rpcAddrs: string[];
chainName: string;
notices?: NetworkNotice[];
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to have separate notices for PSM and Vaults?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we do I think that has to go somewhere else. this is config for the network. appropriate for things like pending upgrades.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense

});
for (const message of activeNotices(config)) {
toast.warn(message, { position: 'top-center' });
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to support multiple concurrent notices? It would be be cleaner functionally and aesthetically to reuse https://github.com/Agoric/dapp-psm/blob/main/src/components/AnnouncementBanner.tsx and put this logic in there. If there's multiple maybe we can rethink the design, because having a bunch of toasts pop up isn't ideal either. Not sure the priority of this though, if we have time to think it through more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good question. I figured there might be one or two max. And I didn't want to risk having someone defined multiple messages and one not go out due to client implemenation. (We don't have any validation tools on the production side.)

I think AnnouncementBanner makes sense for announcements, which can be delivered one a time and dismissed. "Ok, I saw it, got it." Whereas "notice" is more aggressive like, "DO NOT FORGET

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The announcement banner is what we've used for notices such as chain upgrades in the past. For multiple concurrent notices, I'm thinking it's sufficiently uncommon that showing multiple banners, or multiple rows in the banner, would be fine in that case. I think it should also show when the dapp loads, before the user has to connect their wallet. By doing it that way, the PR won't reinvent any of our existing UX, just make it more convenient to update the notice.

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
import { expect, it, describe } from 'vitest';
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yay tests

@turadg
Copy link
Member Author

turadg commented Sep 18, 2023

Was the yarn.lock change intentional?

Yeah, called out in the PR description and separated with a commit.

If you want it in a different PR lemme know. But I figure they're going to deploy together anyway.

@turadg turadg requested a review from samsiegart September 18, 2023 23:01
Copy link
Collaborator

@samsiegart samsiegart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, called out in the PR description and separated with a commit.

Ah okay thanks

@samsiegart
Copy link
Collaborator

Updated to use the banner
image

Copy link
Member Author

@turadg turadg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I opened the PR so I can't approve. I wish GH allowed transferring a PR.

I'm adding automerge so it'll land once you approve. Automerge can't be set until there's an approval. So just Approve and land at will.

@turadg turadg requested a review from samsiegart September 19, 2023 16:33
@turadg turadg dismissed samsiegart’s stale review September 19, 2023 16:33

Sam addressed his requested changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants