Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drake/feature/simulated uhf #64

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

DrakBoul
Copy link
Contributor

Created python programs for simulating uhf transceiver. One of these is a test program (generic_client.py).

Copy link
Member

@dheadrick1618 dheadrick1618 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks great!

Also you will have to resolve these pylint formatting errors before your branch can be merged:

Run pylint $(git ls-files '*.py')
************* Module UHF.generic_client
UHF/generic_client.py:53:0: W0311: Bad indentation. Found 16 spaces, expected 12 (bad-indentation)
UHF/generic_client.py:54:0: W0311: Bad indentation. Found 16 spaces, expected 12 (bad-indentation)
UHF/generic_client.py:55:0: W0311: Bad indentation. Found 20 spaces, expected 16 (bad-indentation)
UHF/generic_client.py:16:0: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)
UHF/generic_client.py:23:15: W0[7](https://github.com/AlbertaSat/ex3_simulated_subsystems/actions/runs/10001102874/job/27644142253?pr=64#step:5:8)18: Catching too general exception Exception (broad-exception-caught)
UHF/generic_client.py:30:0: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)
UHF/generic_client.py:5[8](https://github.com/AlbertaSat/ex3_simulated_subsystems/actions/runs/10001102874/job/27644142253?pr=64#step:5:9):15: W0718: Catching too general exception Exception (broad-exception-caught)
UHF/generic_client.py:30:0: R1710: Either all return statements in a function should return an expression, or none of them should. (inconsistent-return-statements)
************* Module UHF.simulated_uhf
UHF/simulated_uhf.py:5[9](https://github.com/AlbertaSat/ex3_simulated_subsystems/actions/runs/10001102874/job/27644142253?pr=64#step:5:10):21: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
UHF/simulated_uhf.py:105:26: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
UHF/simulated_uhf.py:66:19: W0718: Catching too general exception Exception (broad-exception-caught)
UHF/simulated_uhf.py:[10](https://github.com/AlbertaSat/ex3_simulated_subsystems/actions/runs/10001102874/job/27644142253?pr=64#step:5:11)5:11: W0718: Catching too general exception Exception (broad-exception-caught)
UHF/simulated_uhf.py:89:0: R1710: Either all return statements in a function should return an expression, or none of them should. (inconsistent-return-statements)
UHF/simulated_uhf.py:138:23: W0718: Catching too general exception Exception (broad-exception-caught)
UHF/simulated_uhf.py:172:15: W0718: Catching too general exception Exception (broad-exception-caught)
UHF/simulated_uhf.py:177:0: C0[11](https://github.com/AlbertaSat/ex3_simulated_subsystems/actions/runs/10001102874/job/27644142253?pr=64#step:5:12)6: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)

-----------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 9.84/10

UHF/simulated_uhf.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@DrakBoul DrakBoul requested a review from dheadrick1618 July 19, 2024 20:34
Copy link
Member

@dheadrick1618 dheadrick1618 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. This is enough to be used in the tall-thin command uplink architecture.

Thanks!

@dheadrick1618 dheadrick1618 merged commit 3b608db into main Jul 20, 2024
1 check passed
@DrakBoul DrakBoul deleted the drake/feature/simulated_uhf branch July 23, 2024 00:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants