[SMALLFIX] Remove unused objects initialize #18380
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for your pull request. |
lfyzjck
changed the title
|
alluxio-bot, merge this please |
ssz1997
pushed a commit
to ssz1997/alluxio
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
### What changes are proposed in this pull request? ### Why are the changes needed? `objects` is initialized by empty array but we never used this default value. ### Does this PR introduce any user facing changes? Please list the user-facing changes introduced by your change, including 1. change in user-facing APIs. no 2. addition or removal of property keys. no 3. webui. no pr-link: Alluxio#18380 change-id: cid-f16cc464ebc647d4c9be79b2151fb06c4ec71ed4
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Why are the changes needed?
objectsis initialized by empty array but we never used this default value.Does this PR introduce any user facing changes?
Please list the user-facing changes introduced by your change, including