fix: "to use this feature, add api" error dialog #1511
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request modify the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 5a1bafe in 20 seconds
More details
- Looked at
27lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. webview_panels/src/modules/app/useListeners.ts:27
- Draft comment:
Typo in function name: 'onMesssage' should be 'onMessage'. This typo is present in multiple places (lines 27, 98, 121, 124). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. webview_panels/src/modules/app/useListeners.ts:110
- Draft comment:
Avoid using hardcoded strings for pathnames. Consider using a constant or configuration for "/lineage" to improve maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The use of 'location.pathname !== "/lineage"' is a hardcoded check. It would be better to use a constant or configuration for the pathname to avoid magic strings.
3. webview_panels/src/modules/app/useListeners.ts:110
- Draft comment:
Good use of early return by checkinglocation.pathname !== "/lineage"before callingloadTenantInfo(). This reduces unnecessary nesting. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The functionloadTenantInfois called only if a condition is met, which is a good use of early returns to reduce nesting.
Workflow ID: wflow_xYpuLI9bWTiC7dX7
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
webview_panels/src/modules/app/useListeners.ts (1)
110-112: Consider a more robust error handling approach.While skipping tenant info loading prevents the error dialog, consider implementing a more comprehensive solution:
- Handle the error state gracefully in the lineage panel
- Show a more informative message about why credentials are needed
- Provide clear guidance on how to add the required credentials
This would improve the user experience by being more transparent about the requirements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
webview_panels/src/modules/app/useListeners.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
webview_panels/src/modules/app/useListeners.ts (2)
22-22: LGTM! Clean integration of React Router's location hook.
The useLocation hook is properly imported and used at the component level, following React hooks best practices.
Also applies to: 25-26
110-112: Verify tenant info loading behavior on other routes.
While skipping tenant info loading on the lineage path fixes the error dialog, we should ensure this doesn't impact other routes that might need this information.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Skipping tenant info loading on lineage route is safe
The tenant info is primarily used for:
- Enabling/disabling teammates features in documentation components
- Currency and frontend URL configuration
Looking at the available routes and component usage:
- The lineage route (
/lineage) doesn't use tenant info - Components that depend on tenant info (CoachAi, Citations) are only used in the documentation generator
- Other routes that need tenant info will still load it as expected
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for routes and components that might depend on tenant info
rg -l "tenantInfo|setTenantInfo" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for router configuration to understand available routes
rg -l "createBrowserRouter|Routes|Route" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for routes and components that might depend on tenant info, using just .ts extension
rg -l "tenantInfo|setTenantInfo" --type ts
# Search for router configuration to understand available routes
rg -l "createBrowserRouter|Routes|Route" --type ts
# Look for actual usage of tenant info in the codebase
rg "tenantInfo" --type ts -A 3
Length of output: 4082
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the router configuration to see all routes
rg -A 10 "const.*Routes.*=|createBrowserRouter" webview_panels/src/AppRoutes.tsx
# Check where loadTenantInfo is actually used
rg "loadTenantInfo" --type ts -A 3
# Check if there are any components that critically depend on tenantInfo being loaded immediately
rg "useEffect.*tenantInfo" --type ts -A 5
Length of output: 1411
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the available routes to understand the routing structure
rg "AvailableRoutes" --type ts -A 10
# Check for any immediate tenantInfo usage in component renders
rg "const.*=.*useAppContext\(\)" --type ts -A 3
# Look for the AppConstants file to understand route definitions
cat webview_panels/src/AppConstants.tsx
Length of output: 5815
| if (location.pathname !== "/lineage") { | ||
| loadTenantInfo(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add location to useEffect dependencies.
The useEffect hook uses the location value but doesn't include it in the dependency array. This could lead to stale values being used.
Apply this diff to fix the dependency array:
- }, [onMesssage]);
+ }, [onMesssage, location]);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 73501bf in 33 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts:320
- Draft comment:
The conditional checkparams.endpoint === "auth/tenant-info" ? false : trueis a good approach to prevent error dialogs for specific endpoints. Ensure that this logic is consistent with the intended behavior across the application. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%
The change in the PR modifies thehandleSyncRequestFromWebviewfunction call to conditionally setshowErrorNotificationbased on the endpoint. This is a logical change to prevent error dialogs for specific endpoints.
2. src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts:320
- Draft comment:
Consider using early returns to simplify the logic and improve readability. For example:
if (params.endpoint === "auth/tenant-info") return;
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment suggests a refactor to improve readability by using early returns. The current code uses a ternary operator to set a boolean value, which is a common pattern. The suggestion would change the logic structure, but it's not clear if it would improve readability in this context. The current pattern is straightforward and commonly used.
The suggestion might not actually improve readability, as the ternary operator is a concise and clear way to set a boolean value. The early return pattern might not be necessary here.
While early returns can improve readability in some cases, the current use of a ternary operator is already clear and concise. The suggestion might not provide a significant readability improvement.
The comment should be deleted as the current use of a ternary operator is clear and the suggested change does not provide a significant readability improvement.
Workflow ID: wflow_w7m6pHxPaznqGvYb
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (1)
320-320: Simplify the boolean expression while maintaining functionality.The change correctly prevents error notifications for the "auth/tenant-info" endpoint, which aligns with the PR objective. However, the boolean expression can be simplified.
- params.endpoint === "auth/tenant-info" ? false : true, + params.endpoint !== "auth/tenant-info",🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 320-320: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts
[error] 320-320: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (1)
320-320: Verify the fix resolves the lineage panel error dialog.
The change prevents error notifications when fetching tenant info, but let's verify this resolves the issue on the lineage panel.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 320-320: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Overview
Problem
When there are no credentials, then on lineage panel, the "to use feature..." error dialog shows up
Describe the problem you are solving. Mention the ticket/issue if applicable.
Solution
Describe the implemented solution. Add external references if needed.
Screenshot/Demo
A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.
How to test
Checklist
README.mdupdated and added information about my changeImportant
Fixes error dialog by adjusting
handleSyncRequestFromWebviewlogic forauth/tenant-infoendpoint inaltimateWebviewProvider.ts.handleSyncRequestFromWebviewto skip error notifications forauth/tenant-infoendpoint inaltimateWebviewProvider.ts.altimateWebviewProvider.tsto prevent unnecessary error dialogs.This description was created by
for 73501bf. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
fetchcommand, specifically for theauth/tenant-infoendpoint, to prevent unnecessary error notifications.Refactor