-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: lock undeploy endpoint #14549
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/src/Designer/Middleware/UserRequestSynchronization/Services/RequestSyncEvaluators/EndpointNameSyncEvaluator.cs (1)
77-78
: Consider documenting the synchronization behavior.Since this is a significant change affecting deployment operations, consider:
- Adding XML documentation comments explaining the synchronization behavior for the Undeploy action
- Updating user documentation to explain the implications of concurrent undeploy requests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
backend/src/Designer/Middleware/UserRequestSynchronization/Services/RequestSyncEvaluators/EndpointNameSyncEvaluator.cs
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: Build environment and run e2e test
- GitHub Check: Run dotnet build and test (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: Run dotnet build and test (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Analyze
- GitHub Check: Run integration tests against actual gitea and db
- GitHub Check: Run dotnet build and test (ubuntu-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/src/Designer/Middleware/UserRequestSynchronization/Services/RequestSyncEvaluators/EndpointNameSyncEvaluator.cs (1)
77-78
: LGTM! Implementation follows best practices.The addition of
Undeploy
to the whitelist is well-implemented, following the established pattern and maintaining type safety throughnameof
. This change will ensure undeploy operations are properly synchronized.Please verify the behavior with concurrent undeploy requests to ensure they are properly queued/synchronized. Run this script to find the implementation of the Undeploy action:
✅ Verification successful
✓ Undeploy endpoint is properly synchronized
The implementation follows best practices for request synchronization:
- Synchronized at controller level using the middleware
- Uses thread-safe collections and proper validation
- Follows the same proven pattern as the Create endpoint
- Has proper authorization and error handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the Undeploy action implementation to review concurrent handling ast-grep --pattern 'public $_ Undeploy($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, find the DeploymentsController file fd -e cs "DeploymentsController" # Then search for any undeploy methods with various casings rg -i "undeploy|unDeploy" -A 5 -B 1Length of output: 62916
Description
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
Summary by CodeRabbit