Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: lock undeploy endpoint #14549

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

chore: lock undeploy endpoint #14549

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

mirkoSekulic
Copy link
Collaborator

@mirkoSekulic mirkoSekulic commented Jan 30, 2025

Description

Related Issue(s)

  • #{issue number}

Verification

  • Your code builds clean without any errors or warnings
  • Manual testing done (required)
  • Relevant automated test added (if you find this hard, leave it and we'll help out)

Documentation

  • User documentation is updated with a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs. (if applicable)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced deployment synchronization by adding support for the Undeploy action in the DeploymentsController.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the EndpointNameSyncEvaluator class in the backend middleware for user request synchronization. Specifically, it adds the Undeploy action from the DeploymentsController to the existing whitelist of synchronizable actions. This change expands the criteria for request synchronization by including the Undeploy method alongside the previously whitelisted Create action, without altering any other aspects of the synchronization logic.

Changes

File Change Summary
backend/src/Designer/.../EndpointNameSyncEvaluator.cs Added nameof(DeploymentsController.Undeploy) to the whitelist of synchronizable actions

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

solution/studio/designer, backend

Suggested reviewers

  • mlqn
  • JamalAlabdullah

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mirkoSekulic mirkoSekulic self-assigned this Jan 30, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added solution/studio/designer Issues related to the Altinn Studio Designer solution. backend labels Jan 30, 2025
@mirkoSekulic mirkoSekulic added team/studio-core and removed solution/studio/designer Issues related to the Altinn Studio Designer solution. backend labels Jan 30, 2025
@mirkoSekulic mirkoSekulic enabled auto-merge (squash) January 30, 2025 12:30
@mirkoSekulic mirkoSekulic added the skip-manual-testing PRs that do not need to be tested manually label Jan 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/src/Designer/Middleware/UserRequestSynchronization/Services/RequestSyncEvaluators/EndpointNameSyncEvaluator.cs (1)

77-78: Consider documenting the synchronization behavior.

Since this is a significant change affecting deployment operations, consider:

  1. Adding XML documentation comments explaining the synchronization behavior for the Undeploy action
  2. Updating user documentation to explain the implications of concurrent undeploy requests
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36eb57a and 90b3098.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/src/Designer/Middleware/UserRequestSynchronization/Services/RequestSyncEvaluators/EndpointNameSyncEvaluator.cs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: Build environment and run e2e test
  • GitHub Check: Run dotnet build and test (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run dotnet build and test (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze
  • GitHub Check: Run integration tests against actual gitea and db
  • GitHub Check: Run dotnet build and test (ubuntu-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/src/Designer/Middleware/UserRequestSynchronization/Services/RequestSyncEvaluators/EndpointNameSyncEvaluator.cs (1)

77-78: LGTM! Implementation follows best practices.

The addition of Undeploy to the whitelist is well-implemented, following the established pattern and maintaining type safety through nameof. This change will ensure undeploy operations are properly synchronized.

Please verify the behavior with concurrent undeploy requests to ensure they are properly queued/synchronized. Run this script to find the implementation of the Undeploy action:

✅ Verification successful

✓ Undeploy endpoint is properly synchronized

The implementation follows best practices for request synchronization:

  • Synchronized at controller level using the middleware
  • Uses thread-safe collections and proper validation
  • Follows the same proven pattern as the Create endpoint
  • Has proper authorization and error handling
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the Undeploy action implementation to review concurrent handling
ast-grep --pattern 'public $_ Undeploy($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 56


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, find the DeploymentsController file
fd -e cs "DeploymentsController"

# Then search for any undeploy methods with various casings
rg -i "undeploy|unDeploy" -A 5 -B 1

Length of output: 62916

@mirkoSekulic mirkoSekulic merged commit 04d5a34 into main Jan 30, 2025
16 checks passed
@mirkoSekulic mirkoSekulic deleted the chore/add-lock-to-undeploy branch January 30, 2025 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-manual-testing PRs that do not need to be tested manually team/studio-core
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants