Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Fix NullReferenceException on Content validation #1155

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

MagnusSandgren
Copy link
Collaborator

@MagnusSandgren MagnusSandgren commented Sep 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved validation logic for media type comparisons, enhancing clarity and readability.
  • Refactor

    • Updated string comparison method for better intent regarding case sensitivity.

@MagnusSandgren MagnusSandgren requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 08:02
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the validation logic in the ContentValueDtoValidator class, specifically for comparing the MediaType property of the Value. The original comparison method has been changed from Equals to string.Equals, enhancing the clarity of the code regarding string comparisons. The validation rule for Markdown media types remains unchanged, indicating that the focus of the modification is on improving the string comparison logic for HTML media types.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/Common/Content/ContentValueDtoValidator.cs Updated the media type comparison logic from Equals to string.Equals for better clarity.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI o1 for code reviews: OpenAI's new o1 model is being tested for code reviews. This model has advanced reasoning capabilities and can provide more nuanced feedback on your code.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

@MagnusSandgren MagnusSandgren merged commit 852b352 into main Sep 18, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@MagnusSandgren MagnusSandgren deleted the chore/fix-nullreferenceexception-in-validator branch September 18, 2024 08:04
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants