feat: Add masstransit outbox system #1277
Conversation
…alOutbox # Conflicts: # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.csproj # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/Outboxes/Commands/Delete/DeleteOutboxMessagesCommand.cs # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.ChangeDataCapture/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.ChangeDataCapture.csproj # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.csproj # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Interceptors/ConvertDomainEventsToOutboxMessagesInterceptor.cs # tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests.csproj # tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Unit.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Unit.Tests.csproj
…alOutbox # Conflicts: # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.csproj # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.csproj
# Conflicts: # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.csproj # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/Common/Content/ContentValueDtoValidator.cs # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.csproj # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs
MagnusSandgren
changed the title
# Conflicts: # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/Common/Extensions/AzureAppConfigurationExtensions.cs # src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service.csproj # src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/AzureAppConfigurationExtensions.cs
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across various files. A new constructor has been added to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 42
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (52)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.ChangeDataCapture/ChangeDataCaptureAssemblyMarker.cs (1)
5-8: Approved: Good improvement in class design.The change from
public statictopublic sealedis a positive modification. It maintains the class's purpose as an assembly marker while allowing for potential future instance members if needed. This change also prevents inheritance, which is appropriate for a marker class.Consider adding a brief XML documentation comment to explain the purpose of this class:
+ /// <summary> + /// Marker class for the Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.ChangeDataCapture assembly. + /// </summary> public sealed class ChangeDataCaptureAssemblyMarker { public static readonly Assembly Assembly = typeof(ChangeDataCaptureAssemblyMarker).Assembly; }This addition would improve code documentation and make the class's purpose clearer to other developers.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.json (1)
2-6: LGTM! Consider environment-specific logging configurations.The addition of the "Logging" section with a default log level of "Warning" is appropriate for production environments. However, for a more flexible setup, consider implementing environment-specific logging configurations.
You might want to create separate
appsettings.{Environment}.jsonfiles (e.g.,appsettings.Development.json,appsettings.Staging.json) with different log levels for various environments. This approach allows for more verbose logging in non-production environments without modifying the main configuration file.tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Common/TestDomainEventConsumer.cs (2)
7-15: LGTM: Class definition and constructor are well-designed.The
TestDomainEventConsumer<T>class is well-structured:
- It correctly implements
IConsumer<T>for MassTransit integration.- The generic constraint
where T : class, IDomainEventensures type safety.- The constructor properly initializes the
_publisherfield with a null check.Consider adding XML documentation to the class and constructor to improve code readability and maintainability. For example:
/// <summary> /// Represents a test consumer for domain events in integration tests. /// </summary> /// <typeparam name="T">The type of the domain event, which must implement IDomainEvent.</typeparam> internal sealed class TestDomainEventConsumer<T> : IConsumer<T> where T : class, IDomainEvent { private readonly IPublisher _publisher; /// <summary> /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="TestDomainEventConsumer{T}"/> class. /// </summary> /// <param name="publisher">The publisher used to publish consumed messages.</param> /// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException">Thrown if <paramref name="publisher"/> is null.</exception> public TestDomainEventConsumer(IPublisher publisher) { _publisher = publisher ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(publisher)); } }
17-17: LGTM: Consume method is concise and effective.The
Consumemethod efficiently implements theIConsumer<T>interface:
- It correctly forwards the consumed message to the publisher.
- The use of an expression-bodied member keeps the code concise.
Consider adding XML documentation to the method to improve code readability:
/// <summary> /// Consumes the specified domain event and publishes it using the internal publisher. /// </summary> /// <param name="context">The consume context containing the domain event.</param> /// <returns>A task representing the asynchronous operation.</returns> public async Task Consume(ConsumeContext<T> context) => await _publisher.Publish(context.Message);src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/MediaTypes.cs (1)
16-23: LGTM: NewDomainExtensionsclass looks good, but consider performance.The new
DomainExtensionsclass and itsGetDomainEventTypes()method are well-implemented for retrieving all concrete implementations ofIDomainEventfrom the domain assembly. The filtering criteria are appropriate, excluding abstract classes, interfaces, and generic types.However, be aware that this method could be expensive if called frequently, as it uses reflection to scan the assembly.
Consider caching the result of this method if it's expected to be called multiple times, as the set of domain event types is unlikely to change during runtime. Here's a suggested implementation:
public static class DomainExtensions { private static readonly Lazy<IEnumerable<Type>> _domainEventTypes = new Lazy<IEnumerable<Type>>(GetDomainEventTypesInternal); public static IEnumerable<Type> GetDomainEventTypes() => _domainEventTypes.Value; private static IEnumerable<Type> GetDomainEventTypesInternal() => DomainAssemblyMarker.Assembly .GetTypes() .Where(x => !x.IsAbstract && !x.IsInterface && !x.IsGenericType) .Where(x => x.IsAssignableTo(typeof(IDomainEvent))) .ToList(); // Materialize the list to avoid multiple enumerations }This approach uses lazy initialization to cache the result, ensuring the expensive reflection operation only occurs once, the first time the method is called.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Outboxes/OutboxMessage.cs (1)
Line range hint
29-29: Implement proper correlation id strategyThere's a TODO comment regarding setting the correlation id. Currently, a new GUID is being used as a placeholder, which may not be the intended final implementation.
Consider implementing a proper correlation id strategy that aligns with your system's requirements. This could involve:
- Propagating an existing correlation id from the incoming request.
- Using a more meaningful identifier that can be traced across your system.
- Implementing a custom correlation id generator that follows a specific format or pattern.
Once implemented, remove the TODO comment.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/NotificationAcknowledgement.cs (1)
14-23: LGTM: Well-implementedNotificationAcknowledgementConfigurationwith a minor suggestion.The
NotificationAcknowledgementConfigurationclass is well-implemented:
- Correct use of
IEntityTypeConfiguration<T>for entity configuration.- Appropriate composite primary key and index setup.
- Good use of
Constants.DefaultMaxStringLengthfor consistency.- Correct default value for
AcknowledgedAtusing UTC timestamp.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the index on
EventId. This can help future maintainers understand the performance considerations.builder.HasIndex(x => x.EventId); +// Index on EventId to improve query performance when searching for specific eventstests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Architecture.Tests/InfrastructureArchitectureTests.cs (1)
27-27: Approved: Improved test accuracy by excluding interfaces.The addition of
.And().AreNotInterfaces()is a good improvement to the test. It ensures that only classes, not interfaces, are checked for being internal, which aligns with the test's purpose.Consider updating the test method name to explicitly mention that it's checking classes only:
- public void All_Classes_In_Infrastructure_Should_Be_Internal() + public void All_Non_Interface_Classes_In_Infrastructure_Should_Be_Internal()This change would make the test's purpose even clearer and align it perfectly with the implementation.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Development/DevelopmentSubjectResourceSyncHostedService.cs (1)
Line range hint
22-31: Consider adding error handling in the StartAsync method.While the current implementation is functional, it might be beneficial to add error handling to the
StartAsyncmethod. This would help catch and log any exceptions that might occur during the synchronization process, making debugging easier in development environments.Here's a suggested improvement:
public async Task StartAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken) { if (!_environment.IsDevelopment()) { return; } - using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope(); - var sender = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<ISender>(); - - await sender.Send(new SynchronizeSubjectResourceMappingsCommand(), cancellationToken); + try + { + using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope(); + var sender = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<ISender>(); + + await sender.Send(new SynchronizeSubjectResourceMappingsCommand(), cancellationToken); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + // Consider injecting ILogger and using it here + Console.WriteLine($"Error during subject resource synchronization: {ex.Message}"); + // Optionally re-throw if you want to prevent the application from starting + // throw; + } }This change wraps the synchronization process in a try-catch block, allowing you to handle and log any exceptions that might occur during the process. You might want to inject an
ILoggerinstance for proper logging instead of usingConsole.WriteLine.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/LocalDevelopmentSettings.cs (1)
18-18: Consider usinginitfor consistency with other properties.The new property
UseInMemoryServiceBusTransportuses a setter (set) instead of an init-only setter (init) which is used by most other properties in this class. While this might be intentional to allow post-initialization changes, it's worth considering usinginitfor consistency unless there's a specific reason for allowing the property to be modified after object creation.Could you clarify why
setis used here instead ofinit? If there's no specific requirement for post-initialization modification, consider changing it to:- public bool UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport { get; set; } = true; + public bool UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport { get; init; } = true;src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.csproj (1)
Line range hint
1-31: Overall assessment of the project file changesThe update to the Azure.Identity package appears to be the only change in this file. While this is a minor version update and likely includes improvements or bug fixes, it's important to:
- Test thoroughly to ensure the update doesn't introduce any regression or compatibility issues.
- Update the project's documentation to reflect this change, if necessary.
- Consider reviewing and potentially updating other Azure-related packages to maintain consistency across the project.
As a general practice, consider implementing a dependency management strategy that includes regular reviews and updates of all packages. This can help maintain security, take advantage of new features, and avoid potential conflicts from mismatched dependency versions.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241011204951_AddNotificationAcknowledgementTable.cs (1)
11-31: LGTM:Upmethod is well-structured with room for minor improvements.The
Upmethod correctly creates theNotificationAcknowledgementtable with appropriate columns and constraints. Good practices observed:
- Composite primary key ensures uniqueness.
- Index on
EventIdwill improve query performance.- Using UTC for the timestamp ensures consistency.
Consider these potential improvements:
- Add a non-clustered index on
NotificationHandlerif it will be frequently queried.- Add a comment to the
AcknowledgedAtcolumn explaining its purpose.Would you like me to provide the SQL for these suggested improvements?
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json (2)
27-43: Application configuration is well-structured.The Application section is properly configured with the necessary settings for Dialogporten. The use of Primary and Secondary Ed25519 key pairs suggests a robust key rotation mechanism.
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the Secondary key pair, e.g., for key rotation or as a backup.
1-44: Overall structure is good, but consider JSON standard compliance.The configuration file is well-structured and clearly organized. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
Comments in JSON: While comments provide useful context, they are not part of the JSON standard. Consider moving these comments to a separate documentation file or README to ensure strict JSON compliance.
Static Analysis Warnings: The static analysis tool reported errors, but these appear to be false positives, likely due to the presence of comments. If you need to keep the comments, you may want to configure the static analysis tool to ignore them or switch to a JSON5 format if that's an option for your project.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 19-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 19-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json (1)
30-46: LGTM: Application configuration is well-structured. Consider documenting key rotation.The Application configuration for Dialogporten is well-structured and secure:
- The BaseUri is consistent with the Altinn configuration, correctly pointing to the "tt02" test environment.
- Ed25519KeyPairs are properly defined with both Primary and Secondary keys, which is excellent for key rotation purposes.
- All sensitive key components (Kid, PrivateComponent, PublicComponent) correctly use placeholders.
Suggestion: Consider adding documentation or comments explaining the key rotation process and when/how the Secondary key should be used. This will help maintain security practices over time.
Would you like me to draft a comment explaining the key rotation process to be added to this configuration file?
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json (1)
1-47: Consider using a JSON5 or JSONC format for configuration files.The configuration file is well-structured and easy to read. However, the use of comments in JSON files is not standard and may cause issues with some JSON parsers. Consider using JSON5 or JSONC (JSON with Comments) format if you want to keep the comments, which can be beneficial for documentation purposes.
If you decide to keep the current format, ensure that your configuration parsing mechanism can handle these comments correctly.
Note: The static analysis tool reported errors due to these comments, but these can be safely ignored as they are false positives in this context.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json (2)
32-48: LGTM! Secure key configuration structure in place.The "Application" section is well-structured with appropriate placeholders for sensitive Ed25519 key pair information. The use of primary and secondary key pairs is a good practice for key rotation.
As mentioned in the comment, make sure to use the
Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.Ed25519KeyPairGeneratortool to generate the actual key pairs and add them to your local secrets.Would you like assistance in generating a script to run the Ed25519KeyPairGenerator tool?
1-62: Consider using a JSON5 or JSONC format for configuration.The configuration file includes comments, which provide valuable context but are not part of the standard JSON specification. While many JSON parsers are lenient and allow comments, it's not universally supported and may cause issues with some tools.
To maintain the benefits of comments while ensuring broader compatibility, consider one of these options:
- Use JSON5 or JSONC (JSON with Comments) format, which officially supports comments.
- If you must stick with standard JSON, move the comments to separate documentation or use meaningful key names to convey the same information.
The current approach prioritizes developer understanding, which is valuable, but be aware of potential parsing issues in different environments.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/AzureAppConfigurationExtensions.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-93: Consider adding XML documentation to public methods.While the class and its methods are well-structured, consider adding XML documentation to all public methods. This would improve the API documentation and make it easier for consumers of this now-public class to understand its usage.
For example, you could add documentation to the
AddAzureConfigurationmethod like this:/// <summary> /// Adds Azure App Configuration to the configuration builder if AZURE_APPCONFIG_URI is set. /// </summary> /// <param name="config">The configuration manager to extend.</param> /// <param name="environment">The environment label to use for configuration selection.</param> /// <param name="credential">The token credential to use for authentication. If null, DefaultAzureCredential is used.</param> /// <param name="refreshRate">The refresh rate for the configuration. If null, defaults to 1 minute.</param> /// <returns>The updated IConfigurationBuilder.</returns> public static IConfigurationBuilder AddAzureConfiguration( this ConfigurationManager config, string? environment, TokenCredential? credential = null, TimeSpan? refreshRate = null)src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureSettings.cs (2)
16-16: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The addition of the
MassTransitproperty is good, as it integrates MassTransit configuration into the infrastructure settings. Therequiredkeyword ensures that this critical configuration is always provided.Consider using
initinstead ofsetfor theMassTransitproperty to make it immutable after initialization:- public required MassTransitSettings MassTransit { get; set; } + public required MassTransitSettings MassTransit { get; init; }This change would align with the immutability pattern used in other properties of this class and prevent accidental modifications after initialization.
19-22: LGTM with a suggestion for potential expansion.The
MassTransitSettingsclass is a good start for encapsulating MassTransit-specific configuration. Therequiredkeyword andinitsetter on theHostproperty ensure it's set during initialization and immutable afterwards, which is appropriate for configuration properties.Consider expanding this class to include other common MassTransit configuration options. For example:
public sealed class MassTransitSettings { public required string Host { get; init; } public int? Port { get; init; } public string? Username { get; init; } public string? Password { get; init; } public bool UseSsl { get; init; } // Add other relevant MassTransit configuration properties as needed }This expansion would provide a more comprehensive configuration structure for MassTransit, allowing for greater flexibility in different deployment scenarios.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Interceptors/PopulateActorNameInterceptor.cs (3)
Line range hint
70-75: Consider using a different exception typeThe use of
UnreachableExceptionhere might be too strong. This exception is typically used for code paths that should never be reached. In this case, it's conceivable that the dictionary might not contain a record for every actor ID due to unexpected runtime conditions.Consider using a more specific exception type, such as
InvalidOperationException, which better reflects the nature of the error:if (!actorNameById.TryGetValue(actor.ActorId!, out var actorName)) { throw new InvalidOperationException( $"Expected {nameof(actorNameById)} to contain a record for every " + $"actor id. Missing record for actor id: {actor.ActorId}. Is " + $"the lookup method implemented correctly?"); }
Line range hint
80-84: Clarify special handling for DialogSeenLogSeenByActorThe code skips error logging for
DialogSeenLogSeenByActorwhen an actor name is not found. While the comment explains the rationale, it might be beneficial to extract this logic into a separate method for clarity and potential reuse. For example:private bool ShouldSkipErrorLogging(Actor actor) { return actor is DialogSeenLogSeenByActor; } // Usage in the main method: if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(actorName)) { if (ShouldSkipErrorLogging(actor)) { continue; } // ... rest of the error handling }This change would make the special case more explicit and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
28-95: Consider refactoring for improved readabilityThe
SavingChangesAsyncmethod is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused methods. This would improve readability and make the code easier to maintain. Here's a suggested refactoring:public override async ValueTask<InterceptionResult<int>> SavingChangesAsync( DbContextEventData eventData, InterceptionResult<int> result, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default) { if (_hasBeenExecuted || eventData.Context is null) { return await base.SavingChangesAsync(eventData, result, cancellationToken); } var actors = GetActorsToUpdate(eventData.Context); var actorNameById = await FetchActorNames(actors, cancellationToken); UpdateActorNames(actors, actorNameById); _hasBeenExecuted = true; return !_domainContext.IsValid ? InterceptionResult<int>.SuppressWithResult(0) : await base.SavingChangesAsync(eventData, result, cancellationToken); } private List<Actor> GetActorsToUpdate(DbContext dbContext) { // ... implementation } private async Task<Dictionary<string, string?>> FetchActorNames(List<Actor> actors, CancellationToken cancellationToken) { // ... implementation } private void UpdateActorNames(List<Actor> actors, Dictionary<string, string?> actorNameById) { // ... implementation }This refactoring would make the main method more concise and easier to understand at a glance, while moving the implementation details into separate, focused methods.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/ApplicationExtensions.cs (1)
37-42: LGTM: Enhanced MediatR configuration.The expanded MediatR configuration is a good improvement:
- The
TypeEvaluatorprovides more control over type registration, which can help in managing the application's complexity.- Using
TaskWhenAllPublishercan potentially improve performance when dealing with multiple notification handlers.These changes align well with the PR's objective of adding a masstransit outbox system by refining the event handling process.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
IIgnoreOnAssemblyScaninterface for better code documentation:x.RegisterServicesFromAssembly(thisAssembly); +// Exclude types marked with IIgnoreOnAssemblyScan from MediatR registration x.TypeEvaluator = type => !type.IsAssignableTo(typeof(IIgnoreOnAssemblyScan)); x.NotificationPublisherType = typeof(TaskWhenAllPublisher);src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs (1)
Line range hint
93-114: Consider refactoring theUpdateSeenAtmethod for improved readability.The
UpdateSeenAtmethod contains complex logic for updating theSeenLogand adding a domain event. To improve readability and maintainability, consider refactoring this method by extracting some of its logic into separate, well-named methods. For example:public void UpdateSeenAt(string endUserId, DialogUserType.Values userTypeId, string? endUserName) { if (ShouldUpdateSeenLog(endUserId)) { AddSeenLogEntry(endUserId, userTypeId, endUserName); AddDialogSeenDomainEvent(); } } private bool ShouldUpdateSeenLog(string endUserId) { var lastSeenAt = GetLastSeenAt(endUserId); return lastSeenAt < UpdatedAt; } private DateTimeOffset GetLastSeenAt(string endUserId) { return SeenLog .Where(x => x.SeenBy.ActorId == endUserId) .MaxBy(x => x.CreatedAt) ?.CreatedAt ?? DateTimeOffset.MinValue; } private void AddSeenLogEntry(string endUserId, DialogUserType.Values userTypeId, string? endUserName) { SeenLog.Add(new() { EndUserTypeId = userTypeId, IsViaServiceOwner = userTypeId == DialogUserType.Values.ServiceOwnerOnBehalfOfPerson, SeenBy = new DialogSeenLogSeenByActor { ActorTypeId = ActorType.Values.PartyRepresentative, ActorId = endUserId, ActorName = endUserName } }); } private void AddDialogSeenDomainEvent() { _domainEvents.Add(new DialogSeenDomainEvent(Id, ServiceResource, Party, Process, PrecedingProcess)); }This refactoring improves readability by breaking down the complex method into smaller, more focused methods with clear responsibilities.
src/Digdir.Library.Entity.EntityFrameworkCore/EntityLibraryEfCoreExtensions.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectives, but impact verification is crucial.The modifications in this file are consistent with the PR's objective of removing outbox-related functionality and streamlining the architecture. The changes primarily involve:
- Commenting out calls to
HandleVersionableEntities()andHandleUpdatableEntities()in theHandleAuditableEntitiesmethod.- Removing the
AddEventPublisher()call from theAddAuditableEntitiesmethod.These changes align with the shift away from event publishing functionality mentioned in the PR summary. However, to ensure the integrity of the system, please:
- Thoroughly test the impact of these changes on entity versioning, updating, and any components that may have relied on event publishing.
- Update the documentation for both modified methods to accurately reflect their current functionality.
- Review and update any related configuration files or dependent code that may be affected by these changes.
Consider creating a migration plan to handle any potential breaking changes caused by the removal of event publishing functionality. This may include:
- Identifying and updating any services or components that relied on the removed functionality.
- Ensuring that the new architecture provides alternative means to achieve the same goals, if necessary.
- Updating relevant documentation and developer guidelines to reflect the architectural changes.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241011204951_AddNotificationAcknowledgementTable.Designer.cs (2)
1278-1297: LGTM! Consider adding an index on NotificationHandler.The
NotificationAcknowledgementtable structure is well-designed for tracking notification acknowledgments. The composite primary key ofEventIdandNotificationHandlerallows for multiple handlers to acknowledge the same event, which is a good practice.Consider adding an index on the
NotificationHandlercolumn if you anticipate querying acknowledgments by handler frequently. This can improve query performance:b.HasIndex(x => x.NotificationHandler);
1-2127: LGTM! Migration is additive and non-disruptive.This migration adds the
NotificationAcknowledgementtable without modifying any existing schema elements. This additive approach is generally safer and less likely to cause issues with existing data or functionality.When planning future migrations, continue this practice of making additive changes when possible, as it minimizes the risk of data loss or application disruption. If you need to make changes to existing structures, consider breaking them into multiple migrations: one to add new structures, another to migrate data, and a final one to remove old structures if necessary.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/IdempotentNotificationHandler.cs (1)
24-36: Ensure thread safety to prevent race conditionsWhen handling notifications in a concurrent environment, there's a risk of race conditions where multiple instances might process the same notification simultaneously. This can lead to duplicate processing if
HandlerIsAckedreturnsfalsefor multiple threads before any has acknowledged the handler.Verify that the underlying
HandlerIsAckedandAckHandlermethods inINotificationProcessingContextare thread-safe and properly synchronize access to prevent concurrent processing of the same notification. Consider leveraging database transactions or distributed locks to ensure idempotency in a multi-threaded or multi-server environment.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs (7)
35-40: Appropriateness of Exception Type and MessageIn
GetExistingContext, when a context is not found, anInvalidOperationExceptionis thrown with the message "Notification context not found." Consider whether a more specific exception type, likeKeyNotFoundException, would be more appropriate to convey the exact nature of the error.Apply this diff to change the exception:
- : throw new InvalidOperationException("Notification context not found."); + : throw new KeyNotFoundException($"Notification context with EventId '{eventId}' not found.");
37-40: Simplify the Return Statement for ClarityThe ternary operator in the return statement may reduce readability, especially with multi-line formatting.
Consider rewriting the return statement using an
ifstatement:-return _contextByEventId.TryGetValue(eventId, out var transaction) - ? transaction - : throw new InvalidOperationException("Notification context not found."); +if (_contextByEventId.TryGetValue(eventId, out var transaction)) +{ + return transaction; +} +throw new KeyNotFoundException($"Notification context with EventId '{eventId}' not found.");
42-42: Rename Method for Consistency and ClarityThe method
RemoveTransactionoperates on contexts. To maintain consistent terminology, consider renaming it toRemoveContext.Apply this diff to rename the method:
-private void RemoveTransaction(Guid eventId) => _contextByEventId.TryRemove(eventId, out _); +private void RemoveContext(Guid eventId) => _contextByEventId.TryRemove(eventId, out _);Also, update its references:
-valueFactory: eventId => new(_serviceScopeFactory, eventId, onDispose: RemoveTransaction)); +valueFactory: eventId => new(_serviceScopeFactory, eventId, onDispose: RemoveContext));
23-26: Adjust Parameter Order for Common .NET PracticesIn the
CreateContextmethod, theCancellationTokenparameter is not the last parameter. According to common .NET practices, cancellation tokens are typically the last parameter in method signatures.Apply this diff to adjust the parameter order:
-public async Task<INotificationProcessingContext> CreateContext( - IDomainEvent domainEvent, - bool isFirstAttempt = false, - CancellationToken cancellationToken = default) +public async Task<INotificationProcessingContext> CreateContext( + IDomainEvent domainEvent, + CancellationToken cancellationToken = default, + bool isFirstAttempt = false)
1-3: Remove Unused Using DirectivesThe using directive
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.Common.EventPublisher;on line 2 might be unnecessary ifIDomainEventis not part of that namespace or if it's already included elsewhere.Would you like me to verify and remove any unused using directives?
13-43: Consider Implementing IDisposable if NecessaryGiven that
NotificationProcessingContextFactorymanages the lifecycle of contexts and may hold onto unmanaged resources viaIServiceScopeFactory, consider implementingIDisposableon the factory itself to ensure all resources are properly released.
18-21: Null-Checking SimplificationThe constructor is performing a null check on
serviceScopeFactoryand throwing anArgumentNullExceptionif it isnull.Since C# 8.0, you can use nullable reference types and the
ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNullmethod for more concise code.Apply this diff to simplify the null check:
-public NotificationProcessingContextFactory(IServiceScopeFactory serviceScopeFactory) -{ - _serviceScopeFactory = serviceScopeFactory ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(serviceScopeFactory)); -} +public NotificationProcessingContextFactory(IServiceScopeFactory serviceScopeFactory) +{ + ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(serviceScopeFactory); + _serviceScopeFactory = serviceScopeFactory; +}src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Consumers/DomainEventConsumer.cs (2)
16-18: Simplify constructor by leveraging dependency injection guaranteesThe constructor includes null checks for dependencies injected via dependency injection. Since the DI container ensures that these services are provided, the null checks may be unnecessary. Removing them can simplify the code.
Consider updating the constructor:
public DomainEventConsumer(IPublisher publisher, INotificationProcessingContextFactory notificationProcessingContextFactory) { - _publisher = publisher ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(publisher)); - _notificationProcessingContextFactory = notificationProcessingContextFactory ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(notificationProcessingContextFactory)); + _publisher = publisher; + _notificationProcessingContextFactory = notificationProcessingContextFactory; }
11-12: Ensure consistent ordering of private fieldsFor improved readability and maintainability, consider ordering the private readonly fields in a consistent manner, such as alphabetically or by their significance.
Example:
private readonly INotificationProcessingContextFactory _notificationProcessingContextFactory; private readonly IPublisher _publisher;src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/Common/Content/ContentValueDtoValidator.cs (2)
Line range hint
23-27: Simplify null check in 'Must' clauseSince
MediaTypeis already validated as not empty with.NotEmpty(), the null checkvalue is not nullin the.Must(...)clause is redundant. You can simplify the code by removing the unnecessary null check.Here's the suggested change:
RuleFor(x => x.MediaType) .NotEmpty() - .Must(value => value is not null && allowedMediaTypes.Contains(value)) + .Must(value => allowedMediaTypes.Contains(value)) .WithMessage($"{{PropertyName}} '{{PropertyValue}}' is not allowed for content type {contentType.Name}. " + $"Allowed media types are {string.Join(", ", allowedMediaTypes.Select(x => $"'{x}'"))}");
Line range hint
29-32: Remove redundant null check in 'When' conditionThe
MediaTypeproperty has already been validated to be not empty, so the null checkx.MediaType is not nullin theWhencondition is unnecessary. Simplifying the condition improves code readability.Suggested change:
When(x => - x.MediaType is not null x.MediaType.StartsWith(MediaTypes.EmbeddablePrefix, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase), () => { RuleForEach(x => x.Value) .ChildRules(x => x .RuleFor(x => x.Value) .IsValidHttpsUrl()); });src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContext.cs (2)
15-120: Consider implementing proper disposal patternsThe class
NotificationProcessingContextimplementsIAsyncDisposablebut does not implement the synchronousIDisposableinterface. If consumers of this class use it in ausingstatement instead of anawait usingstatement, resources may not be disposed correctly.Consider also implementing
IDisposableto handle both synchronous and asynchronous disposal patterns:internal sealed class NotificationProcessingContext : INotificationProcessingContext, IDisposable { // Existing code... public void Dispose() { DisposeAsync().AsTask().GetAwaiter().GetResult(); } }
117-118: Exception message may not accurately describe the issueThe exception message in
EnsureInitializedstates: "Transaction not initialized." However, the context is about the initialization of the processing context, not a transaction.Consider updating the exception message for clarity:
throw new InvalidOperationException("Transaction not initialized."); +throw new InvalidOperationException("NotificationProcessingContext is not initialized.");src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureBuilder.cs (2)
38-39: Initialize lists using explicit type for clarityWhile using target-typed
newexpressions is acceptable, explicitly specifying the type can improve readability, especially for collections.Consider updating the list initializations:
-private readonly List<Action<InfrastructureBuilderContext>> _actions = []; -private readonly List<Action<IBusRegistrationConfigurator>> _busConfigurations = []; +private readonly List<Action<InfrastructureBuilderContext>> _actions = new List<Action<InfrastructureBuilderContext>>(); +private readonly List<Action<IBusRegistrationConfigurator>> _busConfigurations = new List<Action<IBusRegistrationConfigurator>>();
71-71: Ensure proper execution order of actionsWhen adding actions via
AddAction, ensure that the order of execution is intentional. Actions are executed in the order they are added. Documenting this behavior can help maintainers understand the sequence.Consider adding comments or documentation about the execution order of actions in
_actions.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/DialogDbContext.cs (1)
116-132: MassTransit transactional outbox integration is correctly configuredThe use of
.ApplyConfigurationsFromAssemblyand.AddTransactionalOutboxEntitiesmethods properly integrates MassTransit's transactional outbox into the context. The temporary workaround for setting property max lengths to null is aptly noted with a reference to the MassTransit commit. Please ensure to monitor MassTransit's releases and remove the workaround when the fix is included in a future release.tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/Common/Events/DomainEventsTests.cs (1)
95-95: Review usage of null-forgiving operatorIn several places,
createDialogCommand.Id!.Valueis used with the null-forgiving operator!. Ensure thatIdis guaranteed not to benullat these points. If there's a possibility thatIdcould benull, consider adding null checks to prevent potentialNullReferenceExceptions.Also applies to: 105-105, 134-134, 158-158
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/CreateDialogTests.cs (1)
Line range hint
316-320: Consider refactoring repetitive service configuration codeThe
Application.ConfigureServicesblock that removes and adds theIUserservice is repeated in multiple test methods (lines 316-320, 338-342, 368-372, and 399-403). To improve maintainability and reduce code duplication, consider refactoring this configuration into a shared setup method or utilizing test fixtures.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs (3)
Line range hint
253-361: Ensure correct configuration object is passed toAddMaskinportenHttpClientIn the
AddHttpClientsmethod, theAddMaskinportenHttpClientextension method is called withinfrastructureConfigurationSection, which is anIConfigurationSection. However,AddMaskinportenHttpClientexpects anIConfigurationobject. This mismatch could lead to runtime errors when attempting to retrieveInfrastructureSettings.Consider modifying the method signature to accept an
IConfigurationSectionor updating the parameter passed. Here’s a suggested fix:-private static IHttpClientBuilder AddMaskinportenHttpClient<TClient, TImplementation, TClientDefinition>( - this IServiceCollection services, - IConfiguration configuration, +private static IHttpClientBuilder AddMaskinportenHttpClient<TClient, TImplementation, TClientDefinition>( + this IServiceCollection services, + IConfigurationSection configurationSection, Action<TClientDefinition>? configureClientDefinition = null) { - var settings = configuration.Get<InfrastructureSettings>(); + var settings = configurationSection.Get<InfrastructureSettings>(); if (settings == null) { throw new InvalidOperationException("Failed to load InfrastructureSettings from configuration."); } services.RegisterMaskinportenClientDefinition<TClientDefinition>(typeof(TClient)!.FullName, settings.Maskinporten); // ... }Additionally, update the calls to
AddMaskinportenHttpClientinAddHttpClients:-services.AddMaskinportenHttpClient<ICloudEventBus, AltinnEventsClient, SettingsJwkClientDefinition>( +services.AddMaskinportenHttpClient<ICloudEventBus, AltinnEventsClient, SettingsJwkClientDefinition>( infrastructureConfigurationSection, x => x.ClientSettings.ExhangeToAltinnToken = true)
357-357: Avoid using null-forgiving operator unnecessarilyThe use of the null-forgiving operator (
!) ontypeof(TClient)!.FullNameis unnecessary sincetypeof(TClient)cannot be null. Additionally,FullNamecan benullonly for generic types or open types, which might not be the case here.Consider removing the null-forgiving operator:
-services.RegisterMaskinportenClientDefinition<TClientDefinition>(typeof(TClient)!.FullName, settings.Maskinporten); +services.RegisterMaskinportenClientDefinition<TClientDefinition>(typeof(TClient).FullName, settings.Maskinporten);
Line range hint
98-157: Consider configuring the FusionCache services conditionallyThe FusionCache services and configurations are added unconditionally. If certain caching strategies or backplane configurations are intended only for specific environments, consider adding conditional logic to apply these settings appropriately.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs (1)
1260-1263: Add 'CreatedAt' Property for TimestampsThe
SubjectResourceentity includesUpdatedAtbut lacks aCreatedAtproperty. Including both timestamps enhances auditability.Apply this diff to add the
CreatedAtproperty:+ b.Property<DateTimeOffset>("CreatedAt") + .ValueGeneratedOnAdd() + .HasColumnType("timestamp with time zone") + .HasDefaultValueSql("current_timestamp at time zone 'utc'");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (81)
- .azure/applications/web-api-so/main.bicep (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/ApplicationAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/ApplicationExtensions.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/Extensions/OptionExtensions/FluentValidationOptions.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/IIgnoreOnAssemblyScan.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Externals/IDialogDbContext.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/Common/Content/ContentValueDtoValidator.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/Outboxes/Commands/Delete/DeleteOutboxMessagesCommand.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/LocalDevelopmentSettings.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.ChangeDataCapture/ChangeDataCaptureAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.ChangeDataCapture/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.ChangeDataCapture.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Common/DomainEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Common/EventPublisher/IDomainEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Common/EventPublisher/IEventPublisher.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/Activities/DialogActivity.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DomainAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/MediaTypes.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Outboxes/OutboxMessage.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/Common/Extensions/AzureAppConfigurationExtensions.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/GraphQLAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/Program.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Common/Serialization/SerializerOptions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/DomainEvents/Outbox/Dispatcher/IdempotentDomainEventHandler.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/DomainEvents/Outbox/Dispatcher/OutboxDispatcher.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/DomainEvents/Outbox/Dispatcher/OutboxScheduler.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureBuilder.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureSettings.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Outboxes/OutboxMessageConfiguration.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Outboxes/OutboxMessageConsumerConfiguration.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Development/DevelopmentCleanupOutboxHostedService.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Development/DevelopmentMigratorHostedService.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Development/DevelopmentSubjectResourceSyncHostedService.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/DialogDbContext.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContext.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/IdempotentNotificationHandler.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/NotificationAcknowledgement.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Interceptors/ConvertDomainEventsToOutboxMessagesInterceptor.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Interceptors/PopulateActorNameInterceptor.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241007110904_AddMassTransitOutboxTables.Designer.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241007110904_AddMassTransitOutboxTables.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241011204951_AddNotificationAcknowledgementTable.Designer.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241011204951_AddNotificationAcknowledgementTable.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/JanitorAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/Program.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Consumers/DomainEventConsumer.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Consumers/OutboxMessages/OutboxMessageConsumer.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Consumers/OutboxMessages/OutboxMessageConsumerDefinition.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Program.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/ServiceAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Program.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/WebApiAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Library.Entity.Abstractions/LibraryEntityAbstractionsAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Library.Entity.EntityFrameworkCore/EntityLibraryEfCoreExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Library.Entity.EntityFrameworkCore/Features/EventPublisher/EventPublisherExtensions.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Library.Entity.EntityFrameworkCore/LibraryEntityFrameworkCoreAssemblyMarker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/AspNetUtilitiesExtensions.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/AzureAppConfigurationExtensions.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.GenerateFakeData/DialogGenerator.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.SlackNotifier/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.SlackNotifier.csproj (1 hunks)
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Common/DialogApplication.cs (4 hunks)
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Common/TestDomainEventConsumer.cs (1 hunks)
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/Common/Events/DomainEventsTests.cs (9 hunks)
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/CreateDialogTests.cs (4 hunks)
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Architecture.Tests/InfrastructureArchitectureTests.cs (1 hunks)
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Integration.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.Integration.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (13)
- .azure/applications/web-api-so/main.bicep
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Externals/IDialogDbContext.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/Outboxes/Commands/Delete/DeleteOutboxMessagesCommand.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/Common/Extensions/AzureAppConfigurationExtensions.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/DomainEvents/Outbox/Dispatcher/IdempotentDomainEventHandler.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/DomainEvents/Outbox/Dispatcher/OutboxDispatcher.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/DomainEvents/Outbox/Dispatcher/OutboxScheduler.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Outboxes/OutboxMessageConfiguration.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Outboxes/OutboxMessageConsumerConfiguration.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Consumers/OutboxMessages/OutboxMessageConsumer.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Consumers/OutboxMessages/OutboxMessageConsumerDefinition.cs
- src/Digdir.Library.Entity.EntityFrameworkCore/Features/EventPublisher/EventPublisherExtensions.cs
- src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/AspNetUtilitiesExtensions.cs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.ChangeDataCapture/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.ChangeDataCapture.csproj
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Common/EventPublisher/IDomainEvent.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Common/EventPublisher/IEventPublisher.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL.csproj
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.Integration.Tests.csproj
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (7)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/Activities/DialogActivity.cs (4)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1110 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20240910063003_AddDialogActivityDialogOpened.cs:13-16 Timestamp: 2024-09-16T06:47:29.219Z Learning: Ensure that changes to domain entities are accompanied by corresponding migrations.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1110 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20240910063003_AddDialogActivityDialogOpened.cs:13-16 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: Ensure that changes to domain entities are accompanied by corresponding migrations.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1110 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20240910063003_AddDialogActivityDialogOpened.cs:13-16 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: Do not consider style or maintainability issues in migration files generated by Entity Framework during code reviews.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1110 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20240910063003_AddDialogActivityDialogOpened.cs:13-16 Timestamp: 2024-09-16T06:47:29.219Z Learning: Do not consider style or maintainability issues in migration files generated by Entity Framework during code reviews.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Interceptors/ConvertDomainEventsToOutboxMessagesInterceptor.cs (2)
Learnt from: oskogstad PR: digdir/dialogporten#1187 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/DomainEvents/Outbox/ConvertDomainEventsToOutboxMessagesInterceptor.cs:105-122 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In the `ConvertDomainEventsToOutboxMessagesInterceptor` class, using a static in-memory cache (`UpdateEventThrottleCache`) for throttling in the `SendDialogUpdated` method is acceptable because only one instance of the WebAPI receives the REST request that generates these events. The throttling is meant to be local to prevent clients from receiving multiple notifications when both an update event and an activity created event are generated in the same transaction.Learnt from: oskogstad PR: digdir/dialogporten#1187 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/DomainEvents/Outbox/ConvertDomainEventsToOutboxMessagesInterceptor.cs:105-122 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T22:26:57.178Z Learning: In the `ConvertDomainEventsToOutboxMessagesInterceptor` class, using a static in-memory cache (`UpdateEventThrottleCache`) for throttling in the `SendDialogUpdated` method is acceptable because only one instance of the WebAPI receives the REST request that generates these events. The throttling is meant to be local to prevent clients from receiving multiple notifications when both an update event and an activity created event are generated in the same transaction.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json (2)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T11:25:25.336Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json (2)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T11:25:25.336Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json (2)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T11:25:25.336Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json (2)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T11:25:25.336Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/CreateDialogTests.cs (2)
Learnt from: oskogstad PR: digdir/dialogporten#1210 File: tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/CreateDialogTests.cs:282-282 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: Using square brackets `[]` for collection initialization is acceptable in the codebase's C# code.Learnt from: oskogstad PR: digdir/dialogporten#1210 File: tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/CreateDialogTests.cs:282-282 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T17:03:49.291Z Learning: Using square brackets `[]` for collection initialization is acceptable in the codebase's C# code.
🪛 Biome
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 19-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 19-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
🔇 Additional comments (106)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DomainAssemblyMarker.cs (1)
5-8: Consider the implications of changing fromstatictosealedclass.The class has been changed from
public statictopublic sealed. This change allows for potential instance members in the future while preventing inheritance. However, it's worth noting:
- If the class is intended to be used solely as a marker for the assembly (as the name suggests), the
staticmodifier might be more appropriate.- If there are plans to add instance members or if you want to allow instantiation while preventing inheritance, then
sealedis a good choice.Please confirm that this change aligns with the intended usage of the
DomainAssemblyMarkerclass.To ensure this change doesn't impact other parts of the codebase, let's verify its usage:
✅ Verification successful
<!-- [monologue] [task review_file_1/1] Review verification for `DomainAssemblyMarker.cs` after changing class from `static` to `sealed`. [observations] - Shell scripts executed found no instantiations (`new DomainAssemblyMarker`) or inheritance (`class X : DomainAssemblyMarker`). - Only static usage found: `DomainAssemblyMarker.Assembly` in two files. - The class is used solely for referencing its assembly. [analysis] - Changing from `static` to `sealed` does not introduce any new instantiation or inheritance points since none exist. - Static members are still appropriately accessed, and the primary use case as an assembly marker remains unaffected. - No adverse impacts detected from the change based on current usage. [actions] - Conclude that the change from `static` to `sealed` is safe and aligns with the current usage of the class. -->Verification Successful:
DomainAssemblyMarkerClass Signature ChangeNo instantiations or inheritance of
DomainAssemblyMarkerwere found. The static usages are consistent with its intended role as an assembly marker.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any instantiations or inheritance of DomainAssemblyMarker # Search for potential instantiations echo "Potential instantiations:" rg --type csharp "new DomainAssemblyMarker" # Search for potential inheritance echo "Potential inheritance:" rg --type csharp "class \w+ : DomainAssemblyMarker" # Search for static usage echo "Static usage:" rg --type csharp "DomainAssemblyMarker\."Length of output: 506
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/WebApiAssemblyMarker.cs (1)
5-8: Consider the implications of changing fromstatictosealedclass.The change from a
staticto asealedclass allows instantiation ofWebApiAssemblyMarkerwhile preventing inheritance. This modification might have the following impacts:
- Any code relying on this being a static class may need to be updated.
- It opens up possibilities for adding instance members in the future if needed.
Please ensure that:
- This change is intentional and aligns with the design goals.
- All usages of this class throughout the codebase have been reviewed and updated if necessary.
- The team is aware of this change, as it might affect how they interact with this class in the future.
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script to find all usages of
WebApiAssemblyMarker:This will help identify any places where the code might need to be updated due to the class change.
✅ Verification successful
Change from
statictosealedclass is safe and does not impact current usages.No issues were found with this modification.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of WebApiAssemblyMarker rg --type csharp -A 5 "WebApiAssemblyMarker"Length of output: 980
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/GraphQLAssemblyMarker.cs (1)
5-5: Consider the implications of changing fromstatictosealedclass.The modification from a
staticto asealedclass allows instantiation while still preventing inheritance. This change might be part of a larger architectural shift, possibly related to dependency injection or testing. However, it's important to consider the following:
- Existing code that used this class statically might need updates to instantiate it.
- The change could affect how the assembly is referenced in other parts of the codebase.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following verification script:
The
Assemblyfield remains static and readonly, which is appropriate for its purpose of providing a single reference point to the assembly.✅ Verification successful
The change from
statictosealedclass has been verified and does not introduce any issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for static references to GraphQLAssemblyMarker that might need updating rg --type csharp "GraphQLAssemblyMarker\." -C 3Length of output: 895
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/JanitorAssemblyMarker.cs (1)
5-8: Verify usage ofJanitorAssemblyMarkerthroughout the codebaseThe change from
statictosealedforJanitorAssemblyMarkercould have broader implications. To ensure this modification doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please verify:
- Any dependency injection configurations using this class.
- Assembly scanning mechanisms that might rely on this class.
- Any code that explicitly checked for or prevented instantiation of this class.
To assist with this verification, you can run the following script to find all usages of
JanitorAssemblyMarker:This will help identify areas that might need adjustment due to the class type change.
✅ Verification successful
Continue verifying
JanitorAssemblyMarkerusage with additional searchesTo ensure all possible dependency injection configurations involving
JanitorAssemblyMarkerare identified, please run the following script:This script broadens the search to include common DI methods such as
Add,Register,Configure, andUse, helping to identify any additional configurations that might affect the change fromstatictosealedforJanitorAssemblyMarker.
Continue verifying
JanitorAssemblyMarkerusage with corrected shell scriptsPlease run the following script to comprehensively search for dependency injection configurations involving
JanitorAssemblyMarker:
Verified: No impact from changing
JanitorAssemblyMarkertosealedThe modification from
statictosealedforJanitorAssemblyMarkerdoes not affect dependency injection configurations or broader codebase functionality. The class is primarily used for assembly referencing in tests, which remains unchanged.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of JanitorAssemblyMarker in the codebase # Search for JanitorAssemblyMarker usages echo "Searching for JanitorAssemblyMarker usages:" rg --type csharp -n "JanitorAssemblyMarker" # Search for potential DI configurations echo -e "\nSearching for potential DI configurations:" rg --type csharp -n "services\.Add|builder\.Register" | rg "JanitorAssemblyMarker"Length of output: 706
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for DI configurations using JanitorAssemblyMarker # Search for JanitorAssemblyMarker within various DI patterns echo "Searching for comprehensive DI configurations involving JanitorAssemblyMarker:" rg --type csharp -n "JanitorAssemblyMarker" | rg "Add|Register|Configure|Use"Length of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for DI configurations using JanitorAssemblyMarker # Search for JanitorAssemblyMarker within various DI patterns echo "Searching for comprehensive DI configurations involving JanitorAssemblyMarker:" rg --type csharp "JanitorAssemblyMarker" | rg "Add|Register|Configure|Use"Length of output: 340
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/ServiceAssemblyMarker.cs (1)
5-8: Consider the implications of changing fromstatictosealedclassThe class has been changed from
public statictopublic sealed. While this change doesn't affect the current functionality, it has some implications:
- The class can now be instantiated, which wasn't possible before.
- It still cannot be inherited from, maintaining encapsulation.
- It allows for potential instance members in the future, providing more flexibility.
Ensure that this change aligns with the intended usage of the
ServiceAssemblyMarkerclass in the broader context of the application. If the class is solely used for its staticAssemblyfield, consider keeping it as astaticclass to prevent unnecessary instantiation.To ensure this change doesn't impact the usage of this class elsewhere in the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Change from
statictosealedVerifiedThe transition of
ServiceAssemblyMarkerfrom astaticto asealedclass does not impact the current functionality:
- No instances of
ServiceAssemblyMarkerare created.- The
Assemblyfield usage remains consistent and unaffected.This change introduces flexibility for potential future expansions without disrupting existing code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any instantiations or inheritance of ServiceAssemblyMarker # Test 1: Check for any instantiations of ServiceAssemblyMarker echo "Checking for instantiations of ServiceAssemblyMarker:" rg --type csharp "new ServiceAssemblyMarker\(\)" # Test 2: Check for any classes inheriting from ServiceAssemblyMarker echo "Checking for classes inheriting from ServiceAssemblyMarker:" rg --type csharp "class \w+ : ServiceAssemblyMarker" # Test 3: Check for usage of ServiceAssemblyMarker.Assembly echo "Checking for usage of ServiceAssemblyMarker.Assembly:" rg --type csharp "ServiceAssemblyMarker\.Assembly"Length of output: 639
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/ApplicationAssemblyMarker.cs (1)
5-5: Consider the implications of changing fromstatictosealedThe class has been changed from
statictosealed, which alters its behavior:
- A
staticclass cannot be instantiated or inherited.- A
sealedclass can be instantiated but cannot be inherited.This change allows instantiation of the class, which wasn't possible before. However, it's worth noting:
- The
Assemblyfield remainsstatic, so it's still accessible without instantiation.- The name "Marker" typically implies usage for assembly scanning or similar purposes, which often doesn't require instantiation.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following script to check for any direct usage of this class:
If there are no direct instantiations or inheritance of this class, consider keeping it
staticfor clarity of intent.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Issues Found
The change from
statictosealedfor theApplicationAssemblyMarkerclass does not impact the current usage within the codebase. The staticAssemblyfield remains accessible as before, and there are no instances or inheritance that would be affected by this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of ApplicationAssemblyMarker rg --type csharp "ApplicationAssemblyMarker" -C 3Length of output: 1526
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureAssemblyMarker.cs (1)
5-8: Consider the implications of changing fromstatictosealedclass.The modification from a
staticto asealedclass allows instantiation ofInfrastructureAssemblyMarker. While this maintains the inability to inherit from the class, it introduces the following considerations:
- Any existing code that uses this class statically may need to be updated.
- The ability to create instances of this class might lead to unnecessary object creation, as the class seems to serve mainly as a holder for the
Assemblyproperty.- The rationale behind this change is not immediately clear from the context provided.
To assess the impact of this change, please run the following script:
Could you please clarify the reasoning behind this change? If there's no specific need for instantiation, consider keeping it as a
staticclass to maintain its original design intent.✅ Verification successful
Change from
statictosealedclass does not affect existing usages.The search results indicate that there are no instantiations of
InfrastructureAssemblyMarkerin the codebase. All existing usages are static accesses to theAssemblyproperty found in the following files:
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Architecture.Tests/InfrastructureArchitectureTests.cstests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Architecture.Tests/DialogportenAssemblies.cssrc/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureBuilder.cssrc/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.csTherefore, changing the class to
sealeddoes not introduce any breaking changes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for static usages of InfrastructureAssemblyMarker that might need updating # Test: Search for static usages of InfrastructureAssemblyMarker echo "Searching for static usages of InfrastructureAssemblyMarker:" rg --type csharp "InfrastructureAssemblyMarker\." -C 3 # Test: Search for any direct instantiations of InfrastructureAssemblyMarker echo "Searching for instantiations of InfrastructureAssemblyMarker:" rg --type csharp "new InfrastructureAssemblyMarker" -C 3Length of output: 4284
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/IIgnoreOnAssemblyScan.cs (1)
1-6: Well-implemented marker interfaceThe implementation of
IIgnoreOnAssemblyScanfollows best practices for marker interfaces:
- Clear and descriptive naming
- Appropriate XML documentation
- Correct use of an empty interface
This marker interface will be useful for excluding specific classes from assembly scanning processes, which is a common requirement in dependency injection and reflection-based systems.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Common/DomainEvent.cs (1)
2-2: Namespace change approved. Verify consistency across the codebase.The change in the import statement from
Digdir.Library.Entity.Abstractions.Features.EventPublishertoDigdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.Common.EventPublisheris approved. This change aligns with a more domain-centric architecture.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any files that might still be using the old namespace and confirm the usage of the new namespace across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Namespace change verified successfully.
The import statement change from
Digdir.Library.Entity.Abstractions.Features.EventPublishertoDigdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.Common.EventPublisherhas been successfully verified across the codebase. No remaining references to the old namespace were found, ensuring consistency and alignment with the domain-centric architecture.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old namespace and identify files that might need updating. # Search for the old namespace echo "Files still using the old namespace:" rg "Digdir\.Library\.Entity\.Abstractions\.Features\.EventPublisher" --type cs # Search for the new namespace to confirm its usage echo "Files using the new namespace:" rg "Digdir\.Domain\.Dialogporten\.Domain\.Common\.EventPublisher" --type csLength of output: 2354
src/Digdir.Library.Entity.EntityFrameworkCore/LibraryEntityFrameworkCoreAssemblyMarker.cs (1)
8-8: Approved, but please clarify the rationale for this change.The modification from a
staticclass to asealedclass is syntactically correct. However, this change allows the class to be instantiated, which wasn't possible before. Could you please elaborate on the reasons for this change? It would be helpful to understand how this fits into the larger context of adding a masstransit outbox system.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, let's verify if there are any existing usages of this class as a static class in the codebase:
This script will help us identify any potential areas that might need updating due to this change.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
The change from a
staticclass to asealedclass forLibraryEntityFrameworkCoreAssemblyMarkerdoes not impact existing static member usages. All references toLibraryEntityFrameworkCoreAssemblyMarker.Assemblyremain valid, and no instantiations of the class were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for static usages of LibraryEntityFrameworkCoreAssemblyMarker # Test: Search for static usages of the class echo "Searching for static usages of LibraryEntityFrameworkCoreAssemblyMarker:" rg --type csharp "LibraryEntityFrameworkCoreAssemblyMarker\." -C 2 # Test: Search for any direct instantiation of the class (which wasn't possible before) echo "Searching for instantiations of LibraryEntityFrameworkCoreAssemblyMarker:" rg --type csharp "new LibraryEntityFrameworkCoreAssemblyMarker\(" -C 2Length of output: 1007
src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet.csproj (1)
9-12: Approved: Azure package additions look good, but clarification needed.The addition of
Azure.IdentityandMicrosoft.Azure.AppConfiguration.AspNetCorepackages is appropriate for integrating Azure services into the project. These will enhance the application's capabilities for identity management and configuration in Azure environments.However, could you please clarify how these Azure-related changes tie into the masstransit outbox system mentioned in the PR title? It would be helpful to understand the broader context of these modifications.
To ensure these package additions don't conflict with existing dependencies, let's run the following check:
✅ Verification successful
Approved: Azure package additions validated and no conflicts found.
The addition of
Azure.IdentityandMicrosoft.Azure.AppConfiguration.AspNetCorepackages has been confirmed to be appropriate and free from version conflicts within the project. These packages will enhance the application's Azure integration capabilities.However, could you please clarify how these Azure-related changes tie into the masstransit outbox system mentioned in the PR title?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential package conflicts or inconsistencies # Test: Search for other Azure-related packages and their versions rg --type xml 'PackageReference.*Azure' src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet.csprojLength of output: 278
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Common/TestDomainEventConsumer.cs (3)
1-3: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The import statements are concise and relevant to the class implementation. They cover the necessary dependencies for domain events, MassTransit consumer, and MediatR publisher.
5-5: LGTM: Namespace declaration is correct.The namespace
Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests.Commonaccurately reflects the file's location in the project structure and its purpose as a common component for integration tests.
1-18: Overall assessment: Well-implemented test consumer for domain events.The
TestDomainEventConsumer<T>class is a well-structured and effective implementation for consuming domain events in integration tests. It correctly integrates with MassTransit and follows good practices such as:
- Proper use of generics with constraints
- Null checking in the constructor
- Concise implementation of the
ConsumemethodThe only suggestion for improvement is to add XML documentation to enhance code readability and maintainability.
Great job on this implementation!
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service.csproj (1)
12-12: New project reference addedA new project reference to
Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNethas been added. This suggests that the project now depends on utility functions or classes from this library, potentially for ASP.NET-related functionality.To ensure this change is consistent with the project's architecture and doesn't introduce circular dependencies, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Project Reference Verified Successfully
The new project reference to
Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNethas been verified. The referenced project exists, and no circular dependencies were detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new project reference and check for potential circular dependencies # Test 1: Verify the existence of the referenced project fd -e csproj -p src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet # Test 2: Check for potential circular dependencies rg -l "Include=\".*Digdir\.Domain\.Dialogporten\.Service\.csproj\"" src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNetLength of output: 216
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/MediaTypes.cs (1)
1-1: LGTM: New using directive is appropriate.The addition of the
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.Common.EventPublisher;directive is appropriate as it's likely needed for theIDomainEventinterface used in the newly addedGetDomainEventTypes()method.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Outboxes/OutboxMessage.cs (1)
2-2: LGTM! Verify new EventPublisher implementation.The change from an external library to an internal domain-specific import for
EventPublisheraligns well with the PR objectives. This move towards domain-specific event publishing can provide better control and customization.To ensure a smooth transition, please verify that the new
EventPublisherimplementation inDigdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.Common.EventPublisherprovides all the necessary functionality that was previously available in the external library. Run the following script to compare the implementations:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: New EventPublisher Implemented Correctly
The new
IEventPublisherimplementation inDigdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.Common.EventPublisheris properly integrated and replaces the previous external library. No remaining references to the oldEventPublisherwere found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare the new EventPublisher implementation with the old one # Search for the old EventPublisher implementation echo "Old EventPublisher implementation:" rg --type csharp -A 10 "namespace.*Features.EventPublisher" # Search for the new EventPublisher implementation echo "New EventPublisher implementation:" rg --type csharp -A 10 "namespace.*Common.EventPublisher" # Compare method signatures echo "Comparing method signatures:" rg --type csharp "public.*EventPublisher" | sort | uniqLength of output: 3163
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/NotificationAcknowledgement.cs (2)
7-12: LGTM: Well-structuredNotificationAcknowledgementclass.The
NotificationAcknowledgementclass is well-designed:
- It's correctly marked as
internalandsealed.- The use of
requiredproperties ensures proper initialization.- The immutable design (using
init) is appropriate for this type of entity.
1-23: Excellent implementation of notification acknowledgement system.This file introduces a well-designed system for handling notification acknowledgements:
- The
NotificationAcknowledgementclass is a clean, immutable representation of the entity.- The
NotificationAcknowledgementConfigurationclass properly configures the entity for database storage.- The implementation follows Entity Framework Core best practices and good design principles.
The code is of high quality and should integrate well with the rest of the system.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Development/DevelopmentMigratorHostedService.cs (2)
Line range hint
7-31: LGTM: Well-implemented development migration serviceThe implementation of
DevelopmentMigratorHostedServiceis well-structured and follows good practices:
- It's correctly marked as
internal sealed.- The constructor properly checks for null arguments.
- The
StartAsyncmethod appropriately checks the environment before performing the migration.- The
StopAsyncmethod correctly returns a completed task.The class serves its purpose well for the development environment, which aligns perfectly with its new namespace.
5-5: Approve namespace change and verify referencesThe namespace change from
Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.PersistencetoDigdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.Persistence.Developmentis a good improvement in code organization. It better reflects the development-specific nature of this class.To ensure this change doesn't break any existing code, please run the following script to check for any references to this class using the old namespace:
If any results are found, please update those references to use the new namespace.
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Architecture.Tests/InfrastructureArchitectureTests.cs (1)
Line range hint
13-18: Verify the status of OutboxScheduler classThe AI summary mentions that
nameof(OutboxScheduler)was removed from thepublicByDesignClassesarray, but this change is not visible in the provided code snippet. This implies thatOutboxSchedulershould now be internal.Please run the following script to verify the status of the
OutboxSchedulerclass:If
OutboxSchedulerno longer exists or has been made internal, no further action is needed. Otherwise, please update its visibility to internal to align with the architecture test.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Development/DevelopmentSubjectResourceSyncHostedService.cs (1)
6-6: Namespace change approved and aligns with best practices.The change in namespace to
Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.Persistence.Developmentis appropriate and aligns with best practices for organizing development-specific components. This change improves code organization and makes it clear that this service is intended for development environments only.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/LocalDevelopmentSettings.cs (1)
18-18: Verify the impact of the new property on dependent code.The addition of
UseInMemoryServiceBusTransportsuggests a new feature for toggling between in-memory and actual service bus transport in local development. This change may require updates in other parts of the codebase.Please ensure the following:
- Update any code that interacts with the service bus to check this property and behave accordingly.
- Modify relevant unit tests or integration tests to account for this new configuration option.
- Update documentation to reflect this new local development setting.
To help verify the impact, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify areas of the code that might need to be updated to accommodate the new property.
✅ Verification successful
The addition of
UseInMemoryServiceBusTransportis properly implemented and localized to service bus configuration within development environments.
- The property is used in
InfrastructureExtensions.csto toggle between in-memory and Azure Service Bus transports.- No additional changes are required in other parts of the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for potential usage of service bus or transport-related code # Test: Look for service bus or transport-related terms echo "Searching for potential service bus or transport-related code:" rg --type csharp -i "servicebus|transport|masstransit" -g "!**/LocalDevelopmentSettings.cs" # Test: Look for configuration loading related to LocalDevelopmentSettings echo "Searching for configuration loading of LocalDevelopmentSettings:" rg --type csharp "GetLocalDevelopmentSettings|LocalDevelopmentSettings"Length of output: 16190
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of the UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport property echo "Searching for usages of UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport:" rg --type csharp "UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport" -g "!**/LocalDevelopmentSettings.cs"Length of output: 605
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract code blocks where UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport is used echo "Extracting code around UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport usage in InfrastructureExtensions.cs:" # Extract lines surrounding the usage for context (e.g., 5 lines before and after) rg --type csharp "UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport" --context 5 src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.csLength of output: 1172
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Integration.Tests.csproj (1)
16-16: LGTM: Package version update approved.The update of
Verify.Xunitfrom version 27.0.0 to 27.0.1 is a minor version bump, which typically indicates bug fixes or small improvements. This change is consistent with good practices for maintaining up-to-date dependencies in test projects.However, this change seems unrelated to the PR's main objective of adding a masstransit outbox system. Let's verify if there are any other changes related to the outbox system in this project:
If the script doesn't return any results, it might be worth clarifying with the PR author why this package update is included in this PR and if it should be in a separate maintenance PR instead.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Package version update related to MassTransit Outbox system.
The update of
Verify.Xunitto version27.0.1supports the integration and testing of the MassTransit Outbox system, aligning with the PR's objectives. This change is confirmed to be relevant and necessary for the ongoing enhancements.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for outbox-related changes in the test project # Test: Search for outbox-related terms in the test project rg --type csharp -i 'outbox|masstransit' tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Integration.TestsLength of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for outbox-related changes in the main codebase # Test: Search for outbox-related terms in the main project rg --type csharp -i 'outbox|masstransit' src/Length of output: 63692
src/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.SlackNotifier/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.SlackNotifier.csproj (1)
9-9: Approved: Azure.Identity package update looks good.The update of Azure.Identity from version 1.12.1 to 1.13.0 is a minor version bump, which typically indicates new features or non-breaking changes. This update is likely beneficial for security and performance improvements.
To ensure this update doesn't introduce any issues, please:
- Review the Azure.Identity changelog for any breaking changes or important updates.
- Verify compatibility with other Azure SDK packages used in the project.
- Run all relevant tests to ensure functionality remains intact.
- Consider updating other Azure SDK packages to maintain version consistency across the project.
You can use the following script to check for other Azure SDK package references that might need updating:
This will help identify if there are other Azure SDK packages that might benefit from updates to maintain consistency.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.csproj (1)
10-10: Verify the necessity and impact of the Azure.Identity package update.The Azure.Identity package has been updated from version 1.12.1 to 1.13.0. While keeping dependencies up-to-date is generally good practice, it's important to consider the following:
- Ensure that this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes that could affect the project.
- Verify that this update aligns with the project's overall dependency management strategy.
- Check if this update addresses any specific issues or provides new features that are relevant to the project.
To ensure this update doesn't cause any unforeseen issues, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential compatibility issues and provide context for the update decision.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241011204951_AddNotificationAcknowledgementTable.cs (3)
1-10: LGTM: File structure and class declaration are correct.The migration file follows the standard Entity Framework Core structure. The namespace is appropriate, and the class correctly inherits from
Migration.
33-38: LGTM:Downmethod correctly reverts the migration.The
Downmethod appropriately drops theNotificationAcknowledgementtable, effectively reverting the changes made in theUpmethod.
1-40: Overall, excellent migration implementation with minor improvement suggestions.This migration file is well-structured, follows Entity Framework Core best practices, and correctly implements both
UpandDownmethods. TheNotificationAcknowledgementtable is properly defined with appropriate columns, constraints, and indexing.The suggestions provided earlier for potential improvements are minor and optional. Great job on this migration implementation!
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Common/Serialization/SerializerOptions.cs (1)
4-4: LGTM. Verify the impact of the EventPublisher change across the project.The change from
Digdir.Library.Entity.Abstractions.Features.EventPublishertoDigdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.Common.EventPublisherlooks good. This shift to a domain-specific implementation aligns with domain-driven design principles.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please run the following script to check for any other usages of the old import across the project:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: EventPublisher import change is consistent across the project.
The replacement of
Digdir.Library.Entity.Abstractions.Features.EventPublisherwithDigdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.Common.EventPublisherhas been successfully verified throughout the codebase. No references to the old import remain, ensuring consistency and adherence to domain-driven design principles.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of the old EventPublisher import # Test: Search for the old import. Expect: No results. rg --type csharp "using Digdir\.Library\.Entity\.Abstractions\.Features\.EventPublisher;" # Test: Search for usages of EventPublisher to ensure they're using the new import. Expect: All results should use the new import. rg --type csharp "EventPublisher"Length of output: 2868
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json (1)
2-25: Infrastructure configuration looks good.The Infrastructure section is well-structured with appropriate placeholders for sensitive information. The use of "TODO: Add to local secrets" is intentional and aligns with the project's practices, as documented in
docs/Configuration.md.Key points:
- Redis and DialogDbConnectionString placeholders are correctly set.
- Maskinporten configuration includes all necessary fields for the production environment.
- Altinn configuration provides the required URIs and subscription key placeholder.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 15-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 19-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 19-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json (2)
3-6: LGTM: Placeholder usage for sensitive information is correct.The use of "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders for the Redis connection string and DialogDbConnectionString is intentional and follows the project's configuration management strategy. This approach ensures that missing configurations fail fast and loud, which is a good practice. These placeholders will be overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms in the actual deployment environment.
24-28: LGTM: Altinn configuration is appropriate for staging. Verify URIs.The Altinn configuration looks good for a staging environment:
- The BaseUri and EventsBaseUri point to the "tt02" test environment, which is appropriate for staging.
- The SubscriptionKey correctly uses a placeholder for sensitive information.
To ensure the configuration is up-to-date, it's advisable to verify that these are the correct and most current URIs for the Altinn test environment.
To verify the Altinn URIs, you can run the following command:
This will help identify where Altinn URIs are used in the codebase, allowing you to cross-reference with the configuration and ensure consistency.
✅ Verification successful
: Altinn URIs in the staging configuration are correctly referenced in the codebase. No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for Altinn URI usage across the codebase # Expected result: A list of files and lines where Altinn URIs are used rg --type csharp -i "altinn.*uri"Length of output: 905
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json (2)
30-46: LGTM: Application configuration includes key rotation mechanism.The Application section is well-structured with a base URI and Ed25519 key pairs. The inclusion of primary and secondary key pairs suggests a good practice for key rotation.
A couple of points to consider:
- Ensure that the base URI "https://altinn-dev-api.azure-api.net/dialogporten" is correct for the test environment.
- Implement a process for regularly rotating the Ed25519 key pairs to maintain security best practices.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the Dialogporten base URI in the codebase # Test: Search for the usage of the Dialogporten base URI echo "Searching for usage of Dialogporten base URI:" rg "altinn-dev-api.azure-api.net/dialogporten" --type cs
2-28: LGTM: Infrastructure configuration structure is well-organized.The Infrastructure section is well-structured and follows the project's convention for sensitive information placeholders. The use of "TODO: Add to local secrets" ensures that missing configurations fail fast and loud, which is good practice.
Verify Maskinporten scopes.
The Maskinporten configuration includes multiple scopes. Please ensure that all these scopes are necessary for the test environment and that they align with the minimal required permissions principle.
Consider using Key Vault reference for webhook sink URL.
For the Altinn EventsBaseUri, consider using a Key Vault reference instead of hardcoding "Secret webhook sink URL in source key vault". This approach would be more consistent with how other sensitive information is handled.
✅ Verification successful
Maskinporten scopes are correctly configured in all relevant configuration files.
All specified Maskinporten scopes are present in the
appsettings.*.jsonfiles across different projects and environments, ensuring they are appropriately configured for each context.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of Maskinporten scopes in the codebase # Test: Search for the usage of each scope echo "Searching for usage of Maskinporten scopes:" scopes=("altinn:events.publish" "altinn:events.publish.admin" "altinn:register/partylookup.admin" "altinn:authorization/authorize.admin" "altinn:accessmanagement/authorizedparties.admin") for scope in "${scopes[@]}"; do echo "Searching for: $scope" rg "$scope" --type cs doneLength of output: 252
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of Maskinporten scopes in the codebase # Test: Search for the usage of each scope echo "Searching for usage of Maskinporten scopes:" scopes=("altinn:events.publish" "altinn:events.publish.admin" "altinn:register/partylookup.admin" "altinn:authorization/authorize.admin" "altinn:accessmanagement/authorizedparties.admin") for scope in "${scopes[@]}"; do echo "Searching for: $scope" rg "$scope" --type cs doneLength of output: 1213
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive verification of Maskinporten scopes usage in the codebase echo "Searching for usage of Maskinporten scopes across all file types:" scopes=("altinn:events.publish" "altinn:events.publish.admin" "altinn:register/partylookup.admin" "altinn:authorization/authorize.admin" "altinn:accessmanagement/authorizedparties.admin") for scope in "${scopes[@]}"; do echo "Searching for: $scope" rg "$scope" doneLength of output: 21227
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/Activities/DialogActivity.cs (3)
Line range hint
1-50: Consider potential database impacts and migrationsWhile there are no visible structural changes to the
DialogActivityentity in this file, it's important to consider the broader impact of the changes in the event publishing mechanism:
- Verify if any related entities or configurations have been affected by the shift to the new event publishing mechanism.
- Consider if any changes in event handling might indirectly affect the database schema or data persistence.
- If any impacts are identified, ensure that appropriate database migrations are created and applied.
To check for any related changes that might require migrations, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for related changes that might require migrations # Test 1: Look for any changes in related entity files echo "Checking for changes in related entity files:" git diff --name-only main -- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities # Test 2: Check for any new migration files echo "Checking for new migration files:" git diff --name-only main -- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations # Test 3: Look for any changes in database context or configuration files echo "Checking for changes in database context or configuration files:" git diff --name-only main -- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/PersistenceIf any relevant changes are detected, please ensure that appropriate migrations are created and applied.
Line range hint
13-50: Verify compatibility with the new event publishing mechanismThe
DialogActivityclass implementation looks good and seems to be working with the new event publishing mechanism. TheOnCreatemethod correctly creates aDialogActivityCreatedDomainEventand adds it to the_domainEventslist.However, to ensure full compatibility:
- Verify that the
IEventPublisherinterface from the new namespace is compatible with the existing implementation.- Confirm that all necessary event types (e.g.,
DialogActivityCreatedDomainEvent) are available in the new namespace.- Check if any additional configuration or setup is required for the new event publishing mechanism.
To verify the compatibility and usage of the new event publishing mechanism, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new event publishing mechanism # Test 1: Check the definition of IEventPublisher interface echo "Checking IEventPublisher interface:" rg --type csharp "interface IEventPublisher" src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Common/EventPublisher # Test 2: Check the definition of DialogActivityCreatedDomainEvent echo "Checking DialogActivityCreatedDomainEvent:" rg --type csharp "class DialogActivityCreatedDomainEvent" src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Events/Activities # Test 3: Check for any additional setup or configuration for the new event publishing mechanism echo "Checking for additional setup or configuration:" rg --type csharp "EventPublisher" src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain
2-2: Verify the removal of the old event publisher importThe addition of
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.Common.EventPublisher;suggests a shift from an external library to an internal implementation for event publishing. This change may affect how events are handled throughout the class.However, the removal of
using Digdir.Library.Entity.Abstractions.Features.EventPublisher;mentioned in the AI summary is not visible in the provided code. Please ensure that this import has been removed to avoid potential conflicts or unused imports.To confirm the removal of the old import and check for any remaining usages, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Old event publisher import successfully removed
The old
using Digdir.Library.Entity.Abstractions.Features.EventPublisher;has been successfully removed fromDialogActivity.cs, and there are no remaining usages of the old namespace in the file or the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of old event publisher import and check for any remaining usages # Test 1: Check if the old import still exists echo "Checking for old import:" rg --type csharp "using Digdir\.Library\.Entity\.Abstractions\.Features\.EventPublisher;" src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/Activities/DialogActivity.cs # Test 2: Check for any remaining usages of types from the old namespace echo "Checking for remaining usages:" rg --type csharp "Digdir\.Library\.Entity\.Abstractions\.Features\.EventPublisher\." src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/Activities/DialogActivity.csLength of output: 2156
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json (2)
2-30: LGTM! Configuration structure looks good.The "Infrastructure" section is well-structured with appropriate placeholders for sensitive information. The use of "TODO: Add to local secrets" is intentional and aligns with the project's configuration management approach, as documented in
docs/Configuration.md. These placeholders ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud, which is a good practice for development environments.Make sure to add the actual values to your local secrets or Azure app configuration as appropriate.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
50-62: LGTM! Comprehensive local development configuration.The "LocalDevelopment" section provides excellent granular control over various components and features for the development environment. This allows developers to easily toggle different aspects of the system for testing and debugging purposes.
However, be cautious of the following settings that significantly alter the behavior compared to production:
DisableAuth: TrueDisableCache: TrueUseInMemoryServiceBusTransport: TrueWhile these are useful for development, ensure that your testing process includes scenarios with these features enabled to catch any potential issues that might only appear in a production-like environment.
To ensure these development settings don't unintentionally affect production, let's verify that they are not present in the production configuration:
src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/AzureAppConfigurationExtensions.cs (3)
1-1: LGTM: Using directives and namespace update.The added using directives and the namespace change are appropriate for the class's functionality and reflect the code reorganization mentioned in the summary.
Also applies to: 4-5, 7-7, 9-9
43-45: LGTM: Streamlined Key Vault configuration.The refactoring of the Key Vault configuration into a single expression improves code readability without changing the functionality. This is a good improvement.
15-15: Verify implications of changing class visibility to public.The change from
internaltopublicforAzureAppConfigurationExtensionsis noted. This allows the class to be accessed from outside its original assembly, which appears intentional based on the PR summary.Please ensure that:
- This change aligns with the intended API surface for the library.
- Proper documentation is in place for public consumption.
- You've considered any versioning implications of exposing this class publicly.
Run the following script to check for any other usages of this class that might be affected:
✅ Verification successful
Class visibility change to public confirmed.
No unintended usages of
AzureAppConfigurationExtensionsdetected outside intended contexts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of AzureAppConfigurationExtensions rg --type csharp "AzureAppConfigurationExtensions" -C 3Length of output: 1963
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Interceptors/PopulateActorNameInterceptor.cs (2)
9-9: Approve namespace changeThe namespace change from
Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.Persistence.Configurations.ActorstoDigdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.Persistence.Interceptorsis a good improvement. It better reflects the purpose of thePopulateActorNameInterceptorclass and improves code organization.
Line range hint
1-95: Overall assessment of PopulateActorNameInterceptorThe
PopulateActorNameInterceptorclass is well-implemented and serves its purpose of populating actor names during database save operations. The namespace change improves code organization. However, there are opportunities for improvement in error handling, special case management, and overall method structure.Consider implementing the suggested refactorings to enhance readability and maintainability. These changes will make the code more robust and easier to understand for future developers working on this class.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/ApplicationExtensions.cs (2)
12-12: LGTM: New import statement added.The addition of
using MediatR.NotificationPublishers;is appropriate and necessary for the subsequent changes in the MediatR configuration.
Line range hint
1-94: Overall assessment: Changes look good and align with PR objectives.The modifications to this file enhance the MediatR configuration, which is in line with the PR's goal of adding a masstransit outbox system. The changes contribute to a more refined event handling process and seem to be part of a larger architectural shift.
Key improvements:
- More granular control over type registration with MediatR.
- Potential performance improvement in notification handling.
These changes lay a good foundation for the new outbox system. As the PR progresses, ensure that these modifications integrate well with other components of the masstransit outbox system being implemented.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/Program.cs (1)
77-78: Approve the addition of.WithPubCapabilities()and suggest improvements.The addition of
.WithPubCapabilities()seems appropriate in the service configuration chain. It aligns with the PR objective of adding a masstransit outbox system.Please verify the following:
- The
WithPubCapabilities()method is properly implemented in the infrastructure layer.- Any necessary configuration for this new capability is correctly set up.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of
WithPubCapabilities()for better code readability. For example:// Add publishing capabilities for the masstransit outbox system .WithPubCapabilities()To verify the implementation, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified the addition of
.WithPubCapabilities()in the service configuration.The
WithPubCapabilities()method is properly implemented and integrated within the infrastructure layers across theWebApiandGraphQLprojects. The configuration aligns with the PR objective of adding the MassTransit outbox system.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of WithPubCapabilities method # Test: Search for the WithPubCapabilities method definition echo "Searching for WithPubCapabilities method definition:" rg --type csharp -A 5 "WithPubCapabilities" # Test: Search for any related configuration echo "Searching for related configuration:" rg --type csharp -A 5 "PubCapabilities|OutboxSystem"Length of output: 6734
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs (1)
Line range hint
18-26: Verify the implementation ofIEventPublisherinterface.The
DialogEntityclass now implements theIEventPublisherinterface. However, there are no new methods added specifically for this interface. Please verify that:
- The
IEventPublisherinterface is correctly implemented, possibly through the existingPopDomainEventsmethod.- No additional methods are required to fully implement the interface.
To assist in this verification, please run the following script to check the definition of
IEventPublisher:If the script reveals that additional methods are required, please update the
DialogEntityclass accordingly.src/Digdir.Library.Entity.EntityFrameworkCore/EntityLibraryEfCoreExtensions.cs (2)
81-81: Verify the impact of removing event publisher.The removal of
.AddEventPublisher()from the method chain is consistent with the overall changes described in the PR summary. This modification aligns with the shift away from event publishing functionality.
- Please verify that this change doesn't negatively impact any systems or components that may have relied on the event publisher.
- Consider updating the method's documentation to reflect the removal of event publishing functionality.
To ensure no unintended side effects, please run the following verification script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to AddEventPublisher and related event publishing functionality # Test: Search for any remaining calls to AddEventPublisher rg --type csharp 'AddEventPublisher' # Test: Check for any remaining event publishing related code that might need to be removed rg --type csharp 'EventPublisher|PublishEvent' # Test: Look for any configuration related to event publishing that might need to be updated rg --type json '"EventPublisher"|"PublishEvent"'
Line range hint
36-37: Verify the impact of commented-out entity handling.The changes to comment out
.HandleVersionableEntities()and.HandleUpdatableEntities(utcNow)have been noted. This modification aligns with the removal of event publishing functionality mentioned in the PR summary.
- Please verify that this change doesn't negatively impact the system's ability to handle entity versioning and updates.
- Consider updating the method's documentation to reflect these changes, as the current comments still mention handling versionable and updatable entities.
To ensure no unintended side effects, please run the following verification script:
src/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.GenerateFakeData/DialogGenerator.cs (2)
12-12: LGTM: New using statement addedThe addition of
using Digdir.Library.Entity.Abstractions.Features.Identifiable;is appropriate for the upcoming changes in ID generation.
96-96: LGTM: Improved ID generation logicThe change from
idtoid ?? IdentifiableExtensions.CreateVersion7()enhances the ID generation process for dialog commands. This ensures that every command will have a valid ID, defaulting to a UUID version 7 if none is provided. This approach offers benefits such as sortability and guaranteed uniqueness.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241011204951_AddNotificationAcknowledgementTable.Designer.cs (1)
14-15: LGTM! Migration is correctly added to the DialogDbContext.The new migration "20241011204951_AddNotificationAcknowledgementTable" is properly integrated into the
DialogDbContext. The naming convention for the migration follows best practices by including a timestamp, which helps maintain order in the migration history.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/IdempotentNotificationHandler.cs (3)
18-22: Constructor implementation is correctThe constructor correctly initializes the dependencies and guards against
nullvalues using argument null checks. This ensures that the class is instantiated with valid parameters.
34-35: Proper acknowledgment after successful handlingAcknowledging the handler after successfully processing the notification is a good practice. This ensures that the notification won't be processed again unnecessarily.
9-12:⚠️ Potential issueFix syntax error: Move comment outside interface list
Placing comments between interface declarations in a class declaration may cause syntax errors in C#. The comment between
INotificationHandler<TNotification>andIIgnoreOnAssemblyScanshould be moved above the class declaration or below the interface list to maintain proper syntax.Apply this diff to correct the issue:
-internal sealed class IdempotentNotificationHandler<TNotification> : - INotificationHandler<TNotification>, - // We need to manually register this NotificationHandler because - // it should decorate all INotificationHandler<TNotification> - // instances, not be a notification handler in of itself. - IIgnoreOnAssemblyScan +// We need to manually register this NotificationHandler because +// it should decorate all INotificationHandler<TNotification> +// instances, not be a notification handler in of itself. +internal sealed class IdempotentNotificationHandler<TNotification> : + INotificationHandler<TNotification>, + IIgnoreOnAssemblyScanLikely invalid or redundant comment.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Development/DevelopmentCleanupOutboxHostedService.cs (1)
43-44: Confirm the simplicity of StopAsync implementationThe
StopAsyncmethod correctly returns a completed task, as there are no resources to dispose or actions required when the service stops.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs (1)
28-33:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure Thread-Safety When Initializing Contexts
While
ConcurrentDictionaryensures thread-safe additions, there might be race conditions during the initialization of a newNotificationProcessingContext. Multiple threads could attempt to initialize the same context simultaneously.Consider adding synchronization within the initialization block or ensuring that
Initializeis thread-safe.You can run the following script to check for thread-safety in
NotificationProcessingContext:✅ Verification successful
Thread-Safety in NotificationProcessingContext Confirmed
The initialization of
NotificationProcessingContextis protected by aSemaphoreSlim, ensuring thread-safe operations.
- File:
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContext.cs🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify thread-safety in NotificationProcessingContext initialization # Search for synchronization primitives in NotificationProcessingContext rg --type cs 'class NotificationProcessingContext' -A 50 | rg 'lock|Monitor|Semaphore|Mutex|volatile|Interlocked'Length of output: 295
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Consumers/DomainEventConsumer.cs (2)
33-53: Verify the registration and lifetime of generic consumer definitionsEnsure that
DomainEventConsumerDefinition<T>is registered correctly in the dependency injection container, and that the generic typeTis handled appropriately. Misconfigurations might lead to runtime errors or the consumer not functioning as intended.To confirm, you can run the following script to inspect the registration of consumer definitions:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the registration of DomainEventConsumerDefinition<T> in the DI container. # Test: Search for registration code. Expect: Proper registration of the consumer definition. rg --type cs 'services\.AddMassTransit' -A 15
29-30: Verify the logic inIsFirstAttemptmethodThe
IsFirstAttemptmethod checks if the sum ofGetRetryAttempt()andGetRedeliveryCount()equals zero. Verify that this logic correctly determines the first attempt in all scenarios, considering how MassTransit handles retries and redeliveries. Incorrect calculations might lead to improper handling of message processing contexts.To ensure correctness, run the following script to examine the usage of
GetRetryAttemptandGetRedeliveryCountin similar contexts:✅ Verification successful
Verified: The
IsFirstAttemptmethod correctly determines the first attempt by ensuring the sum ofGetRetryAttempt()andGetRedeliveryCount()equals zero. No inconsistent usage patterns were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of GetRetryAttempt and GetRedeliveryCount to verify their behavior. # Test: Find all occurrences where these methods are used. Expect: Consistent usage patterns. rg --type cs 'GetRetryAttempt\(\)|GetRedeliveryCount\(\)' -A 5Length of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of GetRetryAttempt and GetRedeliveryCount to verify their behavior. # Test: Find all occurrences where these methods are used. Expect: Consistent usage patterns. rg --type cs 'GetRetryAttempt\(\)|GetRedeliveryCount\(\)' -A 5Length of output: 709
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/Extensions/OptionExtensions/FluentValidationOptions.cs (2)
1-2: Approved: Addition of 'using System.Reflection;'The addition of
using System.Reflection;is necessary for utilizing reflection in the new constructor.
10-10: Approved: Addition of 'OptionType' fieldThe introduction of
private static readonly Type OptionTypeimproves code readability and performance by caching the type ofTOptions.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Program.cs (2)
86-87: Review middleware ordering for Azure configurationThe
UseAzureConfiguration()middleware is added afterUseHttpsRedirection(). Middleware ordering is crucial in ASP.NET Core applications. Verify thatUseAzureConfiguration()is placed appropriately in the middleware pipeline and does not need to be earlier to correctly set up the configuration before other middleware runs.
51-53:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the order of configuration sources
The
AddAzureConfigurationis added beforeAddLocalConfiguration. Typically, configuration sources added last will override previous ones when keys conflict. Ensure that local settings should indeed override Azure settings. If the intention is the opposite, consider swapping the order.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Interceptors/ConvertDomainEventsToOutboxMessagesInterceptor.cs (2)
18-18: Use ofLazy<IPublishEndpoint>for dependency injectionThe use of
Lazy<IPublishEndpoint>for injecting the publish endpoint is appropriate and helps to prevent potential circular dependency issues with the DI container.
43-43: Properly awaitingbase.SavingChangesAsyncAdding
awaitto the callbase.SavingChangesAsyncensures that the asynchronous operation is correctly awaited, preventing potential issues with incomplete database operations.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContext.cs (1)
54-59:Nackmethod may not persist changes if not called appropriatelyIn the
Nackmethod, changes are saved only if_acknowledgedisfalseand_db.ChangeTracker.HasChanges()returnstrue. If there are untracked changes or if_acknowledgedhas been inadvertently set, important data might not be saved.Ensure that
_acknowledgedis managed correctly and consider whether additional conditions or logging are necessary to guarantee that all relevant changes are persisted.Run the following script to verify if there are any untracked changes that might be missed:
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureBuilder.cs (3)
93-94: Validate the usage ofFluentValidationOptionsYou are using
FluentValidationOptions<InfrastructureSettings>and callingValidate(null, settings);. Ensure that this usage aligns with the intended API. Passingnullas the first argument might not be appropriate.Please verify that the validator is being used correctly. If necessary, adjust the method call to match the expected parameters of the
Validatemethod.
12-18: Default implementation in interfaces requires C# 8 or higherThe default implementation provided in the
IPubSubInfrastructureChoiceinterface requires C# 8.0 or higher. Ensure that your project is targeting the correct language version.Please confirm that the project supports default interface methods.
30-34:⚠️ Potential issueInvalid class constructor syntax
The class
InfrastructureBuilderis using an invalid syntax for defining constructor parameters. In C#, only records can have positional parameters like this. Classes should define constructors within the class body.Here's how you can fix the class declaration and constructor:
-internal sealed class InfrastructureBuilder(IServiceCollection services, IConfiguration configuration, IHostEnvironment environment) : +internal sealed class InfrastructureBuilder : IInfrastructureBuilder, IPubSubInfrastructureChoice, ISubscriptionInfrastructureOptions { + public InfrastructureBuilder(IServiceCollection services, IConfiguration configuration, IHostEnvironment environment) + { + _services = services ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services)); + _configuration = configuration ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(configuration)); + _environment = environment ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(environment)); + }Also, update the field declarations accordingly:
-private readonly IServiceCollection _services = services ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services)); -private readonly IConfiguration _configuration = configuration ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(configuration)); -private readonly IHostEnvironment _environment = environment ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(environment)); +private readonly IServiceCollection _services; +private readonly IConfiguration _configuration; +private readonly IHostEnvironment _environment;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/DialogDbContext.cs (2)
19-22: Usings added for MassTransit integration look goodThe added using directives are appropriate for integrating MassTransit and handling idempotent notifications.
50-50: Addition ofNotificationAcknowledgementsDbSet is appropriateThe new
DbSetforNotificationAcknowledgementshas been correctly added to the context.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Program.cs (2)
84-85: Addition of.WithPubCapabilities()is appropriateThe inclusion of
.WithPubCapabilities()enhances the infrastructure with publishing capabilities. The placement before.Build()is correct.
141-141:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the predicate logic for
DisableAuthThe predicate
localDevelopmentSettings.DisableAuthis used to conditionally replaceITokenIssuerCachewithDevelopmentTokenIssuerCache. Please verify if this aligns with the intended behavior. Disabling authentication might not necessarily require replacing the token issuer cache, and doing so could have unintended effects.Run the following script to review the usage and predicates related to
ITokenIssuerCache:✅ Verification successful
Verification Confirmed:
DisableAuthPredicate Logic Aligns with Intended BehaviorThe replacement of
ITokenIssuerCachewithDevelopmentTokenIssuerCachewhenlocalDevelopmentSettings.DisableAuthis enabled is correctly implemented. This ensures that authentication mechanisms are appropriately bypassed during development without introducing unintended side effects.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check where `ITokenIssuerCache` is replaced and the predicates used. # Search for all instances of ReplaceSingleton for ITokenIssuerCache rg --type cs $'ReplaceSingleton<ITokenIssuerCache, DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache>' # Examine the predicates used in these replacements rg --type cs -A 2 $'ReplaceSingleton<ITokenIssuerCache, DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache>'Length of output: 594
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all replacements of ITokenIssuerCache and their predicates. # Search for all instances of ReplaceSingleton for ITokenIssuerCache and capture predicates rg --type cs 'ReplaceSingleton<ITokenIssuerCache, DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache>' --context 2 # Additionally, search for the definition and usage of DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache fd DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache --type cs | xargs catLength of output: 856
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all definitions and usages of DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache in .cs files. # Search for all instances of DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache in .cs files fd DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache --extension cs | xargs catLength of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache and related ITokenIssuerCache implementations. # Search for all instances of DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache in .cs files using ripgrep rg 'DevelopmentTokenIssuerCache' --type cs # Additionally, search for all definitions and implementations of ITokenIssuerCache rg 'interface\s+ITokenIssuerCache' --type cs rg 'class\s+\w+\s*:\s*ITokenIssuerCache' --type csLength of output: 1098
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241007110904_AddMassTransitOutboxTables.cs (5)
15-19: Ensure data backup or migration before dropping tablesThe migration drops existing tables
OutboxMessageConsumerandOutboxMessage. Before applying this migration, please ensure that any essential data in these tables is backed up or migrated appropriately to prevent data loss.
21-42: Review uniqueness constraints forMassTransitInboxStateThe table
MassTransitInboxStatehas a unique constraint on the combination ofMessageIdandConsumerId. Ensure that this constraint aligns with the application's logic and that it won't inadvertently prevent valid records from being inserted.
45-74: Confirm nullable fields and data types inMassTransitOutboxMessageSeveral columns in
MassTransitOutboxMessageare marked as nullable (e.g.,EnqueueTimeis nullable whileSentTimeis not). Verify that the nullability and data types of these fields match the requirements of MassTransit and your application's messaging patterns.
126-169: Ensure theDownmethod correctly restores previous stateThe
Downmethod recreates theOutboxMessageandOutboxMessageConsumertables. Confirm that the recreated tables, including column definitions and constraints, match the original schema to allow a proper rollback if needed.
1-171: Overall migration reviewThe migration script appropriately transitions from the old outbox implementation to the new MassTransit outbox tables, aligning with the architectural changes described. Aside from the concerns noted, the changes appear well-structured and comprehensive.
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/Common/Events/DomainEventsTests.cs (3)
39-39: Consistent use of MassTransit test harness enhances testsThe addition of the MassTransit test harness with
await Application.ConfigureServicesWithMassTransitTestHarness();in your test methods improves the reliability of event consumption assertions. This ensures that your tests are accurately validating that the expected domain events are consumed after the commands are sent.Also applies to: 87-87, 128-128, 176-176, 206-206
57-62: Ensure proper event consumption assertionsThe use of
harness.Consumed.SelectAsync<...>()combined with appropriate conditions and awaiting the results correctly verifies that the domain events are consumed as expected. This is a good practice to confirm that your application is publishing events correctly.Also applies to: 111-112, 160-161, 190-191, 220-221
43-46: Correct implementation of dialog activities generationThe creation and configuration of dialog activities, including the selection of the
transmissionOpenedActivity, are handled correctly. This ensures that activities are properly associated with the transmission and dialog.tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Common/DialogApplication.cs (8)
8-8: Inclusion of Domain NamespaceThe addition of
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain;ensures access to domain entities and extensions used within the file. This is appropriate for interacting with domain models.
13-13: Addition of Persistence Interceptors NamespaceIncluding
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.Persistence.Interceptors;is necessary for utilizing interceptors likeConvertDomainEventsToOutboxMessagesInterceptorin the service collection configuration.
17-18: Adding MassTransit Namespaces for Messaging SupportThe inclusion of
using MassTransit;andusing MassTransit.Testing;indicates the integration of MassTransit for messaging and testing purposes. Ensure that MassTransit components are correctly configured and utilized within the file.
23-23: Utilization of Dependency Injection ExtensionsAdding
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Extensions;allows the use of extension methods likeRemoveAll<T>()on theIServiceCollection, facilitating service registration modifications.
78-78: Exception Message Reflects Updated Method NameThe exception message now references the updated method name using
nameof(ConfigureServices), ensuring consistency and maintainability if the method name changes in the future.
93-110: Introducing 'ConfigureServicesWithMassTransitTestHarness' Method for Enhanced TestingThe new method
ConfigureServicesWithMassTransitTestHarnesssets up the MassTransit test harness, enhancing testing capabilities for messaging components.
Removal of Existing
IPublishEndpointRegistrations: The call tox.RemoveAll<IPublishEndpoint>()ensures that previous registrations do not conflict with the test harness.Dynamic Consumer Registration: Registering consumers for all domain event types allows comprehensive testing of event handling.
Lifecycle Management: Ensure that the
ITestHarnessis properly started and disposed to prevent resource leaks.Consider implementing proper disposal of the
ITestHarnessafter tests:// Example of disposing the harness await harness.Stop();Ensure integration with the test framework's teardown mechanisms to manage resources effectively.
121-121: Deferred Resolution ofIPublishEndpointwith Lazy InitializationRegistering
Lazy<IPublishEndpoint>defers the creation of theIPublishEndpointuntil it's needed, which can improve performance by avoiding unnecessary initializations.Confirm that lazy initialization aligns with the application's dependency resolution logic and does not introduce latency in message publishing when the endpoint is first accessed.
74-74: Method Renaming from 'ConfigureServiceCollection' to 'ConfigureServices'Renaming the method to
ConfigureServicesaligns with common conventions. Ensure that all references to the old method nameConfigureServiceCollectionwithin the codebase are updated to prevent any inconsistencies or runtime errors.Run the following script to identify any outdated references:
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/CreateDialogTests.cs (4)
Line range hint
338-342: Repeated service configuration codeThis code segment duplicates the service configuration code discussed earlier (lines 316-320). Please refer to the previous comment regarding refactoring suggestions.
Line range hint
368-372: Repeated service configuration codeThis code segment duplicates the service configuration code discussed earlier (lines 316-320). Please refer to the previous comment regarding refactoring suggestions.
Line range hint
399-403: Repeated service configuration codeThis code segment duplicates the service configuration code discussed earlier (lines 316-320). Please refer to the previous comment regarding refactoring suggestions.
Line range hint
316-320: Ensure consistent use ofConfigureServicesmethodThe method
Application.ConfigureServicesis used here, replacing the previousConfigureServiceCollection. Please verify that all occurrences ofApplication.ConfigureServiceCollectionhave been updated toConfigureServicesthroughout the codebase to maintain consistency.Run the following script to identify any remaining usages of
ConfigureServiceCollection:src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs (2)
159-162: Review the placement of the environment checkThe
if (!environment.IsDevelopment())check is currently placed after the configuration of FusionCache settings. Ensure that any development-specific configurations are appropriately wrapped within this check to prevent unexpected behavior in production environments.
96-96: Verify the decorator registration forINotificationHandler<>Decorating all
INotificationHandler<>implementations withIdempotentNotificationHandler<>can have wide-ranging effects. Ensure that this decorator is intended for all notifications and does not unintentionally affect handlers that should not be idempotent.Run the following script to list all
INotificationHandler<>implementations and review them:src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs (4)
1287-1290: Ensure Accurate Timezone Handling for 'AcknowledgedAt'The
AcknowledgedAtproperty usescurrent_timestamp at time zone 'utc'. Verify that this aligns with your application's timezone handling to prevent discrepancies in timestamp data.
1299-1346: MassTransit 'InboxState' Entity ConfigurationThe
InboxStateentity appears correctly set up for MassTransit integration. Ensure that all nullable fields are intentional and that default values are handled appropriately.
1348-1437: MassTransit 'OutboxMessage' Entity ConfigurationThe
OutboxMessageentity is well-defined for supporting the outbox pattern. Confirm that all required properties are included and that indexing supports expected query patterns.
1272-1273: Verify Unique Constraint on 'Resource' and 'Subject'The unique index on
ResourceandSubjectensures that each combination is unique. Confirm that this constraint aligns with the domain requirements and won't cause issues with legitimate duplicate entries.To check for potential duplicates in existing data, run:
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241007110904_AddMassTransitOutboxTables.Designer.cs (4)
28-2098: Entities Configuration Appears CorrectThe entities and their configurations, including properties, relationships, and constraints, are properly defined. The use of
HasKey,HasIndex, and data annotations align with Entity Framework Core best practices. The default values and constraints are appropriately set.
1278-1446: MassTransit Outbox and Inbox Tables ConfigurationThe configurations for
MassTransitInboxState,MassTransitOutboxMessage, andMassTransitOutboxStateare correctly defined to support MassTransit outbox and inbox functionalities. The properties and indexes should facilitate efficient message tracking and retrieval.
2103-2103: Ensure Proper Mapping Strategy UsageThe call to
UseTphMappingStrategy();sets the inheritance mapping strategy to Table-per-Hierarchy. Confirm that this mapping strategy aligns with your domain requirements and that it is consistently used across the entities that inherit from base classes.To check where
UseTphMappingStrategy()is used in your codebase:# Find all occurrences of UseTphMappingStrategy in the codebase rg "UseTphMappingStrategy\(\);" --type cs
23-24: Verify the Maximum Identifier Length AnnotationThe annotation
.HasAnnotation("Relational:MaxIdentifierLength", 63);sets the maximum identifier length to 63 characters. Ensure that this length is appropriate for your database provider. For PostgreSQL, the maximum identifier length is typically 63 characters, so this is correct. If you plan to use a different provider, adjust accordingly.To confirm that the database provider supports this identifier length, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
Maximum Identifier Length Annotation Verified
The
.HasAnnotation("Relational:MaxIdentifierLength", 63);correctly sets the maximum identifier length for PostgreSQL, which supports up to 63 characters.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
# Verify the maximum identifier length for the configured database provider. # Expected: PostgreSQL with a maximum identifier length of 63. grep -R "UseNpgsql" src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Length of output: 8878
src/Digdir.Library.Entity.Abstractions/LibraryEntityAbstractionsAssemblyMarker.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
....Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241007110904_AddMassTransitOutboxTables.Designer.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DomainExtensions.cs (2)
5-6: Consider renaming the class or using extension methods.The class name
DomainExtensionssuggests it contains extension methods, but the current implementation doesn't use thethiskeyword in its method parameter. Consider either:
- Renaming the class to better reflect its utility nature (e.g.,
DomainEventTypeUtility).- If applicable, refactor the method to be an actual extension method.
7-11: LGTM: Effective implementation, consider adding error handling.The
GetDomainEventTypes()method effectively retrieves domain event types using LINQ, making the code concise and readable. The filtering criteria are appropriate for excluding abstract classes, interfaces, and generic types while ensuring returned types are assignable toIDomainEvent.Consider adding error handling to manage potential exceptions that might occur during reflection. For example:
public static IEnumerable<Type> GetDomainEventTypes() { try { return DomainAssemblyMarker.Assembly .GetTypes() .Where(x => !x.IsAbstract && !x.IsInterface && !x.IsGenericType) .Where(x => x.IsAssignableTo(typeof(IDomainEvent))); } catch (ReflectionTypeLoadException ex) { // Log the error and return an empty collection or rethrow as needed // Example: _logger.LogError(ex, "Error loading types from assembly"); return Enumerable.Empty<Type>(); } }This addition would make the method more robust against potential issues during type loading.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DomainExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContext.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContext.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DomainExtensions.cs (1)
1-3: LGTM: Namespace and using statement are correctly defined.The namespace hierarchy and using statement are appropriate for the domain-driven design approach. The file structure follows good practices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Program.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-88: Consider measuring startup time impact.The file has undergone significant restructuring with the addition of new capabilities like Azure configuration and manual domain event consumer registration. While these changes align with the PR objectives, they might affect the application's startup performance. Consider measuring and comparing the startup time before and after these changes to ensure there's no significant negative impact.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Program.cs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/Program.cs (5)
8-9: LGTM: New using directives are appropriate.The added using directives are relevant to the changes implemented in the file, particularly for domain event handling and Azure configuration.
Also applies to: 11-13
86-87: LGTM: HTTPS redirection and Azure configuration usage.The addition of HTTPS redirection is a good security practice. However, please verify that the middleware order is correct, as it can affect the application's behavior.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for middleware order documentation or comments # Test: Search for middleware-related comments or documentation echo "Searching for middleware-related comments or documentation:" rg --type cs -i "middleware|pipeline" -g "*.cs" -C 3 | grep -i "//\|/\*\|TODO"
51-53: Verify the configuration order.The addition of Azure configuration before local configuration might affect how configuration values are resolved. Ensure this order aligns with your intended configuration priority.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any configuration-related comments or documentation # Test: Search for configuration-related comments echo "Searching for configuration-related comments:" rg --type cs -i "configuration|config" -g "*.cs" -C 3 | grep -i "//\|/\*\|TODO" # Test: Check for configuration documentation echo "Checking for configuration documentation:" fd -e md -e txt | xargs rg -i "configuration|config"
82-82: Please clarify the health check changes.The switch from
AddHealthCheckstoAddAspNetHealthChecksand the introduction ofMapAspNetHealthCheckssuggest a move to a more specific health check implementation. Could you provide more context on the benefits or additional capabilities this change introduces?Also applies to: 85-85
✅ Verification successful
Health check registration has been customized to include specific health checks. No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for documentation or usage of AspNetHealthChecks # Test: Search for AspNetHealthChecks in the codebase echo "Searching for AspNetHealthChecks usage and documentation:" rg --type cs -i "AspNetHealthChecks" -C 3Length of output: 1230
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition and usage of AddAspNetHealthChecks echo "Searching for the definition of AddAspNetHealthChecks:" rg --type cs "AddAspNetHealthChecks" -A 5 -B 5 echo "Searching for all usages of AddAspNetHealthChecks in the codebase:" rg --type cs "AddAspNetHealthChecks" --context 3Length of output: 6890
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of AddAspNetHealthChecks echo "Extracting the implementation of AddAspNetHealthChecks from AspNetUtilitiesExtensions.cs:" rg --type cs "public static IServiceCollection AddAspNetHealthChecks" -A 20 -B 0 src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/AspNetUtilitiesExtensions.csLength of output: 1197
55-66: LGTM: Manual registration of domain event consumers.The new approach for registering domain event consumers provides more flexibility. However, ensure that proper exception handling is in place for potential issues during the dynamic creation of generic types, as mentioned in a previous review comment.
Also applies to: 72-80
...in.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/Common/Events/DomainEventsTests.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs (1)
31-47: Consider adding more detailed exception handlingThe
CreateContextmethod is generally well-implemented, but there's room for improvement in exception handling:
- The current implementation catches all exceptions and rethrows them after removing the context. Consider catching specific exceptions that you expect might occur during initialization.
- Log the exception before rethrowing to provide more context for debugging.
Consider updating the exception handling as follows:
try { await transaction.Initialize(isFirstAttempt, cancellationToken); return transaction; } catch (Exception ex) { _logger.LogError(ex, "Failed to initialize notification processing context for event {EventId}", domainEvent.EventId); RemoveContext(domainEvent.EventId); throw; }src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs (5)
25-26: Significant changes to infrastructure setup and dependenciesThe addition of MassTransit and MediatR dependencies, along with the change in the
AddInfrastructuremethod signature, suggests a shift towards a more modular and event-driven architecture. This change allows for better separation of concerns and potentially improved scalability.However, ensure that all team members are familiar with these new patterns and libraries to maintain code quality and consistency across the project.
Also applies to: 33-35, 41-45
Line range hint
47-170: Consider refactoringAddInfrastructure_Internalfor improved maintainabilityThe
AddInfrastructure_Internalmethod centralizes the infrastructure setup, which is good for consistency. However, its length and complexity might make it harder to understand and modify. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused methods for each major configuration area (e.g., database, caching, health checks).Key points to note:
- The method uses interceptors for the DbContext, which is a good practice for cross-cutting concerns.
- Caching configurations are quite detailed, which is good for performance but might need documentation for future maintenance.
- The development-specific section at the end is a good practice for separating concerns.
Consider extracting the caching configuration into a separate method to improve readability:
private static void ConfigureCaching(IServiceCollection services, InfrastructureSettings infrastructureSettings) { services.AddFusionCacheNeueccMessagePackSerializer(); services.AddStackExchangeRedisCache(opt => opt.Configuration = infrastructureSettings.Redis.ConnectionString); services.AddFusionCacheStackExchangeRedisBackplane(opt => opt.Configuration = infrastructureSettings.Redis.ConnectionString); // ... (rest of the caching configuration) }Then call this method from
AddInfrastructure_Internal.
Line range hint
253-360: Approve changes toAddHttpClientswith a minor suggestionThe changes to the
AddHttpClientsmethod improve type safety and readability by directly usingInfrastructureSettingsinstead ofIConfiguration. This is a good improvement that reduces the risk of configuration errors.Consider adding XML documentation to the
AddHttpClientsmethod to explain its purpose and the types of clients it adds. This will help future developers understand the method's role in the infrastructure setup:/// <summary> /// Adds and configures HTTP clients for various external services used in the application. /// </summary> /// <param name="services">The <see cref="IServiceCollection"/> to add the clients to.</param> /// <param name="infrastructureSettings">The infrastructure settings containing configuration for the clients.</param> /// <returns>The <see cref="IServiceCollection"/> so that additional calls can be chained.</returns> private static IServiceCollection AddHttpClients(this IServiceCollection services, InfrastructureSettings infrastructureSettings) { // Existing implementation... }
362-376: EnhanceFusionCacheSettingswith XML documentationThe introduction of the
FusionCacheSettingsclass is a good approach to encapsulate cache configuration. To improve maintainability and make it easier for other developers to use this class correctly, consider adding XML documentation.Add XML documentation to the class and its properties. Here's an example for a few properties:
/// <summary> /// Encapsulates settings for configuring FusionCache behavior. /// </summary> private sealed class FusionCacheSettings { /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the default duration for which items will be cached. /// </summary> public TimeSpan Duration { get; set; } = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1); /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the maximum duration for which a failed cache item will be considered valid in fail-safe scenarios. /// </summary> public TimeSpan FailSafeMaxDuration { get; set; } = TimeSpan.FromHours(2); /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the duration for which subsequent requests will be throttled after a fail-safe scenario occurs. /// </summary> public TimeSpan FailSafeThrottleDuration { get; set; } = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30); // Add similar documentation for other properties... }This documentation will help developers understand the purpose and impact of each setting when configuring the cache.
Line range hint
1-377: Overall architecture improvements with increased complexityThe changes in this file represent a significant shift towards a more scalable and maintainable architecture. Key improvements include:
- Introduction of MassTransit for robust message-based communication.
- Use of the outbox pattern for improved reliability in distributed systems.
- More flexible and configurable caching setup with FusionCache.
- Improved separation of concerns in infrastructure setup.
While these changes bring many benefits, they also increase the overall complexity of the system. To ensure the team can effectively work with and maintain this new architecture:
- Consider creating high-level documentation explaining the new architecture and the rationale behind the changes.
- Organize knowledge-sharing sessions or workshops to bring the team up to speed on new concepts (e.g., MassTransit, outbox pattern).
- Review and update any existing documentation or diagrams to reflect the new architecture.
As the system evolves, continue to monitor the balance between flexibility and complexity. Regular refactoring sessions may be beneficial to keep the codebase maintainable as new requirements emerge.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/Extensions/OptionExtensions/FluentValidationOptions.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureBuilder.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs (5 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureSettings.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContext.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/IdempotentNotificationHandler.cs (1 hunks)
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/Common/Events/DomainEventsTests.cs (9 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureSettings.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/IdempotentNotificationHandler.cs
- tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/Common/Events/DomainEventsTests.cs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContext.cs (2)
Learnt from: MagnusSandgren PR: digdir/dialogporten#1277 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs:7-11 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T09:49:19.855Z Learning: In the `digdir/dialogporten` project (C# codebase using .NET), the `INotificationProcessingContextFactory` interface defined in `src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs` must remain `public` because it is used by the Service layer. Therefore, its visibility cannot be changed to `internal`.Learnt from: MagnusSandgren PR: digdir/dialogporten#1277 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/IdempotentNotificationHandler.cs:27-27 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T07:06:56.484Z Learning: In the `IdempotentNotificationHandler<TNotification>` class within the `digdir/dialogporten` project (C# codebase using .NET), the `INotificationProcessingContextFactory.GetExistingContext` method will never return `null`; it will either return a context or throw an exception if no context is found.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs (2)
Learnt from: MagnusSandgren PR: digdir/dialogporten#1277 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/IdempotentNotificationHandler.cs:27-27 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T07:06:56.484Z Learning: In the `IdempotentNotificationHandler<TNotification>` class within the `digdir/dialogporten` project (C# codebase using .NET), the `INotificationProcessingContextFactory.GetExistingContext` method will never return `null`; it will either return a context or throw an exception if no context is found.Learnt from: MagnusSandgren PR: digdir/dialogporten#1277 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs:7-11 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T09:49:19.855Z Learning: In the `digdir/dialogporten` project (C# codebase using .NET), the `INotificationProcessingContextFactory` interface defined in `src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs` must remain `public` because it is used by the Service layer. Therefore, its visibility cannot be changed to `internal`.
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/Extensions/OptionExtensions/FluentValidationOptions.cs (3)
11-11: LGTM: Efficient type cachingThe addition of the
OptionTypestatic field is a good optimization. It caches thetypeof(TOptions)result, which can improve performance, especially if the type is accessed frequently.
21-31: Improve XML documentation formattingThe XML documentation provides clear information about the constructor's purpose and behavior. However, the use of
<b>tags is not standard in XML documentation and may not render correctly in all documentation tools.Consider applying the following change to improve documentation compatibility:
- /// It includes both public and internal validators in the search. <b>Use this constructor sparingly - /// as it uses reflection to find validators.</b> + /// It includes both public and internal validators in the search. + /// <remarks> + /// Use this constructor sparingly as it uses reflection to find validators. + /// </remarks>
Line range hint
1-40: LGTM: Well-structured and flexible implementationThe overall structure of the
FluentValidationOptions<TOptions>class is well-designed and now offers increased flexibility:
- The new constructor allows for automatic discovery of validators through assembly scanning, which can be very useful in larger projects.
- The existing constructor is maintained, ensuring backward compatibility and allowing for manual specification of validators when needed.
- The
Validatemethod remains unchanged, preserving the core functionality of the class.This implementation provides a good balance between convenience (automatic validator discovery) and control (manual validator specification), making the class more versatile without breaking existing usage.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContextFactory.cs (6)
10-14: LGTM: Well-designed interfaceThe
INotificationProcessingContextFactoryinterface is well-designed and follows C# naming conventions. The method signatures are clear and provide the necessary functionality for creating and retrieving notification processing contexts. The public visibility is appropriate as it's used by the Service layer.
16-22: LGTM: Well-structured class with appropriate fieldsThe
NotificationProcessingContextFactoryclass is well-structured with appropriate fields:
- Using
ConcurrentDictionaryensures thread-safety for storing contexts.- The
WeakReferenceusage helps with memory management.- The
PeriodicTimerfor cleanup is a good approach to prevent memory leaks.- Dependency injection is used for
IServiceScopeFactoryandILogger.
24-29: LGTM: Constructor with proper initializationThe constructor is well-implemented:
- It properly checks for null dependencies.
- The cleanup task is started using
Task.Run, which is appropriate for long-running background tasks.
49-55: LGTM: GetExistingContext method implementationThe
GetExistingContextmethod is well-implemented:
- It correctly uses the
TryGetValuemethod ofConcurrentDictionary.- The
TryGetLiveContextmethod is used to ensure the context is still alive.- An appropriate exception is thrown when the context is not found.
This implementation aligns with the learning that this method will never return null.
57-62: LGTM: Proper resource cleanup in Dispose methodThe
Disposemethod correctly cleans up resources:
- It cancels the cleanup task.
- It disposes of the
CancellationTokenSourceandPeriodicTimer.
64-75: LGTM: Well-implemented private helper methodsThe private helper methods are well-implemented:
GetOrAddContextusesConcurrentDictionary.AddOrUpdateeffectively.RemoveContextis a simple wrapper aroundConcurrentDictionary.TryRemove.ContextHousekeepingimplements a robust cleanup mechanism.TryGetLiveContextefficiently checks if a context is alive and not disposed.The implementation shows good attention to thread-safety and resource management.
Also applies to: 77-109
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureBuilder.cs (1)
38-39:⚠️ Potential issueCorrect list initialization syntax
The initialization of
_actionsand_busConfigurationsuses[], which is not valid C# syntax for initializing lists. In C#, lists should be initialized usingnew()ornew List<T>().Apply this diff to fix the list initialization:
-private readonly List<Action<InfrastructureBuilderContext>> _actions = []; -private readonly List<Action<IBusRegistrationConfigurator>> _busConfigurations = []; +private readonly List<Action<InfrastructureBuilderContext>> _actions = new(); +private readonly List<Action<IBusRegistrationConfigurator>> _busConfigurations = new();Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/IdempotentNotifications/INotificationProcessingContext.cs (4)
8-14: Visibility ofINotificationProcessingContextInterface is AppropriateThe
INotificationProcessingContextinterface is correctly declared aspublic, ensuring it can be accessed by the Service layer and other external components that depend on it, as per the project's requirements.
16-145: Implementation ofNotificationProcessingContextis SolidThe
NotificationProcessingContextclass provides a robust implementation of theINotificationProcessingContextinterface. It correctly manages asynchronous operations, resource disposal, and concurrency control usingSemaphoreSlim. The use ofEnsureAlive()with[MemberNotNull]ensures that necessary components are initialized before use.
87-107: Proper Disposal Pattern inDisposeAsyncMethodThe
DisposeAsyncmethod appropriately handles resource cleanup and ensures that any unsaved changes are handled via theNackmethod. Exception handling within the disposal process is well-implemented to log any errors without disrupting the disposal flow.
109-134: Concurrency Control inInitializeMethodThe
Initializemethod correctly uses aSemaphoreSlimto manage concurrent access and ensures that resources are initialized only once. The use of atry...finallyblock guarantees that the semaphore is released even if an exception occurs, preventing potential deadlocks.
...omain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/Extensions/OptionExtensions/FluentValidationOptions.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureBuilder.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json (4)
12-23: LGTM! Consider clarifying the comment about client definition types.The Maskinporten section is well-structured and includes the necessary configurations for the production environment. The scopes listed are consistent with the required Altinn platform scopes.
Consider updating the comment on line 20 to provide more context about the "client definition types" mentioned. This could help future developers understand the configuration better. For example:
- // Any additional settings are specific for the selected client definition type. + // Any additional settings below are specific to the selected client definition type (e.g., certificate-based, token-exchange).🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
24-28: LGTM! Consider optimizing duplicate URIs.The Altinn section is correctly configured for the production environment with appropriate URIs and a placeholder for the SubscriptionKey.
I noticed that both
BaseUriandEventsBaseUrihave the same value. If these are always intended to be the same, consider consolidating them into a single configuration to reduce redundancy and potential inconsistencies:"Altinn": { "BaseUri": "https://platform.altinn.no/", - "EventsBaseUri": "https://platform.altinn.no/", "SubscriptionKey": "TODO: Add to local secrets" }If you decide to keep them separate, ensure that this is intentional and documented for clarity.
30-46: LGTM! Consider documenting the key rotation process.The Application section is well-structured with appropriate production settings and placeholders for sensitive information.
The inclusion of both Primary and Secondary Ed25519 key pairs suggests a key rotation mechanism. To enhance maintainability and operational clarity, consider adding a comment or documentation that explains:
- The purpose of having Primary and Secondary keys.
- The process for rotating these keys.
- Any operational procedures or automated systems involved in key management.
This documentation could be added as a comment in this file or referenced in a separate document:
"Ed25519KeyPairs": { // Key pairs for signing operations. // Primary is actively used, Secondary is for rotation purposes. // For key rotation process, see: <link_to_documentation> "Primary": { // ... (existing configuration) }, "Secondary": { // ... (existing configuration) } }
1-47: Consider using a JSON5 parser for configuration files with comments.The static analysis tool Biome is reporting parsing errors for this JSON file, likely due to the presence of comments. While comments in JSON are not part of the official specification, they are widely used and supported by many parsers.
To resolve these warnings while maintaining the valuable comments, consider one of the following options:
- Use JSON5 format, which officially supports comments, and update your configuration parsing to use a JSON5 parser.
- If changing the file format is not feasible, you can ignore these specific Biome warnings for JSON files with comments.
Option 1 example (using JSON5):
{ // This is a valid comment in JSON5 "key": "value" }If you choose to stick with the current format, ensure that your application's JSON parser supports comments to avoid any runtime issues.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json (2)
12-26: LGTM: Maskinporten configuration is well-structured.The Maskinporten configuration is correctly set up for the staging environment:
- Environment is appropriately set to "test".
- ClientId and EncodedJwk are correctly marked for local secrets.
- The scopes listed are consistent with the required Altinn platform permissions.
Consider formatting the Scope value for better readability:
- "Scope": "altinn:events.publish altinn:events.publish.admin altinn:register/partylookup.admin altinn:authorization/authorize.admin altinn:accessmanagement/authorizedparties.admin", + "Scope": "altinn:events.publish altinn:events.publish.admin altinn:register/partylookup.admin altinn:authorization/authorize.admin altinn:accessmanagement/authorizedparties.admin"This change removes the trailing comma, which is not necessary in JSON and could potentially cause issues with some parsers.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-24: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
33-49: LGTM: Application configuration is well-structured.The Application section is correctly set up with appropriate Dialogporten configurations:
- Ed25519 key pairs (Primary and Secondary) are properly structured.
- Sensitive information (Kid, PrivateComponent, PublicComponent) is correctly marked for local secrets.
- The BaseUri is set to a test environment, which is suitable for staging.
For consistency with the Altinn configuration, consider using the same base URL format:
- "BaseUri": "https://platform.tt02.altinn.no/dialogporten", + "BaseUri": "https://platform.tt02.altinn.no/dialogporten/"This change adds a trailing slash to match the format used in the Altinn BaseUri.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json (1)
33-49: LGTM: Application section is well-structured with appropriate security measures.The Application section is correctly configured with placeholders for sensitive information, including the Ed25519KeyPairs for both Primary and Secondary keys. This setup suggests a proper key rotation mechanism is in place.
For improved clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the Secondary key pair:
"Ed25519KeyPairs": { "Primary": { "Kid": "TODO: Add to local secrets", "PrivateComponent": "TODO: Add to local secrets", "PublicComponent": "TODO: Add to local secrets" }, + // Secondary key pair for rotation purposes "Secondary": { "Kid": "TODO: Add to local secrets", "PrivateComponent": "TODO: Add to local secrets", "PublicComponent": "TODO: Add to local secrets" } }This addition would help other developers understand the purpose of having two key pairs.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/appsettings.Development.json (3)
63-63: Approved: Cache disabled for local developmentChanging
DisableCachetotrueis appropriate for a development environment to ensure fresh data. However, be aware that this may impact performance. Consider adding a comment explaining the reasoning behind this change.
65-65: LGTM: In-memory service bus transport enabled for local developmentThe addition of
UseInMemoryServiceBusTransportis appropriate for a local development environment. It simplifies the setup by using an in-memory transport instead of an external message broker.Suggestion: Consider adding a comment in the file or updating the project documentation to explain the purpose and implications of this setting for developers.
Line range hint
1-65: Summary of changes and concernsThe changes to
appsettings.Development.jsongenerally enhance the local development configuration. However, there are a few points that require attention:
- The addition of
DisableAuth: trueraises significant security concerns.- The removal of
DisableShortCircuitOutboxDispatchermentioned in the summary is not visible in the provided code.- Caching has been disabled, which may impact performance during development.
Please address the security implications of disabling authentication, clarify the status of the removed setting, and consider adding comments to explain the reasoning behind these configuration changes.
Consider implementing a safeguard mechanism to prevent development-only settings (especially those with security implications) from being used in production environments.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json (4)
6-22: Acknowledge the use of "TODO" placeholders.The use of "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders for sensitive information like
DialogDbConnectionStringand Maskinporten settings is intentional and follows the project's convention. These placeholders ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud, and are typically overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms.Consider documenting Maskinporten configuration options.
The Maskinporten section includes detailed configuration options with helpful comments. Consider moving these comments to a separate documentation file (e.g.,
docs/MaskinportenConfiguration.md) for better maintainability and to keep the configuration file clean.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
32-47: LGTM: Application configuration for Dialogporten.The Dialogporten configuration is well-structured with an appropriate BaseUri for local development. The use of "TODO" placeholders for sensitive Ed25519KeyPairs information follows the project's convention. The inclusion of both Primary and Secondary key pairs suggests a good practice for key rotation.
Consider adding a link to the key pair generator tool documentation.
The comment about using the
Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.Ed25519KeyPairGeneratoris helpful. Consider adding a link to the tool's documentation or usage instructions, if available, to make it easier for developers to generate the required key pairs.
50-61: LGTM: LocalDevelopment configuration provides fine-grained control.The LocalDevelopment section offers comprehensive control over various aspects of the development environment. The boolean flags for using local development services, disabling auth and cache, and using in-memory service bus transport are appropriate for a flexible development setup.
Consider documenting LocalDevelopment flags.
To improve maintainability and help new developers understand the impact of these settings, consider creating a separate documentation file (e.g.,
docs/LocalDevelopmentFlags.md) that explains the purpose and impact of each flag in the LocalDevelopment section.
1-61: Regarding static analysis errors: Comments in JSON configuration.The static analysis tool reports multiple parsing errors due to the presence of comments in the JSON file. These errors can be safely ignored as they are false positives. The JSON structure itself is valid, and the comments provide valuable context for the configuration options.
However, since JSON doesn't officially support comments, consider one of the following options if you want to maintain the comments:
- Use a JSON5 or JSONC (JSON with Comments) parser that supports comments in JSON-like configuration files.
- Move the comments to a separate documentation file and keep the JSON file strictly compliant.
The current approach of using comments in the JSON file is common in development environments and doesn't affect the functionality, so it's acceptable to keep it as is if it aids in development and configuration understanding.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
README.md (4)
Line range hint
1-52: LGTM! Improved setup instructions for Mac and Windows.The updated instructions for local development setup on Mac and Windows are much more comprehensive and clear. This will greatly assist developers in setting up their environments correctly.
Consider adding a note about the approximate time it might take to complete the setup process, especially for the Windows instructions which involve multiple steps and potential restarts.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~126-~126: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...his. ### Local development settings We are able to toggle some external resources in local...(BE_ABLE_TO)
Line range hint
53-76: LGTM! Clear instructions for running and debugging the project.The new instructions for running the project with
podman composeand debugging in an IDE are clear and helpful. The addition of steps to create a dotnet user secret for the DB connection string is a good security practice.Consider adding a brief explanation of why the user secret is needed for the DB connection string, to help developers understand the security implications.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~126-~126: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...his. ### Local development settings We are able to toggle some external resources in local...(BE_ABLE_TO)
129-138: LGTM! Enhanced local development configuration options.The addition of
UseInMemoryServiceBusTransportand the update toDisableCacheprovide more flexibility for local development. The new section onappsettings.local.jsonis an excellent addition for managing personal configurations.Consider adding a brief explanation of the implications of setting
UseInMemoryServiceBusTransportto true, to help developers understand when they might want to use this option.Also applies to: 139-180
Line range hint
189-339: LGTM! Comprehensive deployment and infrastructure setup instructions.The detailed explanation of the deployment process, manual deployment options, and instructions for setting up new environments are excellent additions to the README. These will greatly assist in maintaining and scaling the project.
Consider adding a section on troubleshooting common deployment issues or a link to a separate troubleshooting guide, if one exists. This could be helpful for developers encountering issues during the deployment process.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~126-~126: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...his. ### Local development settings We are able to toggle some external resources in local...(BE_ABLE_TO)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- .azure/applications/service/main.bicep (2 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/LocalDevelopmentSettings.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/appsettings.Development.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Development/DevelopmentCleanupOutboxHostedService.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.Development.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/appsettings.Development.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/LocalDevelopmentSettings.cs
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Development/DevelopmentCleanupOutboxHostedService.cs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (5)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.Development.json (2)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T11:25:25.336Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json (2)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T11:25:25.336Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json (3)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T11:25:25.336Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: MagnusSandgren PR: digdir/dialogporten#1277 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json:9-23 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T06:58:12.911Z Learning: In this project, the scopes defined in `appsettings.staging.json` (such as `altinn:events.publish`, `altinn:events.publish.admin`, `altinn:register/partylookup.admin`, `altinn:authorization/authorize.admin`, and `altinn:accessmanagement/authorizedparties.admin`) are the scopes required by the application from the Altinn platform. The scopes referenced in the code (like `digdir:dialogporten` and `digdir:dialogporten.serviceprovider`) are the scopes required from consumers of the application.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json (3)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T11:25:25.336Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: MagnusSandgren PR: digdir/dialogporten#1277 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json:9-23 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T06:58:12.911Z Learning: In this project, the scopes defined in `appsettings.staging.json` (such as `altinn:events.publish`, `altinn:events.publish.admin`, `altinn:register/partylookup.admin`, `altinn:authorization/authorize.admin`, and `altinn:accessmanagement/authorizedparties.admin`) are the scopes required by the application from the Altinn platform. The scopes referenced in the code (like `digdir:dialogporten` and `digdir:dialogporten.serviceprovider`) are the scopes required from consumers of the application.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json (3)
Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T11:25:25.336Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: elsand PR: digdir/dialogporten#1182 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.staging.json:4-4 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:24.789Z Learning: In this project, "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders in configuration files are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings are overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms, as documented in `docs/Configuration.md`.Learnt from: MagnusSandgren PR: digdir/dialogporten#1277 File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json:9-23 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T06:58:12.911Z Learning: In this project, the scopes defined in `appsettings.staging.json` (such as `altinn:events.publish`, `altinn:events.publish.admin`, `altinn:register/partylookup.admin`, `altinn:authorization/authorize.admin`, and `altinn:accessmanagement/authorizedparties.admin`) are the scopes required by the application from the Altinn platform. The scopes referenced in the code (like `digdir:dialogporten` and `digdir:dialogporten.serviceprovider`) are the scopes required from consumers of the application.
🪛 Biome
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-15: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 16-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-18: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 18-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.staging.json
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-24: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-24: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.prod.json (1)
2-9: LGTM! Ensure placeholders are replaced in production.The Infrastructure section is correctly structured with placeholders for sensitive information. This aligns with the project's practice of using "TODO: Add to local secrets" to ensure configurations fail fast and loud if not properly set.
Remember to replace these placeholders with actual values when deploying to production. These settings are likely overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms as documented in
docs/Configuration.md.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.test.json (3)
2-9: LGTM: Infrastructure section is well-structured.The Infrastructure section is correctly configured with placeholders for sensitive information. The use of "TODO: Add to local secrets" is intentional and aligns with the project's practices to ensure missing configurations fail fast and loud. These settings will be overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms as documented.
12-26: LGTM: Maskinporten section is well-configured, but clarification needed on scopes.The Maskinporten section is correctly set up for the test environment with appropriate placeholders for sensitive information. However, I noticed that the scopes listed here (e.g.,
altinn:events.publish,altinn:events.publish.admin) differ from those mentioned in the code (likedigdir:dialogportenanddigdir:dialogporten.serviceprovider).Could you please clarify if these scopes are correct for this configuration, and if they align with the application's requirements?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-24: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
1-50: Note on static analysis warnings: Safe to ignore.The static analysis tool (Biome) has reported several parsing errors for this JSON file. These warnings can be safely ignored as they are false positives caused by the presence of comments in the JSON file. Comments in JSON files, while not part of the official JSON specification, are commonly used in configuration files for improved readability and are typically handled correctly by most JSON parsers used in application frameworks.
The actual JSON structure is valid when the comments are ignored. The comments provide valuable context and should be retained for maintainability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 12-12: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 13-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-19: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-20: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 20-24: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 25-25: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.Development.json (2)
Line range hint
1-66: Acknowledge intentional use of "TODO" placeholdersThe configuration file contains several "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders. Based on previous learnings:
- These placeholders are intentionally used to ensure that missing configurations fail fast and loud.
- They are expected to be overridden by Azure app configuration mechanisms in non-development environments.
This approach aligns with the project's established practices for handling sensitive configuration data.
To ensure proper documentation of this approach, please run the following script:
Consider adding a comment in this file referencing the
docs/Configuration.mdfor developers who might not be familiar with this approach.✅ Verification successful
Configuration Documentation Verified
The
Configuration.mdfile exists and includes the necessary documentation regarding the use of "TODO: Add to local secrets" placeholders and the Azure app configuration mechanisms.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and content of the configuration documentation # Test: Check for the existence of the Configuration.md file if [ -f docs/Configuration.md ]; then echo "Configuration.md exists. Checking content..." # Test: Look for mentions of placeholder usage and Azure app configuration grep -i -E "TODO.*placeholder|Azure.*app.*configuration" docs/Configuration.md else echo "Configuration.md not found. Please ensure the file exists and documents the use of placeholders and Azure app configuration." fiLength of output: 1129
58-66: Review local development configuration changesThe changes in the
LocalDevelopmentsection modify the behavior of the application in the development environment:
- Enabling
UseLocalDevelopmentResourceRegister(line 58) may change how resources are managed locally.- Disabling cache with
DisableCache: true(line 64) could impact performance but may be beneficial for development and debugging.- The removal of
DisableShortCircuitOutboxDispatchermight affect outbox message processing.- Adding
UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport: true(line 66) is suitable for local development but differs from production behavior.DisableAuthremainstrue(line 65), which is typical for local development but poses security risks if accidentally used in other environments.To ensure these changes don't unintentionally affect other environments, please run the following script:
Consider implementing environment-specific configuration validation to prevent accidental use of development settings in production environments.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/appsettings.Development.json (2)
62-62: LGTM: New local development setting addedThe addition of
UseLocalDevelopmentCompactJwsGeneratoris consistent with other local development settings and follows the established naming convention.
64-64:⚠️ Potential issueSecurity Concern: Authentication disabled
The
DisableAuthsetting is set totrue, which disables authentication. While this can simplify local development, it poses significant security risks if accidentally used in a non-development environment.Please clarify:
- Was this setting intentionally added? It wasn't mentioned in the change summary.
- Are there safeguards in place to ensure this setting is never used in production?
- Consider adding a prominent comment in the file warning about the security implications of this setting.
To ensure this setting is not present in production configurations, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Authentication Disabled Only in Development Environments
The
DisableAuthsetting is present and set totrueexclusively in development configuration files. This ensures that authentication is disabled only during local development and does not affect production environments.
- Verified Locations:
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/appsettings.Development.jsonsrc/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/appsettings.Development.jsonsrc/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.jsonsrc/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Janitor/appsettings.Development.jsonsrc/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/LocalDevelopmentSettings.csNo instances of
DisableAuthwere found in non-development settings or production configurations.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for DisableAuth in non-development settings files # Test: Search for DisableAuth in non-development settings files rg --type json 'DisableAuth' --glob '!*Development.json' srcLength of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any occurrences of DisableAuth in the entire codebase to ensure it's not referenced outside development settings rg 'DisableAuth' srcLength of output: 858
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Service/appsettings.Development.json (3)
2-4: LGTM: Redis configuration for development environment.The Redis configuration with
"ConnectionString": "localhost:6379"is appropriate for a development environment.
24-30: LGTM: Altinn and AltinnCdn configurations.The Altinn configuration using the test environment (tt02) is appropriate for development. The use of a "TODO" placeholder for the SubscriptionKey follows the project's convention. The AltinnCdn configuration, while minimal, appears sufficient for its purpose.
1-61: Overall assessment: Well-structured development configuration with minor suggestions.The
appsettings.Development.jsonfile is well-organized and provides a comprehensive configuration for the development environment. It follows good practices such as:
- Using appropriate local settings for services like Redis and Altinn.
- Employing "TODO" placeholders for sensitive information, ensuring security and fail-fast behavior.
- Providing fine-grained control over local development features.
The use of comments in the JSON file, while causing static analysis errors, offers valuable context for developers. Consider the suggestions made in previous comments to further improve documentation and maintainability.
In conclusion, the configuration file is approved with minor suggestions for enhancement.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-7: Expected a property but instead found '// Settings from appsettings.json, environment variables or other configuration providers.'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: Expected a property but instead found '// 1. Valid values are test and prod'.
Expected a property here.
(parse)
[error] 9-9: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 10-10: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-11: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 11-13: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-14: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 14-16: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-17: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 17-21: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 22-22: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/appsettings.Development.json (1)
77-78: Review of LocalDevelopment configuration changesThe changes to the LocalDevelopment section include:
- Addition of
"UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport": true- Removal of
"DisableShortCircuitOutboxDispatcher": true(as per the AI summary, not visible in the provided code)These changes suggest a shift in how the service bus is handled in the development environment:
- The new
UseInMemoryServiceBusTransportsetting indicates that an in-memory transport will be used for the service bus in the local development environment. This can be beneficial for testing and debugging without relying on external message brokers.- The removal of
DisableShortCircuitOutboxDispatcherimplies that the outbox pattern implementation might have been adjusted or replaced by the in-memory transport.To ensure these changes are consistent with the codebase, please run the following script:
This will help confirm that the new configuration is properly utilized and the old one is fully removed from the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
All changes related to the LocalDevelopment configuration have been properly implemented:
"UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport": trueis consistently used across the codebase."DisableShortCircuitOutboxDispatcher"has been completely removed.These modifications ensure that the service bus transport is handled in-memory for local development, enhancing testing and debugging capabilities.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new and removed configuration options # Check for usage of UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport echo "Checking for UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport usage:" rg --type csharp "UseInMemoryServiceBusTransport" # Check for any remaining usage of DisableShortCircuitOutboxDispatcher echo "Checking for any remaining DisableShortCircuitOutboxDispatcher usage:" rg --type csharp "DisableShortCircuitOutboxDispatcher"Length of output: 902
.azure/applications/service/main.bicep (4)
Line range hint
23-25: LGTM: New parameter for Service Bus namespace.The addition of the
serviceBusNamespaceNameparameter is well-defined and necessary for the subsequent use in the template.
85-88: LGTM: New environment variable for MassTransit configuration.The addition of the
Infrastructure__MassTransit__Hostenvironment variable is consistent with the PR objective. It correctly uses theserviceBusNamespaceNameparameter to construct the Service Bus host URL.
159-159: LGTM: Dynamic image reference in container app module.The update to use
${serviceName}in the image reference enhances the flexibility of the template. This change allows for easier management of different services without modifying the template structure.
Line range hint
23-25: Summary: Enhancements for MassTransit integration and deployment flexibility.The changes in this file successfully integrate the necessary configurations for the MassTransit outbox system:
- Addition of the
serviceBusNamespaceNameparameter.- New environment variable
Infrastructure__MassTransit__Hostfor the Service Bus connection.- Dynamic image reference in the container app module.
These modifications improve the template's flexibility and align well with the PR objective. The changes are well-structured and maintain consistency with existing patterns in the template.
Also applies to: 85-88, 159-159
README.md (1)
Line range hint
181-188: LGTM! Clear guidelines for pull requests using Conventional Commits.The addition of guidelines for pull request titles using Conventional Commits is excellent. It provides clear instructions for contributors and explains how these titles will be used in the release process and changelog generation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~126-~126: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...his. ### Local development settings We are able to toggle some external resources in local...(BE_ABLE_TO)
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [1.26.0](v1.25.0...v1.26.0) (2024-10-22) ### Features * Add masstransit outbox system ([#1277](#1277)) ([bc04860](bc04860)) ### Bug Fixes * **infrastructure:** use correct networking for servicebus ([#1320](#1320)) ([4fb42bb](4fb42bb)) * Return distinct actions in GetAlinnActions ([#1298](#1298)) ([49948b2](49948b2)) * Upgraded Altinn.ApiClients.Maskinporten, specify TokenExchangeEnvironment ([#1328](#1328)) ([5156799](5156799)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Documentation