feat(infrastructure): create new yt01 infrastructure environment #1290
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes related to the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (4)
12-31: LGTM: Reusable workflows are well-implemented.The use of reusable workflows for checking changes, getting the current version, and publishing is a good practice. The conditional execution of the publish job is efficient.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
GCR_PASSWORDsecret, as it's not immediately clear whyGITHUB_TOKENis used for this.
33-49: LGTM: Infrastructure deployment job is well-structured.The infrastructure deployment job is correctly set up with appropriate conditions, dependencies, and secrets for Azure authentication.
Consider using GitHub environments to manage environment-specific secrets and settings. This could simplify the workflow and improve secret management. For example:
deploy-infra-yt01: environment: yt01 # ... other settings ...This approach would allow you to store environment-specific secrets in GitHub and reference them directly in the workflow.
51-122: Future enhancements are well-planned.The commented-out jobs provide a clear roadmap for future CI/CD pipeline enhancements, including app deployment, slack notifications, and e2e testing.
Consider adding a TODO comment at the top of the file or in the repository's README to track the planned implementation of these additional jobs. This will help team members understand the roadmap for this workflow.
Would you like me to draft a high-level TODO list for these future enhancements?
1-122: Overall, this is a well-structured and comprehensive CI/CD workflow.The workflow for the yt01 environment is thoughtfully designed, incorporating best practices such as:
- Use of reusable workflows
- Conditional job execution
- Proper secret management
- Concurrency control
The implemented jobs provide a solid foundation for the CI/CD process, while the commented-out sections outline a clear roadmap for future enhancements.
As you continue to develop this workflow, consider the following suggestions:
- Implement the planned jobs incrementally, testing each addition thoroughly.
- Regularly review and update the secrets and environment variables used in the workflow.
- Consider setting up branch protection rules that require this workflow to pass before merging PRs.
- As the workflow grows, you might want to split it into multiple files for better maintainability.
Great job on setting up this robust CI/CD pipeline for the yt01 environment!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .azure/infrastructure/yt01.bicepparam (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dispatch-infrastructure.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.azure/infrastructure/yt01.bicepparam (2)
Line range hint
20-46: Review SKU parameters for performance environmentWhile not directly changed in this PR, it's important to verify that the existing SKU parameters are appropriate for the new 'yt01' performance environment. Particularly, consider reviewing:
keyVaultSku: Currently set to 'standard'. Ensure this meets the performance requirements.appConfigurationSku: Set to 'standard'. Verify if this is sufficient for the performance environment.serviceBusSku: Set to 'Premium' with capacity 1. Confirm if this capacity is adequate for expected performance testing loads.redisSku: Set to 'Basic' with capacity 1. For a performance environment, you might want to consider a higher tier or capacity.To help with this review, let's compare these settings with other environments:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare SKU settings across different environment files # Test: Extract and compare SKU settings echo "Comparing SKU settings across environments:" for file in .azure/infrastructure/*.bicepparam; do echo "File: $file" rg -A 1 'param (\w+Sku)' "$file" echo "---" donePlease review the results and consider adjusting the SKUs if necessary for the 'yt01' performance environment.
3-3: Environment parameter updated correctly.The
environmentparameter has been updated from 'soak' to 'yt01', which aligns with the PR objective of creating a new yt01 infrastructure environment. This change is consistent with the comment from the previous review indicating not to use 'soak' for anything at the moment.To ensure consistency across the infrastructure, let's verify if this change is reflected in other relevant files:
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (1)
1-11: LGTM: Workflow setup looks good.The workflow name, triggers, and concurrency settings are well-defined and appropriate for a CI/CD pipeline targeting the yt01 environment.
|
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [1.24.0](v1.23.2...v1.24.0) (2024-10-15) ### Features * **infrastructure:** create new yt01 infrastructure environment ([#1290](#1290)) ([2044070](2044070)) ### Bug Fixes * Fallback to using list auth if details auth fails, remove double cache ([#1274](#1274)) ([54425e7](54425e7)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
<!--- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description Dependent on #1290 <!--- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Related Issue(s) - #1258 ## Verification - [ ] **Your** code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [ ] Manual testing done (required) - [ ] Relevant automated test added (if you find this hard, leave it and we'll help out) ## Documentation - [ ] Documentation is updated (either in `docs`-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in [altinn-studio-docs.](https://github.com/Altinn/altinn-studio-docs), if applicable) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced new Bicep parameter files for various applications, allowing for dynamic configuration based on environment variables. - Added a `deploy-apps` job to the CI/CD workflow for streamlined application deployment to the yt01 environment. - Updated workflow dispatch options to include `yt01` as a selectable environment. - **Bug Fixes** - Streamlined CI/CD configuration by removing commented-out sections for clarity. - **Documentation** - Enhanced parameter definitions for better clarity in deployment configurations. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Description
Create a new infrastructure environment for the performance environment yt01
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
yt01as a deployment environment in manual workflow triggers.Bug Fixes
Chores