chore(k6): Use all 10 service resource types #1575
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/performance/README.md (1)
Line range hint
1-100: Enhance documentation completenessConsider the following improvements:
- Expand the TODO section with more context about what needs to be fixed in reporting
- Provide more details about the Grafana reporting setup and requirements
- Add expected performance metrics or benchmarks for the tests
- Include troubleshooting section for common issues
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
tests/k6/tests/performancetest_data/endusers-yt01.csvis excluded by!**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/performance/README.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/performance/README.md (1)
7-7: Verify the prerequisites link path
The path to prerequisites has been updated. Let's verify if this path is correct.
✅ Verification successful
The prerequisites link path is correct and valid
The verification confirms that:
- The referenced path
../../../README.md#Prerequisitescorrectly points to the k6 README.md file attests/k6/README.md - The Prerequisites section exists in the target file and contains the required k6 setup information
- The relative path navigation (../../../) from
tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/performance/README.mdtotests/k6/README.mdis accurate
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the prerequisites section exists in the referenced README
# and confirm the path is correct
# Check if the file exists
if fd -t f "README.md" | grep -q "../../../README.md"; then
echo "File exists, checking for Prerequisites section..."
grep -A 5 "# Prerequisites" "../../../README.md" || echo "Prerequisites section not found"
fi
Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the path and prerequisites
# First, list all README.md files in the repository to understand the structure
echo "All README.md files in the repository:"
fd -t f "README.md"
# Then, specifically check the content of the referenced file
echo -e "\nChecking content of tests/k6/README.md:"
if [ -f "tests/k6/README.md" ]; then
grep -A 5 "Prerequisites" "tests/k6/README.md" || echo "Prerequisites section not found"
fi
# Also check the current file to see the context
echo -e "\nChecking current file content:"
cat "tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/performance/README.md"
Length of output: 5833
|
Description
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)