chore(webapi): Remove specific mediatypes on ContentValueDto #1614
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request focuses on updating documentation for the Dialogporten API, specifically modifying the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (1)
318-318: Documentation update looks good, but needs the actual link.The updated description appropriately removes specific media type references in favor of a more maintainable external list. However, the "(link TBD)" placeholder needs to be replaced with the actual documentation link.
Please update the placeholder with the actual documentation link when available.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json(2 hunks)src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/Common/Content/ContentValueDto.cs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/Common/Content/ContentValueDto.cs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (1)
Line range hint 1-6973: Verify consistency of media type descriptions across the schema.
The schema contains multiple references to media types in various components. Let's verify that all related descriptions are consistent with this change.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to find media type related content:
Based on the search results, I can see that there are two main types of mediaType descriptions in the schema:
- For content mediaType:
"description": "Media type of the content, this can also indicate that the content is embeddable.\nFor a list of supported media types, see (link TBD)."
- For attachment mediaType:
"description": "The media type of the attachment."
These descriptions serve different purposes and are correctly differentiated - one for content that may be embeddable and another for attachments. The descriptions are consistent within their respective contexts and don't need to be aligned since they describe different concepts.
The schema maintains proper consistency in media type descriptions across different components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other media type descriptions that might need similar updates
rg -A 1 'mediaType.*description' | grep -v 'this can also indicate'
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all mediaType descriptions in the schema
rg -i "mediaType.*description" -A 2
Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all mediaType fields and their context
rg -i '"mediaType"' -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 57689
|
Description
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)