-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nullability fixes for chaos outcome strategy #1982
Conversation
@martintmk If you want I can help with this PR by fixing the tests (and resolving the merge conflict). |
That would be great as I won't be able to touch this in next two weeks (vacation). |
Sure, no problem. Enjoy your vacation! 😏 Please allow me (@peter-csala) to contribute to your branch. |
The branch is here rather than in a fork, so I'm not sure that's doable. If you want to pick up the work, copy the branch locally into your fork and start a new PR. |
Ohh okay, I thought Martin was working on a fork as well. I'll create a new PR then. |
4116648
to
8de46fa
Compare
8de46fa
to
61cfa3a
Compare
@martincostello This one should be ready, after this is merged we can go ahead with 8.4.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not convinced this was worth doing in the end as the net effect is just a little less code at the expense of allowing the compiler to assign null when that isn't actually allowed, so what is there already feels more correct to me to be honest, but if it makes it consistent with all the other options types, we might as well change it.
Details on the issue fix or feature implementation
Fixing some incorrect nullability annotatations.
Confirm the following