Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

One sided Other ID relationships #3233

Closed
Jegelewicz opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

One sided Other ID relationships #3233

Jegelewicz opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
Component Loader Things involved in Round Five of the component loader discussions Function-ObjectRecord Priority-High (Needed for work) High because this is causing a delay in important collection work..

Comments

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

Am I crazy, or don't we have some sort of report of one sided other ID relationships?

image

and

image

are an example.

I'd like to hunt all of these down and add the reciprocal. I thought this would get it for me, but there's nothing there.
image

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Nov 20, 2020

There's an email notification. It'll need redone when that bulkloader is redone.

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member Author

DOH! I knew there was SOMETHING! Shall I leave this open as a reminder? If not necessary, please close.

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Nov 20, 2020

Yes leave it.

Blocked by #2974

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Dec 18, 2020

The review period for #2974 has passed and this can proceed.

This is blocking #2292; we have to find another way of handling potential reciprocals before we can simplify the loader. I can figure that out so going next task, needs prioritized.

@dustymc dustymc added this to the Next Task milestone Dec 18, 2020
@Jegelewicz Jegelewicz added the Priority-High (Needed for work) High because this is causing a delay in important collection work.. label Dec 18, 2020
@campmlc
Copy link

campmlc commented Dec 18, 2020 via email

@dustymc dustymc modified the milestones: Next Task, Active Development Jan 5, 2021
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Jan 6, 2021

Next release will have a new email alert, a new tool to download unreciprocated relationships (which can then be loaded in the Identifiers/Relationships bulkloader, which is also new), and an entire new back-end to gather the data.

The report will filter for relationships which can be reciprocated. Attached is an unfiltered report using current production data. Code is in scripts/gatherUnFilteredReciprocalRelations in case anyone needs this in the future. The report contains essentially 4 things:

  1. things which will be in the reciprocal report
  2. things outside of Arctos ("MSB:Para:28906","USNM: National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution","602540","host of")
  3. data entry problems which could be fixed ("MSB:Para:28497","MSB:Mamm","MSB:Mamm:152843","host of")
  4. Ambiguous local references which could perhaps be disambiguated ("MSB:Para:29042","NK","275281","host of")

temp_recip_oids_nofilter.csv.zip

Summary:

   g      | count 
-------------+-------
 ALMNH:ES    |     6
 ALMNH:Inv   |    17
 CHAS:Bird   |     2
 CHAS:EH     |     4
 CHAS:Herp   |   793
 CHAS:Mamm   |    16
 DGR:Mamm    |     2
 DMNS:Bird   |     4
 DMNS:Inv    |     3
 DMNS:Mamm   |   131
 DMNS:Para   |    19
 HWML:Para   |     9
 KNWR:Ento   |   325
 KNWR:Herb   |     4
 KNWR:Inv    |     1
 MSB:Bird    |   463
 MSB:Host    |   281
 MSB:Mamm    |  5034
 MSB:Para    |  1832
 MVZ:Bird    |    60
 MVZ:Egg     |    13
 MVZ:Mamm    |     2
 NMMNH:Bird  |     4
 NMMNH:Mamm  |     1
 NMMNH:Paleo |    22
 NMU:Mamm    |     8
 NMU:Para    |     8
 OWU:Fish    |     5
 UAM:Art     |    26
 UAM:EH      |    26
 UAM:Ento    |   246
 UAM:Inv     |     4
 UAM:Mamm    |   274
 USNPC:Para  |     6
 UTEP:Ento   |   147
 UTEP:Herp   |    10
 UWYMV:Egg   |     2

@dustymc dustymc closed this as completed Jan 7, 2021
@dustymc dustymc added the Component Loader Things involved in Round Five of the component loader discussions label Feb 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component Loader Things involved in Round Five of the component loader discussions Function-ObjectRecord Priority-High (Needed for work) High because this is causing a delay in important collection work..
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants