-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code Table Request - remove 'reproductive' from age class #6569
Comments
@DerekSikes do you need all of the attributes that are currently age class = reproductive changed to caste = reproductive? @dustymc as far as I can tell, @DerekSikes (UAM:Ento) is the only one using this term. I say we clean it up as he has suggested. |
Yes, UAM:Ento only. https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctcaste doesn't contain the value (and doesn't seem to me like it should, but that's what code table issues exist to discover), there will need to be a CT request or alternate path. There are tools which can handle this, feel free to use them and let me know when I can remove the CT value! |
Thanks & yes, adding the term 'reproductive' to the caste table would be good & then deleting it from the age class table. If all my records with age class = reproductive could be changed to caste=reproductive instead, that'd be great! |
@dustymc @ArctosDB/arctos-code-table-administrators I propose we do exactly what @DerekSikes is asking. I cannot find an issue requesting the addition of 'reproductive' to age class, possibly because it was added before that process was in place? In any case, UAM:Ento is the only user. @DerekSikes the one thing we DO need is a definition. Can you provide one? |
reproductive: an adult eusocial insect capable of reproduction of
unspecified sex (queen/gyne/drone).
…On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:36 PM Teresa Mayfield-Meyer < ***@***.***> wrote:
@dustymc <https://github.com/dustymc>
@ArctosDB/arctos-code-table-administrators
<https://github.com/orgs/ArctosDB/teams/arctos-code-table-administrators>
I propose we do exactly what @DerekSikes <https://github.com/DerekSikes>
is asking. I cannot find an issue requesting the addition of 'reproductive'
to age class, possibly because it was added before that process was in
place? In any case, UAM:Ento is the only user.
@DerekSikes <https://github.com/DerekSikes> the one thing we DO need is a
definition. Can you provide one?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6569 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACFNUM262ZVYCNJYPUDHP5DXTAJMTANCNFSM6AAAAAA22QL5FQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
*Derek S. Sikes*, Curator of Insects, Professor of Entomology
University of Alaska Museum (UAM), University of Alaska Fairbanks
1962 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775-6960
***@***.*** phone: 907-474-6278 he/him/his
University of Alaska Museum <https://www.uaf.edu/museum/collections/ento/>
- search 393,654 digitized arthropod records
<https://arctos.database.museum/uam_ento>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Interested in Alaskan Entomology? Join the Alaska Entomological
Society and / or sign up for the email listserv "Alaska Entomological
Network" at
http://www.akentsoc.org/contact_us
|
I can't see any way that this is a caste. It's not age either, but there's a whole (sad and abandoned) Issue for that, and somewhere in there https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctattribute_code_tables#life_stage - 100% denormalized, I think! - appeared. The last thing we need is a third arbitrary pigeonhole for this sort of data, suggest this be merged and https://github.com/ArctosDB/code-table-work/issues/62 prioritized. |
I know it isn't the final say, but perhaps we should be thinking about data aggregation and how our data will play with others'.
And looking at that - I think that all of the UAM:Ento uses of age class = reproductive should just get moved to reproductive data = reproductive. Fair? @DerekSikes @dustymc |
It should be! WHY are we making up our own stuff in 2023?! (But we can't adopt bare terms - eg '"native" meaning whatever you think it should mean' is an illusion of "good data" without any actual constraints or even guidelines. We should be following concepts, not terms.) (And on that note - has anyone checked what age class means in Arctos?)
Maybe, but that's free-text so would be a bit of a downgrade. |
Maybe we need a term that includes a controlled vocabulary? reproductive condition - The reproductive condition of the biological individual(s) represented in the catalog record. Code table terms: There have also been discussion of lactation and perhaps other things within the RANGES group. Just throwing this out there... |
reproductive: an adult eusocial insect capable of reproduction of unspecified sex (queen/gyne/drone) is a caste of unspecified sex. Not a sterile worker. I see no problem with having less-precise and more-precise caste terms. Obviously if the sex becomes known the best practice would be to replace 'reproductive' (or add) with 'queen' or 'gyne' etc. |
@ArctosDB/arctos-code-table-administrators @DerekSikes has asked that we move this information to caste. @dustymc has made his opposition known. We are trying to get the age class table cleaned up and this is one of the things that just doesn't belong can we agree on how to handle it? |
I thought this was all mapped to life stage? (But 'reproductive' is likely a synonym of 'adult' - method is really important....) |
reproductives are castes of social insects that have sterile workers. This belongs in Caste |
@DerekSikes this might all make sense if you'd care to flesh that definition out, https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctage_class#reproductive isn't terribly helpful. How's this relate to https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctage_class#non_reproductive? |
I think this definition is fine. I support moving this value to the Caste table as suggested. I second Dusty's question about non reproductive. |
The more typical term for non reproductive is 'worker'. These are the sterile bees, wasps, and ants in eusocial colonies. I suggest changing 'non reproductive' to 'worker' |
These are also all UAM:Ento so I don't think that's a problem. Definitions please.... |
@DerekSikes can I move all https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctage_class#non_reproductive to https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctcaste#worker now? Once #7325 is resolved I'll also want to move all https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctage_class#reproductive to whatever it becomes. HELP! |
Yes, 'non reproductive' can become 'worker'; a definition could be Worker insects are those within social insect colonies (bees, ants, wasps and termites) that are typically not capable of reproducing. |
Done
That's about what's there, https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctcaste#worker |
yeah, I added 'typically' because some workers can lay unfertilized eggs which become males if their sisters don't find and kill the eggs.. so they typically do not reproduce, but some can |
reproductive should not be listed in the options for 'age class' - this is a caste designator, not an age designator. We already have a attribute called 'caste' to handle this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: