Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use delete_multiple_objects when storage is aws #392

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2019

Conversation

JanStevens
Copy link
Contributor

This is an improvement on existing code in MR #352

We now check if the storage is aws? and the connection responds to delete_multiple_objects

The test test the case with aws and delete_multiple_objects and the case without aws and delete_multiple_objects

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 26, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 369

  • 5 of 5 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+2.3%) to 64.281%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 344: 2.3%
Covered Lines: 6504
Relevant Lines: 10118

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 369

  • 5 of 5 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+2.3%) to 64.297%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 344: 2.3%
Covered Lines: 6150
Relevant Lines: 9565

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 26, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 369

  • 5 of 5 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+2.2%) to 64.244%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 344: 2.2%
Covered Lines: 7566
Relevant Lines: 11777

💛 - Coveralls

@PikachuEXE PikachuEXE merged commit a1f6ce4 into AssetSync:master Dec 27, 2019
@JanStevens JanStevens deleted the feature/destroy-in-bulk branch December 27, 2019 10:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants