This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.
Update atom-linter to version 7.0.0 🚀 #35
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The CI build status is all green, merging! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello lovely humans,
atom-linter just published its new version 7.0.0.
This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of atom-linter.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Good luck with your project ✨
You rock!
🌴
The new version differs by 15 commits .
57020a3:arrow_up: Bump version to 7.0.016d3c96:no_entry: Git and NPM ignore .DS_Store fileed468f1Merge pull request #141 from steelbrain/steelbrain/return-rangeef9a8bb:memo: Document change in CHANGELOG122d22f:arrow_up: Upgrade specs to match latest behavior8468dbc:art: Return Range from rangeFromLineNumber5fd51b3:fire: Remove Travis and AppVeyor Ci configurationse713642Merge pull request #140 from steelbrain/steelbrain/enhance-range-from-line-number-behaviorbb4e857:art: Move a check to the endc5dd5ca:white_check_mark: Add more specs61cc287:white_check_mark: Upgrade specs to new behavior972bf2b:memo: Document change in CHANGELOGa06838e:new: Make rangeFromLineNumber return entire line if no colStart is provided7e9bbbcMerge pull request #138 from steelbrain/steelbrain/maintenance55abad6:arrow_up: Upgrade to latest ESLint configSee the full diff.
This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡
greenkeeper upgrade