Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync worker kickoff #11

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Mar 20, 2023
Merged

Sync worker kickoff #11

merged 13 commits into from
Mar 20, 2023

Conversation

psrpinto
Copy link
Member

psrpinto added 13 commits March 7, 2023 17:23
So that features are available through the Platform. I think logically it makes sense to have the Platform load the features, as where features are coming from depends on the Platform. On Web they come from localStorage, on other platforms they might come from elsewhere.

This will allow us to inject the FeatureSet into a SyncFactory class in next commits.
When sync is running in a worker, the start() method will need to be async, as we will need to send messages to the worker to start the sync.
I think it makes sense to not have the logic of whether sync runs in a worker in Client, as that is platform-specific, so that logic should not be in the matrix layer.
Will proxy calls to a worker. Doesn't do anything yet.
... and the browser supports SharedWorkers.
Doesn't do anything yet.
Without this the build fails.
Will address this in a follow-up PR as it's not trivial to fix.
@psrpinto psrpinto self-assigned this Mar 20, 2023
@psrpinto psrpinto mentioned this pull request Mar 20, 2023
4 tasks
@psrpinto psrpinto marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2023 16:46
@psrpinto psrpinto marked this pull request as draft March 20, 2023 16:46
@psrpinto psrpinto changed the base branch from master to integration-sync-worker March 20, 2023 16:47
@psrpinto psrpinto marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2023 16:47
@psrpinto psrpinto requested a review from ashfame March 20, 2023 16:47
@psrpinto
Copy link
Member Author

Replaces #8, now targetting integration-sync-worker branch instead of master.

@psrpinto psrpinto mentioned this pull request Mar 20, 2023
@psrpinto psrpinto merged commit cd6c759 into integration-sync-worker Mar 20, 2023
@psrpinto psrpinto added the upstream-contribution-candidate Supposed to go to upstream as a PR once base branch is merged label Mar 27, 2023
psrpinto added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
@psrpinto psrpinto added sync-worker and removed upstream-contribution-candidate Supposed to go to upstream as a PR once base branch is merged labels Mar 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants