-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 798
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Connection: work around a WP user caching bug #40188
Conversation
Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.
Interested in more tips and information?
|
Thank you for your PR! When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:
This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖 The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available. Follow this PR Review Process:
Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This tests well, thanks!
As an aside I'm curious - is the goal with this PR just to create a temporary workaround until and if the core bug gets fixed? Should we add a @todo
or similar in order to have a reminder to come back to this in the future?
Thanks @coder-karen! |
Proposed changes:
WP bug #62003 leads to inconsistent format of cached user data in certain circumstances.
It happens if only one field gets fetched from the database, so we add
ID
to work around the issue.Other information:
Jetpack product discussion
https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/62003
p1731513241019199-slack-C05PV073SG3
p1725570377885549-slack-C7YPW6K40
Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?
No.
Testing instructions:
First try to reproduce the issue on
trunk
.debug.log
: