Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

js-packages: Fix textdomains #40368

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

js-packages: Fix textdomains #40368

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

anomiex
Copy link
Contributor

@anomiex anomiex commented Nov 27, 2024

Proposed changes:

We have a bunch of packages that, for historical reasons, use "jetpack" rather than a unique text domain. Fix them now.

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

Testing instructions:

  • Check the Composer-package and plugin artifacts. There should be no relevant changes, thanks to use of @automattic/babel-plugin-replace-textdomain when bundling.
    • The only change I noticed was that the move of a few translator comments from outside a sprintf to inside is reflected in the bundles.

We have a bunch of packages that, for historical reasons, use "jetpack"
rather than a unique text domain. Fix them now.
@anomiex anomiex added [Status] Needs Review To request a review from fellow Jetpack developers. Label will be renamed soon. [Type] Janitorial [Pri] Normal labels Nov 27, 2024
@anomiex anomiex requested a review from a team November 27, 2024 18:11
@anomiex anomiex self-assigned this Nov 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WordPress.com Simple site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin, and enable the fix/js-package-textdomains branch.

    • For jetpack-mu-wpcom changes, also add define( 'JETPACK_MU_WPCOM_LOAD_VIA_BETA_PLUGIN', true ); to your wp-config.php file.
  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:

    bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack fix/js-package-textdomains
    
    bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack-mu-wpcom-plugin fix/js-package-textdomains
    

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Choose a review path based on your changes:
    • A. Team Review: add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label
      • For most changes, including minor cross-team impacts.
      • Example: Updating a team-specific component or a small change to a shared library.
    • B. Crew Review: add the "[Status] Needs Review" label
      • For significant changes to core functionality.
      • Example: Major updates to a shared library or complex features.
    • C. Both: Start with Team, then request Crew
      • For complex changes or when you need extra confidence.
      • Example: Refactor affecting multiple systems.
  3. Get at least one approval before merging.

Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!

zinigor
zinigor previously approved these changes Nov 28, 2024
Copy link
Member

@zinigor zinigor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see anything wrong with this at first glance, but should we wait until we branch 14.1 just to make sure we don't introduce a lot of fuzzy strings right before the release?

@anomiex
Copy link
Contributor Author

anomiex commented Dec 2, 2024

It shouldn't introduce fuzzy strings since the textdomains in the JS all get rewritten in the plugins anyway.

Copy link
Member

@zinigor zinigor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know that we won't introduce fuzzies with this! I'm pretty sure though that Thomas will branch off 14.1 before you'll be able to merge it :)

@anomiex
Copy link
Contributor Author

anomiex commented Dec 2, 2024

I probably could have gotten in just under the wire, but I'll wait anyway since it's happening now. 🙂

@anomiex anomiex merged commit d56cb8a into trunk Dec 2, 2024
75 checks passed
@anomiex anomiex deleted the fix/js-package-textdomains branch December 2, 2024 17:32
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Review To request a review from fellow Jetpack developers. Label will be renamed soon. label Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants