-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: calls to non-existent contracts in the AVM simulator return failure #10051
Merged
+137
−16
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ contract AvmTest { | |
|
||
// Libs | ||
use dep::aztec::context::gas::GasOpts; | ||
use dep::aztec::context::public_context::call; | ||
use dep::aztec::macros::{functions::{private, public}, storage::storage}; | ||
use dep::aztec::oracle::get_contract_instance::{ | ||
get_contract_instance_class_id_avm, get_contract_instance_deployer_avm, | ||
|
@@ -515,6 +516,23 @@ contract AvmTest { | |
/************************************************************************ | ||
* Nested calls | ||
************************************************************************/ | ||
#[public] | ||
fn nested_call_to_nothing() { | ||
let garbageAddress = AztecAddress::from_field(42); | ||
AvmTest::at(garbageAddress).nested_call_to_nothing().call(&mut context) | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[public] | ||
fn nested_call_to_nothing_recovers() { | ||
let garbageAddress = AztecAddress::from_field(42); | ||
let gas = [1, 1]; | ||
let success = call(gas, garbageAddress, &[]); | ||
assert( | ||
!success, | ||
"Nested CALL instruction should return failure if target contract does not exist", | ||
); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[public] | ||
fn nested_call_to_add_with_gas( | ||
arg_a: Field, | ||
|
@@ -644,5 +662,6 @@ contract AvmTest { | |
//let _ = nested_call_to_add(1, 2); | ||
//dep::aztec::oracle::debug_log::debug_log("nested_static_call_to_add"); | ||
//let _ = nested_static_call_to_add(1, 2); | ||
//let _ = nested_call_to_nothing_recovers(); | ||
Comment on lines
662
to
+665
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[Re: lines +661 to +665]
Unrelated but i think we can enable these. They should've never been commented out. See this comment inline on Graphite. |
||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See my later comments, maybe call these functions something along the lines of
"nested_call_via_interface" and "nested_call_via_oracle"
you can pass the address as a param and then you don't need the "nothing".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, but for the "recovers" version, I like that I can confirm in-Noir that I can gracefully recover from the failed call