-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: small fixes to avm witgen #10749
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
IlyasRidhuan
commented
Dec 15, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- Add tree snapshots to nested call contexts
- Handle DA limits properly in witgen
- Respect staticcall in tree operations
IlyasRidhuan
changed the title
fix: add tree snapshots to ctx
fix: small fixes to avm witgen
Dec 16, 2024
dbanks12
approved these changes
Dec 16, 2024
Comment on lines
+2646
to
2845
uint32_t unique_public_data_slot_writes = get_public_data_writes_count(); | ||
AvmError error = current_ext_call_ctx.is_static_call ? AvmError::STATIC_CALL_ALTERATION | ||
: unique_public_data_slot_writes >= MAX_PUBLIC_DATA_UPDATE_REQUESTS_PER_TX | ||
? AvmError::SIDE_EFFECT_LIMIT_REACHED | ||
: AvmError::NO_ERROR; | ||
|
||
if (storage_write_counter >= MAX_PUBLIC_DATA_UPDATE_REQUESTS_PER_TX) { | ||
if (!is_ok(error)) { | ||
// NOTE: the circuit constraint for this limit should only be applied |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should be able to remove error = ... SIDE..LIMIT..
below
IlyasRidhuan
force-pushed
the
ir/12-15-fix_add_tree_snapshots_to_ctx
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 17, 2024 11:54
fe89dcc
to
c114f31
Compare
IlyasRidhuan
force-pushed
the
ir/12-15-fix_add_tree_snapshots_to_ctx
branch
from
December 18, 2024 10:16
c114f31
to
e81f2ad
Compare
Changes to circuit sizes
🧾 Summary (100% most significant diffs)
Full diff report 👇
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.