Introduce new API version for Microsoft.ProviderHub 2021-09-01-preview

[laxmankumar12]

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

1. What's the purpose of the update?
   • new service onboarding
   • new API version
   • update existing version for new feature
   • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
   • Other, please clarify
2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
   • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
   • SDK of Python
   • SDK of Java
   • SDK of Js
   • SDK of Go
   • PowerShell
   • CLI
   • Terraform
   • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

• I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
• I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
• Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

• Change to data plane APIs
• Adding new properties
• All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

• Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

  • Adding a new service
  • Adding new API(s)
  • Adding a new API version
    -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.

• Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

• If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

• Removing API(s) in a stable version
• Removing properties in a stable version
• Removing API version(s) in a stable version
• Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
• Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

[openapi-workflow-bot]

Hi, @laxmankumar12 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.

PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.

For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator

If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

[openapi-workflow-bot]

[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

[openapi-pipeline-app]

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️⚠️LintDiff: 32 Warnings warning [Detail]

• Linted configuring files (Based on source branch, openapi-validator v1.10.1 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.10 )
  • providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md tag:package-2021-09-01-preview
• Linted configuring files (Based on target branch, openapi-validator v1.10.1 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.10 )
  • providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md tag:default

The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3880
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3904
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: origin Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3857
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: actionType Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3873
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enabled Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L2492
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3853
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enabled Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4419
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: allowNoncompliantCollectionResponse Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4938
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'ProvisioningState' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L2199
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'expeditedRollout' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L2501
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'endpointType' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L2919
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'readiness' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3044
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'LocalizedOperationDisplayDefinition' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3690
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'LocalizedOperationDefinition' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3842
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'origin' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3857
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'actionType' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3873
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'properties' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3880
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'OperationsContentProperties' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3883
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'properties' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3904
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'endpointType' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4296
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'ResourceConcurrencyControlOption' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4400
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'policy' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4403
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'ResourceGraphConfiguration' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4416
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'enabled' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4419
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'apiVersion' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4422
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'resourceConcurrencyControlOptions' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4625
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'resourceGraphConfiguration' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4631
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'management' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4638
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'OpenApiConfiguration' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4927
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'OpenApiValidation' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4935

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L2373
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L2641
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3580
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3670
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4186
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4658
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4898
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: marketplaceType Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3218
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: resourceAccessPolicy Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3339
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: origin Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3647
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: actionType Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3663
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: marketplaceType Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4473
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: type Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4746
⚠️ R2064 - LROStatusCodesReturnTypeSchema	200/201 Responses of long running operations must have a schema definition for return type. OperationId: 'ProviderRegistrations_CreateOrUpdate', Response code: '201' Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L941
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enabled Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L2884
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enabled Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3389
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isCheckedIn Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3499
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3643
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: preflightSupported Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4048
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enabled Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4258
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableDefaultValidation Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4375
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: validationRequired Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4389
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: crossResourceGroupMoveEnabled Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4392
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: crossSubscriptionMoveEnabled Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4395
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableAsyncOperation Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4534
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableThirdPartyS2S Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4541
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isPureProxy Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4551
⚠️ R4006 - DeprecatedXmsCodeGenerationSetting	The x-ms-code-generation-setting extension is being deprecated. Please remove it and move settings to readme file for code generation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L7
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'TrafficRegions' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L2221
⚠️ R4021 - DescriptionAndTitleMissing	'CustomRolloutSpecification' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L2232

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for ModelValidation.

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️❌Cross-Version Breaking Changes: 7 Errors, 10 Warnings failed [Detail]

• Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.9.0)
  • current:preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json compared with base:stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json
  • current:preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json compared with base:preview/2021-06-01-preview/providerhub.json

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:

Rule	Message
❌ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'contents' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3903:7 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L3609:7
❌ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'name' renamed or removed? Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L3552:7
❌ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'isDataAction' renamed or removed? Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L3552:7
❌ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'origin' renamed or removed? Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L3552:7
❌ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'display' renamed or removed? Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L3552:7
❌ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'actionType' renamed or removed? Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L3552:7
❌ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'properties' renamed or removed? Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L3552:7
⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf	The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L789:13 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L789:13
⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf	The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L806:13 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L806:13
⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf	The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3904:9 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L3596:9
⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf	The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L3896:5 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/stable/2020-11-20/providerhub.json#L3604:5

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with latest preview version:

Rule	Message
⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf	The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L1352:13 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-06-01-preview/providerhub.json#L1352:13
⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf	The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L1507:13 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-06-01-preview/providerhub.json#L1507:13
⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf	The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L1671:13 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-06-01-preview/providerhub.json#L1671:13
⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf	The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L1844:13 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-06-01-preview/providerhub.json#L1844:13
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'skuSettings' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4897:7 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-06-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4859:7
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty	The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'provisioningState' renamed or removed? New: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4897:7 Old: Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-06-01-preview/providerhub.json#L4859:7

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️❌[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 1 Errors, 6 Warnings failed [Detail]

• The following tags are being changed in this PR
• providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2021-09-01-preview

The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

Rule	Message
❌ AutorestCore/Exception	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"Error: Plugin pre-namer reported failure."
⚠️ Modeler/MissingType	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"The schema 'ResourceProviderManagement-resourceAccessRolesItem' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///home/vsts/work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/providerhub/resource-manager/Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#/components/schemas/ResourceProviderManagement-resourceAccessRolesItem"
⚠️ Modeler/MissingType	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"The schema 'ResourceProviderManifestProperties-metadata' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///home/vsts/work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/providerhub/resource-manager/Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#/components/schemas/ResourceProviderManifestProperties-metadata"
⚠️ Modeler/MissingType	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"The schema 'ResourceType-metadata' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///home/vsts/work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/providerhub/resource-manager/Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#/components/schemas/ResourceType-metadata"
⚠️ Modeler/MissingType	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"The schema 'ResourceProviderManifest-metadata' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///home/vsts/work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/providerhub/resource-manager/Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#/components/schemas/ResourceProviderManifest-metadata"
⚠️ Modeler/MissingType	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"The schema 'OperationsDefinition-properties' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///home/vsts/work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/providerhub/resource-manager/Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#/components/schemas/OperationsDefinition-properties"
⚠️ Modeler/MissingType	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"The schema 'LocalizedOperationDefinition-properties' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///home/vsts/work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/providerhub/resource-manager/Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json#/components/schemas/LocalizedOperationDefinition-properties"
💬 AutorestCore/Exception	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"
💬 AutorestCore/Exception	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"
💬 AutorestCore/Exception	"readme":"providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09-01-preview", "details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"

️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

[openapi-pipeline-app]

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 

️️✔️[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - providerhub/mgmt/2020-11-20/providerhub - v57.1.0

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python warning [Detail]

• ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 5567317. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
  cmderr	[automation_init.sh] ERROR: pip's dependency resolver does not currently take into account all the packages that are installed. This behaviour is the source of the following dependency conflicts.
  cmderr	[automation_init.sh] azure-mgmt-core 1.3.0 requires azure-core<2.0.0,>=1.15.0, but you have azure-core 1.6.0 which is incompatible.
  cmderr	[automation_init.sh] ERROR: pip's dependency resolver does not currently take into account all the packages that are installed. This behaviour is the source of the following dependency conflicts.
  cmderr	[automation_init.sh] azure-mgmt-core 1.3.0 requires azure-core<2.0.0,>=1.15.0, but you have azure-core 1.6.0 which is incompatible.
  cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
  command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
  warn	No package detected after generation

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

• ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 5567317. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
  command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
  cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-30 00:32:00 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find version for "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-providerhub"
  cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-30 00:32:00 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.1"
  cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-30 00:32:00 INFO autorest --version=3.6.0 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.37 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/providerhub/azure-resourcemanager-providerhub --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.providerhub   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL  ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md
  cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-30 00:32:38 INFO [CI][Success] Write to ci.yml
  cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-30 00:32:38 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
  cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-30 00:32:38 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-providerhub
  cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-30 00:32:38 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
  cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-30 00:32:38 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
  cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-30 00:32:38 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom

• ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-providerhub [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
  • pom.xml
  • azure-resourcemanager-providerhub-1.0.0-beta.1-javadoc.jar
  • azure-resourcemanager-providerhub-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
  • azure-resourcemanager-providerhub-1.0.0-beta.1-sources.jar

  cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-30 00:34:01 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-providerhub
  cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-30 00:34:01 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
  cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-30 00:34:01 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-providerhub-1.0.0-beta.1-javadoc.jar
  cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-30 00:34:01 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-providerhub-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
  cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-30 00:34:01 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-providerhub-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
  cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-30 00:34:01 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/15723/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-providerhub/azure-resourcemanager-providerhub-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-providerhub-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-providerhub -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-providerhub-1.0.0-beta.1.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
  ```"}

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

• ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 5567317. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
  command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

• ️✔️providerhub/mgmt/2020-11-20/providerhub [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]

  info	[Changelog] This is a new package

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-js warning [Detail]

• ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 5567317. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
  command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.7.0 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md
  warn	No file changes detected after generation
  warn	No package detected after generation

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

• ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 5567317. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
  command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-5.0
  command	autorest --version=V2 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/providerhub/resource-manager/readme.md
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied

• ️✔️Microsoft.Azure.Management.ProviderHub [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
  • Microsoft.Azure.Management.ProviderHub.1.0.0-beta.1.nupkg
  • Microsoft.Azure.Management.ProviderHub.1.0.0-beta.1.symbols.nupkg

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

[openapi-workflow-bot]

Hi @laxmankumar12, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

Task	How to fix	Priority	Support (Microsoft alias)
Avocado	Fix-Avocado	High	ruowan
Semantic validation	Fix-SemanticValidation-Error	High	raychen, jianyxi
Model validation	Fix-ModelValidation-Error	High	raychen,jianyxi
LintDiff	Fix-LintDiff	high	jianyxi, ruoxuan

If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

[zhenglaizhang]

@laxmankumar12 please help fix the avocado and prettier check issues #15723 (comment)

[sanjaiganesh]

"PrivateResourceProviderConfigurations": {

singular

---

Refers to: specification/providerhub/resource-manager/Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json:4051 in 1571eee. [](commit_id = 1571eee, deletion_comment = False)

[sanjaiganesh]

    "enabledSubscriptions": {

nit - description

---

Refers to: specification/providerhub/resource-manager/Microsoft.ProviderHub/preview/2021-09-01-preview/providerhub.json:4054 in 1571eee. [](commit_id = 1571eee, deletion_comment = False)

[laxmankumar12]

@laxmankumar12 there is cross version breaking changes #15723 (comment), please go through breaking change review process

@zhenglaizhang There is no breaking change from 2021-06-01-preview which was the previous preview version that was introduced. There has been breaking changes from the previous stable version of course. Does this still need the breaking change review process? The reason I ask this is because my team is expecting to release a monthly -preview version and if we are needed to get the breaking change review done for each of these versions, it might be too time consuming both for the reviewers and us.

@sanjaiganesh - FYI.

[zhenglaizhang]

@laxmankumar12 the stable version is still live and takes the traffic, and also you are public the new API version since you are sending PR to the public spec repo, you need to do breaking change review.
If you are in private review, breaking change reviewed is then out of scope.

[openapi-workflow-bot]

Hi @laxmankumar12, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

[raych1]

@laxmankumar12 , can you attach the previous PR link so that we can approve this PR?

[hjhhh3000vitae]

@laxmankumar12 , can you attach the previous PR link so that we can approve this PR?

@raych1 @zhenglaizhang Please check this PR. It was to add 2021-06-01-preview and got approval for breaking change. #14650

[hjhhh3000vitae]

@laxmankumar12 , can you attach the previous PR link so that we can approve this PR?

@raych1 @zhenglaizhang Please check this PR. It was to add 2021-06-01-preview and got approval for breaking change. #14650

@raych1 @zhenglaizhang Could someone please check this PR?

[zhenglaizhang]

Hi @hjhhh3000vitae @laxmankumar12
In the previous PR #14650 you have got approval for RemovedProperty breaking change, and in this PR, you have adding a required property in input, so you need do breaking change review for this change.

[hjhhh3000vitae]

Hi @hjhhh3000vitae @laxmankumar12
In the previous PR #14650 you have got approval for RemovedProperty breaking change, and in this PR, you have adding a required property in input, so you need do breaking change review for this change.

Hello @zhenglaizhang Thank you for pointing out. This was due to a new change we did not pick up in this PR. I've updated this PR. Now there is only removeProperties breaking changes. Please take a look.

[hjhhh3000vitae]

Hi @hjhhh3000vitae @laxmankumar12
In the previous PR #14650 you have got approval for RemovedProperty breaking change, and in this PR, you have adding a required property in input, so you need do breaking change review for this change.

Hello @zhenglaizhang Thank you for pointing out. This was due to a new change we did not pick up in this PR. I've updated this PR. Now there is only removeProperties breaking changes. Please take a look.

Kindly ping. @zhenglaizhang @raych1

[hjhhh3000vitae]

Hi @hjhhh3000vitae @laxmankumar12
In the previous PR #14650 you have got approval for RemovedProperty breaking change, and in this PR, you have adding a required property in input, so you need do breaking change review for this change.

Hello @zhenglaizhang Thank you for pointing out. This was due to a new change we did not pick up in this PR. I've updated this PR. Now there is only removeProperties breaking changes. Please take a look.

Kindly ping. @zhenglaizhang @raych1

Kingly ping. @zhenglaizhang @raych1

[openapi-workflow-bot]

Hi, @laxmankumar12 your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com).

[mentat9]

Signing off from ARM side.