Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reactor, Reactor Netty, and Spring Framework Version Upgrades #19563

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Mar 8, 2021

Conversation

alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member

This PR upgrades reactor-core from 3.3.x to 3.4.x, reactor-netty from 0.9.x to 1.0.x, and Spring Framework from 2.3 to 2.4.

@check-enforcer
Copy link

check-enforcer bot commented Mar 3, 2021

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run java - [service] - ci

@backwind1233
Copy link
Contributor

backwind1233 commented Mar 3, 2021

@kushagraThapar @chenrujun
we are doing spring oob release now,
please do not merge the PR before the completing release,
I will inform you when the release is done.

@alzimmermsft alzimmermsft requested review from a team as code owners March 5, 2021 20:39
@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run java - search - tests

@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run java - cosmos - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run java - storage - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Member

@srnagar srnagar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please get this reviewed by the Spring and Management teams too.

eng/versioning/version_client.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/appconfiguration/tests.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/core/azure-core-amqp/pom.xml Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/storage/azure-storage-file-share/pom.xml Show resolved Hide resolved
@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

@amishra-dev, @kushagraThapar, @chenrujun, can I get a review on this PR, unit tests and integration tests are passing consistently with same run times as before the update.

@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run java - search - tests

@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run java - cosmos - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run java - storage - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Member

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for mgmt.

Copy link
Contributor

@backwind1233 backwind1233 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@mssfang mssfang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

appconfig LGTM!

@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

alzimmermsft commented Mar 8, 2021

Performance validation for this upgrade:

Cosmos

Rate: calls/second

Read Latency

Throughput:

Branch Mean Rate 1 Minute Rate 5 Minute Rate 15 Minute Rate
Current 7327.20 7239.88 6621.34 6369.42
Upgrade 7414.60 7275.57 6500.45 6190.30

Latency:

Latency: ms

Branch Mean Rate 1 Minute Rate 5 Minute Rate 15 Minute Rate Min Max Mean StdDev Median 75th Percentile 95th Percentile 98th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile
Current 7327.70 7241.74 6631.46 6382.93 0.90 145.75 1.34 1.50 1.25 1.34 1.59 2.13 3.64 9.83
Upgrade 7415.04 7277.46 6509.82 6202.66 0.88 87.56 1.32 0.90 1.23 1.32 1.58 2.36 4.03 10.42

Read Throughput

Branch Mean Rate 1 Minute Rate 5 Minute Rate 15 Minute Rate
Current 7337.04 7243.23 6594.44 6330.77
Upgrade 7372.59 7268.86 6536.13 6238.55

Write Throughput

Branch Mean Rate 1 Minute Rate 5 Minute Rate 15 Minute Rate
Current 1807.79 1684.08 1533.40 1497.23
Upgrade 1803.42 1709.50 1591.86 1563.92

Storage

Download

Branch 10KB Blob 1MB Blob 10MB Blob
Current 1296.96 95.94 12.32
Upgrade 1321.14 100.86 12.14

Upload

Branch 10KB Blob 1MB Blob 10MB Blob
Current 740.47 136.05 12.04
Upgrade 719.48 145 12.51

@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

/check-enforcer override

@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member Author

One live test is seeing failures consistent with other runs, not related to changes made in this PR

@alzimmermsft alzimmermsft merged commit 94285f5 into Azure:master Mar 8, 2021
@alzimmermsft alzimmermsft deleted the AzVersion_MergeReactorUpgrade branch March 8, 2021 19:33
azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2022
Web ant97 2022 03 01 (Azure#19430)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.Web from version stable/2021-03-01 to version 2022-03-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Carry fwd Microsoft.CertificateRegistration and Microsoft.DomainRegis… (Azure#18460)

* Carry fwd Microsoft.CertificateRegistration and Microsoft.DomainRegistration RPs to Api-version 2022-03-01

* Add x-ms-enum for array of inline enums. Fix reference to older api version for common defs

* Add examples for App Service Certificate orders

* Add suppressions back

* Add examples for Microsoft.DomainRegistration RP

* Fixes from prettier

* Remove unused example

* Add Unhealthy CustomDomainStatus for StaticSites (Azure#18557)

* Adding VnetRouteAllEnabled, VnetImagePullEnabled, VnetContentShareEnabled site properties to CommonDefinitions (Azure#18627)

* Added vnet realted site properties to common definitions

* removed tab

Co-authored-by: Tanay Bhartia <tanaybhartia@microsoft.com>

* Add Ftp/Remote debug properties to Ase network config (Azure#18549)

* Add Ftp/Remote debug properties to Ase network config

* Switched changes to the right file

* Add Networking config to hosting environment creates

* Added some of the missing examples

* Remove disallowed properties from example Ase GET response

* Adjusted responses from other gets

* Added a bunch more examples

* Added other missing examples for Ase.

* Added more missing examples for Ase.

* fixed formatting

* Edit some examples, add back privatelink apis and try to supress the errors for missing examples.

* Fix suppress spelling and fix prettier

* Added missing privatelink examples since suppressing did not work

* Add Bring your own Backend operations (Azure#18517)

* add bring your own backend operations

* add missing files

* fix json formattin

* validation fixes

* fix

* fix more validation

* fix ids

* fix model validation

* fix descriptions

* fix environmentName description

* change to 202

* revert change to 202

* customhostnamesites optional param for 2022 API version (Azure#18670)

* fix DUPLICATE_PARAMETER

* prettier

* fix  OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES

* fix random sub in examples

* add optional hostname param to customHostnameSites RT and add examples

* move changes from 2021 api version to 2022

* move examples to 2022

* Revert "add optional hostname param to customHostnameSites RT and add examples"

This reverts commit 7fc318e190de2108222dbb869d9a6219a02cae2f.

* remove examples from 2021

* fix lintDiff

* prettier fix

* model validation fix

* suppress model validation in readme

Co-authored-by: Elle Tojaroon <patojaro@microsoft.com>

* [Microsoft.Web] Add CustomDnsSuffixConfiguration to ASE (Azure#18553)

* [Microsoft.Web] Add CustomDnsSuffixConfiguration to AppServiceEnvironments

* Add examples

* Fix style issues

* Add customdnssuffix to custom-words

* Add CustomDnsSuffixConfiguration to AppServiceEnvironment definition

* Address remaining model validation errors

* Adjusted networking configuration definitions

* Addressed Arm review feedback

Co-authored-by: Jarod Aerts <jarodaerts@microsoft.com>

* Fork/web ant97 2022 03 01 (Azure#19259)

* Added DeploymentStatus API specs and examples

* change status to enum, rm extra dot

* suppress missing examples for now

* rm id from List Deployment Slot examples

* rm location, and rename deploymentId in GetSiteDeploymentStatus examples

* change model as string to true, add 202 operations for DeploymentStatus ops to spec

* rename operationId to deploymentStatusId, undo deploymentId rename

* add long running op, as per linter

Co-authored-by: Shubham Dhond <shdhond@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Weidong Xu <weidxu@microsoft.com>

* PublicNetworkAccess Swagger Change (Azure#19352)

* add publicNetworkAccess property in site for swagger

* add suppression to fix Model Validation CI

* Add allowed values in the description

* Add specs for Hosting Environment Maintenance Control (Azure#18691)

* Add documentation for Hosting Environment Maintenance Control

* Update example file name

* Make UpgradePreference non-nullable

* Correct indentation to 2 spaces

* Fix upgradePreference indentation

* Address swagger feedback. Add enums with descriptions.

* Move testNotification to request body. Update description text

* Fix testNotification

* Fix example

* Replace TestNotification parameter with TestUpgradeNotification API

* Rename to TestUpgradeAvailableNotification

* Added logic apps operations (Azure#18604)

* Added Initial Operations and some definitions

* Adding additional objects to support Logic Apps operations

* Updated path and parameters to match testing

* Prettier Fixes

* oav validat-example fixes

* Github validation fixes

* Prettier

* Updated examples and paths

* Prettier

* Revert "Prettier"

This reverts commit da090adf8005e0bd6fdc2ddebbd4390e5c4b6b20.

* Prettier

* Fixed model validation errors

* Filled in nextLinkName values

* Fixing swagger lintdiff errors

* added x-ms-long-running to async calls

* Adds numberOfWorkers to app service plan (Azure#19475)

* Adds numberOfWorkers to app service plan

* Add suppression for missing ASP examples

* Updating to fix workflow errors (Azure#19490)

* Removed conflicting resource definition and added reference to CommonDefinitions.json (Azure#19507)

* Removed conflicting resource definition and added reference to CommonDefinitions.json

* Updated resource to have workflow version

* Updated nextLink object to be correctly tagged (Azure#19560)

* Updated nextLink object to be correctly tagged

* Adding value placeholder

* Updated SKU to remove conflict

* Updated x-ms-enum

* Added missing model

* Adding more missing models

* Add suppressions for missing examples (Azure#19563)

Co-authored-by: Joseph Lin <54335291+joslinmicrosoft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanay Bhartia <tanaybhartia@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanay Bhartia <tanaybhartia@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: JarodAertsMs <90280240+JarodAertsMs@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: annikel <92825476+annikel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paviya (Elle) Tojaroon <pt335@cornell.edu>
Co-authored-by: Elle Tojaroon <patojaro@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Chen <chrc@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Jarod Aerts <jarodaerts@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: edwin-msft <71858592+edwin-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shubham Dhond <shdhond@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Weidong Xu <weidxu@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: jiansong-msft <77516279+jiansong-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Derek Johnson <47129225+dejo-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Karcher <alkarche@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants