Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate Storage to new linting pattern #39298

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member

Description

Migrates the Storage libraries to the new Checkstyle and Spotbugs linting patterns where the exclusion files are specific to the SDK, and not the global exclusion file.

All SDK Contribution checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce [breaking changes]
  • CHANGELOG is updated for new features, bug fixes or other significant changes.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

@alzimmermsft alzimmermsft self-assigned this Mar 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files) label Mar 19, 2024
@alzimmermsft alzimmermsft marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2024 12:29
@alzimmermsft alzimmermsft merged commit 276c88b into Azure:main Mar 20, 2024
29 checks passed
@alzimmermsft alzimmermsft deleted the AzStorage_UseNewLintingPattern branch March 20, 2024 19:49
drielenr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2024
Migrate Storage to new linting pattern
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants