-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Event Hubs] Introduce timeoutInMs #4239
Merged
Merged
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1d1975e
Exclude receiver related changes
ramya0820 badb691
Address comments
ramya0820 77b2968
Update sdk/eventhub/event-hubs/src/eventHubClient.ts
ramya0820 2736e34
Merge branch 'master' into issue-4171-eh-only
ramya0820 2884ff4
Address comments
ramya0820 6ad3edb
Merge branch 'issue-4171-eh-only' of https://github.com/ramya0820/azu…
ramya0820 ad2cd9b
Rename to timeoutInMs
ramya0820 5fac7c6
Update docs per newer requirements
ramya0820 f7ffdea
Fix options type
ramya0820 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just curious, was the TypeScript compiler unable to tell that options is always defined?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, in the IDE I was seeing a squiggly prompt that it may be undefined..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chradek Would you prefer
options && options.retryOptions
overoptions!.retryOptions
.I am aware of the knee jerk reaction we get when we see the
!
:)Was just curious about what you felt about the above alternative
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually wonder if changing
to
would solve the squiggles instead since then the compiler should see
options
always exists.Edit: Though if that doesn't work, I'd choose the
options && options.retryOptions
route instead.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updating the type had worked