order HTTP routes in a logical way

[briandunnington]

Consider two routes:

/api/recent
/api/{id}

Currently, Azure Functions orders routes by the alphabetical order of the function name, so it is non-deterministic as to which route will be choosen if a request for '/api/recent' comes in depending on the names of the functions.

This PR makes the order deterministic and sensible. It prefers static segments over parameterized segments (will always pick '/api/recent' for a request of '/api/recent' even though '/api/{id}' is also a match) and prefers more-specific (longer) routes over less-specific (shorter) routes if everything else is the same.

Addresses:
Azure/azure-functions-host#3153
Azure/azure-functions-core-tools#2442
Azure/azure-functions-host#3152
MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs#11755

cc @fabiocav

[karstenjMSFT]

Please consider this PR. It dramatically improves the logic of how functions handles routes. The PR has been open since April!

[grantborthwick]

Any progress on this? Our team would use this - our use case is that we have multiple routes defined, but also need to add a route at the root of the cname and want the more specific routes to take precedence over a wildcard match at the root. Either this or supporting Order on the HttpTriggerAttribute would support this scenario. Otherwise, we're implementing our own custom logic to route to sub-paths in a single function at the root.

Just also found this note that states that routes are considered alphabetically by FunctionName - Azure/azure-functions-host#3153 (comment) - this should work for our scenario by prefixing the function with z_.

[pregress]

Could also use this in the workers SDK...