Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: remove unused SKU selection labels #204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2024
Merged

chore: remove unused SKU selection labels #204

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

tallaxes
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Remove SKU selection labels that are unused

How was this change tested?

  • make presubmit

Does this change impact docs?

  • Yes, PR includes docs updates
  • Yes, issue opened: #
  • No

Release Note

@tallaxes tallaxes self-assigned this Mar 15, 2024
@tallaxes tallaxes added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. area/api Issues or PRs related to the APIs labels Mar 15, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8291467164

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.716%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8273658788: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 35591
Relevant Lines: 36423
💛 - Coveralls

@tallaxes tallaxes merged commit 99d1bb0 into main Mar 15, 2024
10 checks passed
@tallaxes tallaxes deleted the tallaxes/remove-unused-labels branch March 15, 2024 05:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Bryce-Soghigian Bryce-Soghigian Bryce-Soghigian approved these changes

Assignees

@tallaxes tallaxes

Labels
area/api Issues or PRs related to the APIs kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@tallaxes @coveralls @Bryce-Soghigian