Edge align Function created

[MDecarabas]

• Created a function that allows for aligning beam with edge

• Close Can lineup2() identify a leading or following edge? #935

[prjemian]

Note that CI fails on the ruff check:

   ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8.6/8.6 MB 87.0 MB/s eta 0:00:00
Installing collected packages: ruff
Successfully installed ruff-0.3.3
Run ruff . 
warning: `ruff <path>` is deprecated. Use `ruff check <path>` instead.
apstools/plans/alignment.py:21:19: F401 [*] `scipy.stats` imported but unused
apstools/plans/alignment.py:33:8: F401 [*] `warnings` imported but unused
apstools/plans/alignment.py:462:9: F811 Redefinition of unused `stats` from line 21
apstools/plans/alignment.py:470:21: F811 Redefinition of unused `stats` from line 21
apstools/plans/alignment.py:482:18: F811 Redefinition of unused `stats` from line 21
Found 5 errors.
[*] 2 fixable with the `--fix` option.
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.```

[prjemian]

Will we able to get this resolved and merged in the next week? I'd like to publish the 1.6.19 release next Friday (April 12). Or, could move it to next milestone.

[MDecarabas]

Will we able to get this resolved and merged in the next week? I'd like to publish the 1.6.19 release next Friday (April 12). Or, could move it to next milestone.

We can definitely make that happen.

[prjemian]

@MDecarabas I'm looking for changes that consider the covariance matrix from the fit as a means to validate if the desired feature has been found.

[prjemian]

Still some merge conflicts to resolve.

[prjemian]

Drop in code coverage is understandable. Unit testing would improve that score. (Good for the future.)

[prjemian]

LGTM

[prjemian]

Thought I saw merge conflicts, now there are none, waiting on the tests to run...

[MDecarabas]

Thought I saw merge conflicts, now there are none, waiting on the tests to run...

Yep, there were. But I fixed them right when I saw them