chore: Update dependencies and README

[CelticMajora]

📰 Summary of changes

• Add pub badge to README
• Update all dependencies to their most recent versions

Reviewers

/domain @Betterment/better_test_reporter-maintainers
/no-platform

[nanda-prbot]

Needs somebody from @Betterment/better_test_reporter-maintainers to claim domain review

Use the shovel operator to claim, e.g.:

@myname << domain && platform

_{HOW TO: Claim a Review}

[nanda-prbot]

Needs somebody from @Betterment/better_test_reporter-maintainers to claim domain review

Use the shovel operator to claim, e.g.:

@myname << domain && platform

_{HOW TO: Claim a Review}

[nanda-prbot]

Needs somebody from @Betterment/better_test_reporter-maintainers to claim domain review

Use the shovel operator to claim, e.g.:

@myname << domain && platform

_{HOW TO: Claim a Review}

[github-actions]

LCOV of commit 1248e57 during CI #46

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 86.9% (172 of 198 lines)
  functions..: no data found
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

⛔ The code coverage is too low. Expected at least 90.

[nanda-prbot]

Needs somebody from @Betterment/better_test_reporter-maintainers to claim domain review

Use the shovel operator to claim, e.g.:

@myname << domain && platform

_{HOW TO: Claim a Review}

[nanda-prbot]

Needs somebody from @Betterment/better_test_reporter-maintainers to claim domain review

Use the shovel operator to claim, e.g.:

@myname << domain && platform

_{HOW TO: Claim a Review}

[samandmoore]

<<domainlgtm

Just gotta figure out why the coverage went down??

[CelticMajora]

Think some generated freezed magic under the hood made it so factory constructors that were called in the pass are no longer registering as covered 🤔

[github-actions]

LCOV of commit 2767dff during CI #47

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 23.9% (331 of 1385 lines)
  functions..: no data found
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

⛔ The code coverage is too low. Expected at least 90.

[github-actions]

LCOV of commit b91a50f during CI #48

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 86.9% (172 of 198 lines)
  functions..: no data found
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

⛔ The code coverage is too low. Expected at least 90.

[github-actions]

LCOV of commit a5d955a during CI #49

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 95.0% (170 of 179 lines)
  functions..: no data found
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

[github-actions]

LCOV of commit ffdb512 during CI #50

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 95.0% (170 of 179 lines)
  functions..: no data found
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

[github-actions]

LCOV of commit d670c57 during CI #51

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 94.5% (172 of 182 lines)
  functions..: no data found
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

[CelticMajora]

bump nanda

Still not entirely sure why it started reporting factory constructors in freezed files as valid lines for coverage, but added in ignores to cover them. Only wrapped the factory constructors so that it should be clear to add anything else to these files outside of the ignore block. Will keep digging into the why 🤔

[samandmoore]

Weird!

[samandmoore]

<<domainlgtm