Fix required rule validation for missing fields #14
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The required rule validation now correctly handles cases where the field is missing from the input data. Previously, it would treat missing fields as valid, but now it correctly marks them as invalid. This change ensures that fields explicitly marked as required will cause validation to fail if they are not present in the input data, resulting in more accurate and reliable validation results. Resolves: #123
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The required rule validation now correctly handles cases where the field is missing from the input data. Previously, it would treat missing fields as valid, but now it correctly marks them as invalid.
This change ensures that fields explicitly marked as required will cause validation to fail if they are not present in the input data, resulting in more accurate and reliable validation results.
Resolves: #123