Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add description of MuSig signing to musig-spec.md #157
Add description of MuSig signing to musig-spec.md #157
Changes from all commits
b8f4e75
e0bb2d7
3c122d0
4824220
69b392f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's not equivalent if
pk1 = pk2
. We really want the "second pubkey" in the sense that it's unequal from the first.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be used with taproot, signing also needs a tweak parameter. I don't know if this needs to be passed into the nonce stuff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, see the PR description:
The implementation already has x-only tweaking and #151 adds "ordinary" tweaking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm tending towards changing the serialization of the nonce pair from
compressed(R1) || compressed(R2)
(66 bytes) toparity(R1) | parity(R2) << 1 || xonly(R1) || xonly(R2)
(65 bytes).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
parity(R1) | parity(R2) << 1
? (|
instead of&
)Although I'm having a hard time thinking of a case where this 1 byte matters, given that the partial nonces never appear in the blockchain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Eh sure, edited. OTOH there's no reason to add a useless byte.