-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clone the playlist type when creating a new playlist #229
Conversation
I not happy with this one, I am going to split the M3U and M3U8 playlist provider in Lizzy: Borewit/lizzy#88 |
b3bfc7a
to
e9cc77b
Compare
e9cc77b
to
17d8f67
Compare
Can you review this one @touwys? |
ListFix() 3.0.1-4_8932b93
|
Very true, but let's first get a common understanding what the issue is about: #193 (comment) |
@Borewit |
Changed the following:
|
18eafe8
to
6b57540
Compare
Is this build ready for review yet? |
It is. |
Review: listFix() 3.0.1-5 fb88fd9The "Save as" dialogue with which to save the newly created playlist now displays when the diskette on the toolbar is activated, and it presents the needed options. Issues:
Additional Comments:
|
Did I perhaps miss a build update? |
Not at all, I am just busy with work. |
a4af937
to
cfb0370
Compare
You may review this one @touwys |
listFix()-3.0.1-7-8948a2bAlthough I can recognise some of them, please advise me what specifically it is you want me to review? In the meantime, could you please have a look at the issue below before I proceed to review the rest? It hampers the review work flow to an extent.
[Reviewing the cloned playlist |
listFix()-3.0.1-7-8948a2bIssues:
• If still applicable, the following actions appear to have been fixed — save for the issues given above:
— |
I do not understand what this means, other then that you cannot play the tracks. |
The fix save-as dialog, I had, to kind of hack, the original behavior of this component. I may break under different look & feel (if the look and feel implementation of the JFileChooser does not implements BasicFileChooserUI). |
I cannot reproduce that, work just fine for me. I made very small change which prints the path of the generated playlist at "INFO" level, meaning it now appear by default in you log file. Can you provide an example, of the playlist (copy the content of the playlist) to an issue, plus the generated playlist which is generated when you hit the play button. You can find the path of the generated playlist in the log file, if you use the build following after this comment.
After you replaced the suggested filename with name without an extension? That is the only way I found to reproduce that. |
Maybe that is indeed interesting audience to include. But I want to keep things very simple. I want to avoid we move configuration files to a different location in favor of the portable deployment, and then run into trouble with the installer. The ideal deployment in my onion is via an app store, in which users can pull and remove the software with one click.
You will see such a warning when you use a recent out-of-the-box version of Windows: The only way to proceed, is clicking on "more info" and then you are able to override.
The Build message is being generated by a bot, for your convenience to easier link to the corresponding build. I will ask your review in separate message. The process, including what to review is, consistent: If will write a message, like I always do, when the PR is worth testing. But I am not going to repeat all obvious information.
If problems introduced by the PR, should be reported and address in the PR. Problems found which already exist before the PR should be reported in an new issue. If unsure, you can compare behavior with latest main branch build. This is how we should work: #237 . It is that simple. |
9f7b7d1
to
f89efd2
Compare
…ylist. Update lizzy to 4.0.0
- Prevent unsaved files from trying to be opened after restart - Show full path in tab tooltip - Change the default save folder, on Windows, from the users home directory to the "My Documents" folder. - Remove capitals on each word
Preserve the filename the user typed in, when he changes the playlist type (extension).
151a0cc
to
cc0e518
Compare
b23518b
to
2ea6d69
Compare
Draft #229 Clone the playlist type when creating a new playlist by Borewit
What a very pleasant surprise you pulled with this move, thank you! Has it been a difficult exercise so far? I am certainly looking forward to the very first portable release. |
Yes, and nothing else please! You generate so much distraction that you have no idea any more what the PR is about. Please read the following very careful, this is the very minimum you have to understand, otherwise I only spent my time de-tangle the chaos you create. A PR (Pull Request) is proposed change of the software, typically addressing an issue. So if you test a PR, you test that change. Do not direct the conversation on other subjects, neither on issues already found. At most you mention you came a cross it, and refer to issue you discuss the problem in full detail.
The last one I published on the PR. In principal I keep working on the PR until all problems are resolved, and the issue is resolved. When new build is there you can try again and see if previous errors are gone. Problems which are not introduced by the PR should be reported in a new issue, and addressed in a different PR. For new issues, it best to take a build from the main branch (and not rely on PR build, which is still subject to change). |
Please view the screenshot. The zip-file and executable it contains, are named after different version numbers. |
I installed "listFix-windows-binaries-v2.9.0-22-g83fd38c" in the root directory of the system drive, assuming it is a fully self-contained, portable installation. If it is, it started straight off with the correct app configuration, which it harvested from, and shares with, the current, non-binary, installation. It is therefore not a fully self-contained installation, or is that still in the pipeline? |
Oh this is very confusing. The short answer is, either build reflect the last change. The versions are a mess. And the build is actually not one the last commit, but potential merge with the main branch. v2.9.0-22-g83fd38c is the correct one, as the commit distance is 22, 15 is bogus. I will spawn it to a different issue. I will also put a versioned sub-folder inside the versioned "portable build". |
Resolves #193