-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 990
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move blocking_session_id in BlitzWho output beside session_id for easier block identification #3159
Comments
This is a neat idea! Just make sure to CTRL+F for |
I can do the change. My only concern is if it will cause issues with the storage table? May have to keep the existing order for table inserts supporting older versions of the table? Or do we just change the table column order as well causing issues with the older version of the schema?
From: Erik Darling ***@***.***>
Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 1:50 PM
To: BrentOzarULTD/SQL-Server-First-Responder-Kit ***@***.***>
Cc: davidhooey ***@***.***>, Assign ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [BrentOzarULTD/SQL-Server-First-Responder-Kit] Move blocking_session_id in BlitzWho output beside session_id for easier block identification (Issue #3159)
This is a neat idea! Just make sure to CTRL+F for blocking_session_id to catch all the place where column order would need to be changed.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#3159 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAVWXU7TAVF7K2PGE3AB4DWHPW6FANCNFSM6AAAAAARMMAE6Q>.
You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Yeah, I wouldn't mess with the table column order, if the goal is purely cosmetic. |
Great! I will start working on a pull request.
…________________________________
From: Erik Darling ***@***.***>
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 1:55:42 PM
To: BrentOzarULTD/SQL-Server-First-Responder-Kit ***@***.***>
Cc: davidhooey ***@***.***>; Assign ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [BrentOzarULTD/SQL-Server-First-Responder-Kit] Move blocking_session_id in BlitzWho output beside session_id for easier block identification (Issue #3159)
Yeah, I wouldn't mess with the table column order, if the goal is purely cosmetic.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#3159 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAVWXSPMV4ZFW52M2XEGRDWHPXS5ANCNFSM6AAAAAARMMAE6Q>.
You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
…t beside session_id for easier block identification
Issue #3159 - Move blocking_session_id in BlitzWho output beside session_id for easier block identification
Thanks for the pull request! Looks good. Merging into the dev branch, will be in the December release with credit to you in the release notes. |
@BrentOzar this change did not make it into the 2022-12-13 release for some reason. The However, the change is shown in the https://github.com/BrentOzarULTD/SQL-Server-First-Responder-Kit/blob/dev/sp_BlitzWho.sql#L690 Thanks! |
Sorry about that! Check now. |
Thanks! I see I see the change now on the 20221213main tag. |
It would be much easier to identify blocking chains when the
session_id
andblocking_session_id
columns are beside each other.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: