-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hashcleanup #278
Hashcleanup #278
Conversation
@commy2, what about changing the underlying structure to use |
hashes can use key different from strings, which is a benefit. |
oh, that's true. although using
Yes, that's a much safer alternative, although it's obviously much more work. |
Another possible alternative would be to add a second set of functions for "FastHashes", that only support string keys. |
Besides, for the first time in CBA those would be REAL hashed dicts |
|
location hashes are local only (I don't think you can publicVariable a location) |
ed was trying to convert objects to strings. |
Yeah, you are right. Porting current CBA Hashes to |
Real hashes as in using LOCATIONS with string keys? Converting objects to strings? Two LOCATIONS can do the trick by making the object key the value of a string key LOCATION. |
yes
I don't think that'd work reliably |
PR still has the same problems as the other one, tag WIP |
replaces #238
everyone should be able to edit this now