Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

shortwave redistribution #485

Closed
dabail10 opened this issue Jul 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

shortwave redistribution #485

dabail10 opened this issue Jul 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
@dabail10
Labels
Icepack Type: Feature

Comments

@dabail10
Copy link
Contributor

dabail10 commented Jul 9, 2020

The changes are in a pull request here, but this adds a namelist option and parameters for shortwave redistribution from the internal layers to the surface. This was in icepack_therm_bl99.F90, but not in icepack_therm_mushy.F90.
@eclare108213
Copy link
Contributor

See #479

@apcraig apcraig closed this as completed Jul 22, 2020
@apcraig
Copy link
Contributor

apcraig commented Jul 29, 2020

I think this is not #479, I think it's CICE-Consortium/Icepack#326. We need to create a CICE PR that updates Icepack, adds namelist to CICE, and adds calls to Icepack parameters to set the new Icepack variables.

@apcraig apcraig reopened this Jul 29, 2020
@dabail10 dabail10 mentioned this issue Jul 31, 2020
Merged
16 tasks
apcraig pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2020
@dabail10
Add sw_redist option to CICE (#497)
003aae0 
This integrates the sw_redist changes from Icepack into CICE.

Add three new namelist, sw_redist, sw_frac, and sw_dtemp.

The alt03 and alt04 test cases have been updated so that ktherm=1 is bfb. The default settings are such that ktherm=2 is bfb. This is the other piece to addressing issue #485 and CICE-Consortium/Icepack#280.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dabail10 dabail10

Labels
Icepack Type: Feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@eclare108213 @apcraig @dabail10