Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update icepack and version number #511

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2020
Merged

Conversation

apcraig
Copy link
Contributor

@apcraig apcraig commented Aug 26, 2020

PR checklist

  • Short (1 sentence) summary of your PR:
    Update Icepack code to latest and update CICE version number
  • Developer(s):
    apcraig
  • Suggest PR reviewers from list in the column to the right.
  • Please copy the PR test results link or provide a summary of testing completed below.
    Full test suite on conrad with 4 compilers is bit-for-bit,
    https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/Test-Results/wiki/cice_by_hash_forks#ef75d8cdb5b5c41939fdae0efdfa6f4053128354
  • How much do the PR code changes differ from the unmodified code?
    • bit for bit
    • different at roundoff level
    • more substantial
  • Does this PR create or have dependencies on Icepack or any other models?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Does this PR add any new test cases?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Is the documentation being updated? ("Documentation" includes information on the wiki or in the .rst files from doc/source/, which are used to create the online technical docs at https://readthedocs.org/projects/cice-consortium-cice/. A test build of the technical docs will be performed as part of the PR testing.)
    • Yes
    • No, does the documentation need to be updated at a later time?
      • Yes
      • No
  • Please provide any additional information or relevant details below:

@apcraig apcraig merged commit 7888bc8 into CICE-Consortium:master Aug 26, 2020
@apcraig apcraig deleted the ipup07 branch August 17, 2022 21:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants