Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

209 new build #250

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

209 new build #250

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor

Draft of new versions for #209

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chrisb13 - we can add the MOM version to this branch too. It doesn't build yet. There is some more to chase down in CESM_share still

(It gives this mysterious error:

 >> 547    /g/data/tm70/as2285/spack0.22/environments/x/access-om3-nuopc/share/CESM_share/src/shr_reprosum_mod.F90:453: undefined reference to `t_barrierf_'
     548    share/libOM3_share.a(shr_reprosum_mod.F90.o): In function `shr_reprosum_mod_mp_shr_reprosum_calc_':
  >> 549    /g/data/tm70/as2285/spack0.22/environments/x/access-om3-nuopc/share/CESM_share/src/shr_reprosum_mod.F90:453: undefined reference to `t_barrierf_'
     550    share/libOM3_share.a(shr_reprosum_mod.F90.o): In function `shr_reprosum_mod_mp_shr_reprosum_calc_':
  >> 551    /g/data/tm70/as2285/spack0.22/environments/x/access-om3-nuopc/share/CESM_share/src/shr_reprosum_mod.F90:453: undefined reference to `t_barrierf_'

)

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor Author

If ESCOMP/CESM_share#58 gets merged we can remove the #ifdef TIMING patch again.

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor Author

If ESCOMP/WW3#33 gets merged we can remove the ifdef W3_IC4 patch too

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor Author

I also asked about the wrong variable name in CDEPS here

I moved a newer CDEPS because it's sets a default value for a namelist parameter we don't set, (ESCOMP/CDEPS#315)

@anton-seaice anton-seaice force-pushed the 209-new-build branch 3 times, most recently from 660e4d6 to 038cc27 Compare December 13, 2024 02:59
Co-authored-by: Christopher Bull <5499680+chrisb13@users.noreply.github.com>
MOM6/src/core/MOM_dynamics_split_RK2b.F90
MOM6/src/equation_of_state/MOM_EOS_base_type.F90
MOM6/src/parameterizations/lateral/MOM_self_attr_load.F90

extra_sources/mom_cap_gtracer_flux.F90
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@chrisb13 - I think extra_sources should go in our mom6 branch also ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants