Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Explain why ConstF64 is not PartialEq #1829

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

Conversation

aborgna-q
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@aborgna-q aborgna-q requested a review from doug-q December 20, 2024 13:56
@aborgna-q aborgna-q requested a review from a team as a code owner December 20, 2024 13:56
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.66%. Comparing base (654cb7b) to head (088e94b).
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1829   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.66%   86.66%           
=======================================
  Files         192      192           
  Lines       34775    34775           
  Branches    31588    31588           
=======================================
  Hits        30137    30137           
  Misses       2936     2936           
  Partials     1702     1702           
Flag Coverage Δ
python 92.31% <ø> (ø)
rust 86.09% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aborgna-q aborgna-q enabled auto-merge December 20, 2024 16:06
@aborgna-q aborgna-q added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 20, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2d802e6 Jan 20, 2025
24 checks passed
@aborgna-q aborgna-q deleted the ab/doc-const-float-eq branch January 20, 2025 12:32
@hugrbot hugrbot mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants